Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Public Administration Studies
Triadi Eka Asi Jayadiputera
Brawijaya University
Arts Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Cash For Work Program At Nanga Pamolontian Village In Terms Of Good Enough Governance Perspective Triadi Eka Asi Jayadiputera; Sumartono; Muhammad Nuh; Sujarwoto
JPAS (Journal of Public Administration Studies) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Brawijaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jpas.2022.007.01.7

Abstract

Good governance, which was originally expected to be able to solve problems in developing countries, turned out to meet many obstacles, one of which was the application of the one size fit for all pattern, which was then criticized by Grindle through the concept of Good Enough Governance (GEG). Cash For Work (CFW) Program which is one of the reform programs as an embodiment of good governance that involves community participation as labor. During its journey, the CFW encountered various problems in the field, so it was interesting to see how the CFW program was viewed from the perspective of GEG. This study aims to describe and analyze the characteristics of the arena, institutions and interests as well as actions and choices in the perspective of GEG in the implementation of CFW program in Nanga Pamolontian Village, Bulik District, Lamandau Regency, Central Kalimantan Province. This research method uses a qualitative case study approach. The results of this study are that in the implementation of CFW program they have not paid attention to the elements of GEG, both in the arena, institutions and interests and actions, this is because the agenda setting has not utilized official and unofficial channels to the fullest, related stakeholders such as the mass media and Non-Governmental Organizations, regional apparatus, local village assistants are not fully involved in the implementation of CFW, there are no technical regulations in the implementation of CFW, the Team for Facilitating the Use of Village Funds for CFW is not utilized, evaluation, guidance and supervision have not been carried out, lack of socialization and training for the team implementing activities.
Good Enough Governance For Poverty Alleviation Program In Village (A Case Study of Nanga Pamolontian Village) Triadi Eka Asi Jayadiputera; Sumartono; Muhammad Nuh; Sujarwoto
JPAS (Journal of Public Administration Studies) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Brawijaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jpas.2023.008.01.1

Abstract

Scientists and public administration practitioners still find it hard to answer how to develop new institutions with limited resources. What principles must be prioritized by public managers when developing such institutions? This study aimed to answer such a question. Our case study involving new villages in remote areas of Kalimantan, Indonesia, confirmed four principles to be prioritized by public managers in implementing development programs in villages: (1) focusing on poverty alleviation, (2) being punctually oriented, (3) priority-oriented, and (4) paying attention to human resources. Focusing on poverty alleviation has the most significant proportion since it aims to achieve reformation agenda by choosing the most beneficial and relevant programs to eradicate poverty. Punctually oriented means that programs must be arranged historically based on the characteristics and conditions of the local people. Priority-oriented means sorting out programs and activities the local people truly need. Paying attention to available human resources means considering the skills and abilities of human resources to do the programs planned. Our findings confirmed that the village did not implement good enough governance (GEG) well because it did not involve the poor as workers, did not analyze the work, did not make a list of work as the priority, and did not involve the local people but people from other villages. Thus, we recommend the need for specific intervention related to policy and institutionalization so the village can run the poverty alleviation programs and community empowerment through Cash for Work Programs.
Co-Authors Muhammad Nuh Sujarwoto Sumartono