Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Media Hukum Jurnal Konstitusi
Meta Suriyani, Meta
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Pertentangan Asas Perundang-undangan dalam Pengaturan Larangan Mobilisasi Anak pada Kampanye Pemilu Suriyani, Meta
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 13, No 3 (2016)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (386.816 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1339

Abstract

Article 32 paragraph (1) letter k Election Commission Regulation No. 15 Year 2013 describes implementers, participants, and officials are prohibited from mobilizing campaigns Indonesian citizens who do not meet syarats as Voters. However, Law No. 8 of 2012 on General Election of DPR, DPD and DPRD itself, does not expressly prohibit the mobilization of Indonesian citizens who do not yet qualify as a selector or exploitation of children in political activities, including campaign. So that the Commission regulation violates the hierarchy of legislation that is in of commencement shall contrary to the Law on Election of Members of Legislative as higher regulations. Therefore, it is also not in line with Law No. 35 of 2014 on the Amendment of Act No. 23 of 2002 on Child Protection. Mobilization of children in the activities of the election campaign is the deprivation of the rights of the child. Intentionally or unintentionally, the actual implementers, participants, and campaign officers have done wrong treatment (exploitation) by mobilizing children who do not qualify as voters in political activities in the activities of the election campaign for the DPR, DPD and DPRD held at central and regional levels occur in almost all parts of Indonesia.
Law on Khamr Under Qanun Jinayat in Aceh and Brunei Darussalam: A Comparative Study Natsir, Muhammad; Arbas, Cakra; Suriyani, Meta
Media Hukum Vol 26, No 1 (2019): JUNE 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Drinking khamr (liquor) is an offence under the Criminal Act (Qanun Jinayat) in Aceh and Brunei Darussalam. This paper aims at comparing the law relating to khamr in both jurisdictions. The study was made through content analysis using comparative approach. It is found that both in Aceh and Brunei Darussalam, drinking khamr is subjected to penalty in the form of whipping not exceeding 40 times. The sentence that was adopted from Shariah to be imposed within a trial held by the Shariah Court. Beside similarity, there are some differences especially in relation to the applicability, enforcement and proceedings. The law on khamr in Aceh as stipulated in its Qanun Jinayat is enforced by the Shariah Judge, while the prosecution of drinking khamr in Brunei Darussalam requires the role of prosecutor. Keywords: Drinking Khamr, Criminal Act, Qanun Jinayat and Shariah Court.
Co-Authors Cakra Arbas Muhammad Natsir