Anwar Hidayat
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF DELAY REPORTING OF SHARE ACQUISITION BETWEEN PT. AGRO PRATAMA AND PT. DHARMA SATYA NUSANTARA BASED ON LAW NUMBER 5 OF 1999 CONCERNING PROHIBITION OF MONOPOLY PRACTICES AND UNFAIR BUSINESS COMPETITION (KPPU Case Study Number 29/KPPU-M Annisa Putri azra; Anwar Hidayat; Yuniar Rahmatiar
Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 8 No 2 (2023): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36805/jjih.v8i2.5776

Abstract

The acquisition of a company is a legal act carried out by a legal entity or an individual to take over the shares of a company by purchasing a portion or the entire wealth of the company. The problem identified in this research is why reporting of company share acquisitions to the Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition (KPPU) is only related to acquisitions that have material value and what are the legal consequences of the delay in acquiring company shares in Case Number 29/KPPU-M/2019. The purpose of this research is to understand the reasons why reporting of company share acquisitions to the KPPU is only related to acquisitions that have material value and to determine the legal consequences of the delay in acquiring company shares in Case Number 29/KPPU-M/2019. This research uses a normative juridical approach. The data collection technique used in this research is literature study using primary legal materials and secondary legal materials as data sources. In conclusion, the rules regarding non-material reporting are not explicitly stated in KPPU Regulation Number 1 of 2009 concerning Pre-Notification, Mergers, Consolidations, Acquisitions, and Takeovers. As for the alleged delay in reporting in the acquisition of the company, PT. Dharma Satya Nusantara is required to pay an administrative fine as a consequence of the delayed reporting, as stipulated in Article 29(1) of Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition.
EFEKTIVITAS PERAN LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN DALAM UPAYA PEMBINAAN NARAPIDANA DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 22 TAHUN 2022 TENTANG PEMASYARAKATAN Firman Aji Pamungkas; Muhamad Abas; Anwar Hidayat
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol 6 No 1 (2023): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v6i1.811

Abstract

Correctional Institution is a place to carry out coaching for prisoners and Correctional Students which is carried out using the correctional system. This study aims to (1) determine the effectiveness of the role of correctional institutions in the efforts to foster convicts in terms of law no. 22 of 2022 concerning correctional (2) determines the implementation of coaching in Class IIA Bekasi Penitentiary for convicts who are sentenced to light crimes. The type of research used in this research is empirical juridical with the nature of descriptive research. This research was conducted at the Bekasi Class IIA Penitentiary. The data collection technique was carried out by using interviews and literature study techniques. The data collection method was processed qualitatively. The results of the research (1) determine the effectiveness of the role of correctional institutions in the efforts to foster convicts in terms of law no. 22 of 2022 concerning correctional facilities is not yet fully effective because in reality there are still convicts who commit repeated crimes. (2) knowing that the implementation of coaching in Class IIA Bekasi Penitentiary for convicts sentenced to light crimes has not been fully implemented properly, as evidenced by the fact that the rights of prisoners have not been fully fulfilled and some activities are not running optimally due to overcapacity of correctional institutions, not in proportion to the number training officers and convicts, as well as the lack of supporting facilities and infrastructure for coaching.