Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal IJIES (International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System)
Kartika Salsabilla Wulandari
Telkom university
Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Implementing AHP Method for Determining Level Priority of Vendor Selection Kartika Salsabilla Wulandari; Sri Widaningrum; Sheila Amalia Salma
International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol 7 No 02 (2023): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System
Publisher : School of Industrial and System Engineering, Telkom University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25124/ijies.v7i02.240

Abstract

Vendors are suppliers of goods or services that help the production process of a company. One of the companies that carry out vendor selection is CV Milyarda Cipta Karya which is engaged in fashion. Vendor selection is an activity to determine vendors who will work with the company to help the production process. Based on an assessment of the 30 most popular CV Milyarda Cipta Karya's products on Shopee, there are consumer complaints about the inconsistent quality of materials. This problem is caused by the absence of standards governing the mechanism for selecting fabric vendors. Therefore, it is necessary to know the priority level of vendor selection criteria. Vendor selection criteria are Quality of goods, response time, location, flexibility, price, vendor inventory policy, and vendor service. The data needed in the design are vendor selection criteria according to William J Stevenson, namely hierarchical data and criteria weighting questionnaires. The method used to determine the priority level of vendor selection criteria is the Analytical Hierarchy Process method. Based on the calculation of the AHP method, the results obtained are the criteria for quality of goods 0.19, location 0.12, response time 0.12, vendor inventory policy 0.09, flexibility 0.09, price 0.11, and vendor service 0.28. The largest priority value is vendor service and the smallest is flexibility.
Co-Authors Sheila Amalia Salma Sri Widaningrum