Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Natasya Yunita Sugiastuti
Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
PERBANDINGAN HUKUM KETENTUAN PERKAWINAN POLIGAMI DI INDONESIA DAN MESIR Raka Haikal Anfasya; Natasya Yunita Sugiastuti
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v5i2.15839

Abstract

According to Indonesian law, monogamy is the foundation of marriage, although this principle is not unbreakable but rather flexible. Marriage law sets forth strong guidelines and requirements for polygamous marriages in order to prevent violations of and injury to wives' rights and to generally safeguard women. This study compares the polygamy provisions based on Egyptian and Indonesian law to examine the polygamy issue. The research is normative, using secondary data, qualitative analysis, and deductive conclusion. Research findings: Indonesian law regarding polygamous marriages is more comprehensive and complex than Egyptian law. Here some characteristics of polygamous marriages: the husband asks permission to engage in polygamy from the court; there is an obligation of notification and permission from the first wife; a reason to practice polygamy; sanctions for parties who violate the provisions on polygamy. In conclusion, Muh.Irham's decision was proven to have abandoned Nurdiana because she remarried secretly and according to Article 45 (1) PP No.9 1975 Muh.Irham was threatened with a fine of Rp.7500. Meanwhile, Big Ramy was proven to have committed polygamy secretly and according to Article 23 Bis Law 100 of 1985 was threatened with imprisonment for 6 months and a fine of 200 (Two Hundred) Pounds.
PERBANDINGAN HUKUM KETENTUAN PERKAWINAN POLIGAMI DI INDONESIA DAN MESIR Raka Haikal Anfasya; Natasya Yunita Sugiastuti
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 2 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v5i2.15839

Abstract

According to Indonesian law, monogamy is the foundation of marriage, although this principle is not unbreakable but rather flexible. Marriage law sets forth strong guidelines and requirements for polygamous marriages in order to prevent violations of and injury to wives' rights and to generally safeguard women. This study compares the polygamy provisions based on Egyptian and Indonesian law to examine the polygamy issue. The research is normative, using secondary data, qualitative analysis, and deductive conclusion. Research findings: Indonesian law regarding polygamous marriages is more comprehensive and complex than Egyptian law. Here some characteristics of polygamous marriages: the husband asks permission to engage in polygamy from the court; there is an obligation of notification and permission from the first wife; a reason to practice polygamy; sanctions for parties who violate the provisions on polygamy. In conclusion, Muh.Irham's decision was proven to have abandoned Nurdiana because she remarried secretly and according to Article 45 (1) PP No.9 1975 Muh.Irham was threatened with a fine of Rp.7500. Meanwhile, Big Ramy was proven to have committed polygamy secretly and according to Article 23 Bis Law 100 of 1985 was threatened with imprisonment for 6 months and a fine of 200 (Two Hundred) Pounds.
-: PERBANDINGAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN PERCERAIAN DAN AKIBATNYA TERHADAP HAK ASUH ANAK ANTARA INDONESIA DAN TURKI Andrian Triwahyudi; Natasya Yunita Sugiastuti
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 4 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v5i4.18350

Abstract

Bubarnya perkawinan akibat perceraian mempengaruhi status hukum dan menimbulkan akibat hukum. Salah satu akibat hukum yang timbul dari perceraian adalah hak asuh terhadap anak. (1) Bagaimana persamaan dan perbedaan pengaturan tentang alasan perceraian dan akibatnya terhadap hak asuh anak di Indonesia dengan Turki? (2) Bagaimana persamaan dan perbedaan ketentuan perceraian dan penyelesaian kasus tentang perceraian dengan alasan perzinahan dalam Putusan Nomor XXX/Pdt.G/2021/PN/Bjw berdasarkan Undang-Undang Perkawinan Indonesia dan putusan Hukuk Dairesi 2021/3939 E., 2021/5197 K.  berdasarkan Türk Medeni Kanunu Turkish Family Law of Cyprus tahun 1951? Penelitian hukum normatif ini sifatnya deskriptif, dilakukan melalui metode perbandingan hukum. Menggunakan data sekunder, dianalisis secara kualitatif, disimpulkan dengan metoda deduktif. Hasil penelitian: putusnya perkawinan karena perceraian menurut hukum Indonesia dan Turki sama-sama harus melalui pengadilan; ada kesamaan alasan perceraian, yaitu perzinahan, penganiayaan, kejahatan dan tidak adanya harapan rukun kembali. Ada perbedaan tenggang waktu untuk alasan perceraian karena meninggalkan pihak lain. Ke dua negara sama-sama menetapkan hak asuh anak setelah perceraian ke dua negara berada pada ayah dan ibu, dan ayah berkewajiban memberikan nafkah bagi isteri. Dengan perbedaan, di Turki kewajiban memberikan tunjangan kepada istri didasarkan pertimbangan setelah perceraian, maka istri akan menjadi lebih miskin
Pembagian Harta Bersama Pasca PerceraianPasangan Berbeda Kewarganegaraan: Perbandingan Hukum Indonesia dan Belanda Ditasya Aulia Putri; Natasya Yunita Sugiastuti
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 4 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v5i4.18640

Abstract

This study examines the separation of marital property after divorce between mixed married couples. It compares Indonesian and Dutch laws on the division of matrimonial property upon divorce, focusing the case of Henk Willem van Der Spil (a Dutch citizen) and Dyah Supriyantini (an Indonesian citizen). The study shows how the two legal systems are alike and different The research type is normative and descriptive, utilizing secondary data, qualitative analysis, and a comparative legal approach with deductive conclusions. The findings display similarities: 1) Research considers the division of shared belongings among couples in mixed marriages according to the HPI factors; 2) Both the Indonesian and Dutch HPI designate Indonesian law as applicable. The variations include: 1) Under Indonesian law, land and buildings are not counted as community property, whereas Dutch law regards them as such and divides them equally. 2) Indonesian law excludes the income of the Tulips Hotel and Resto from community property, while Dutch law includes it. 3) The Dutch law recognizes "divorce covenant," a concept that is not present in Indonesian law. Recommendations: to achieve fairness, judges should. consider international civil law and foreign law aspects when dividing property in joint ownership between mixed marriage couples.
Co-Authors Andrian Triwahyudi Ditasya Aulia Putri Raka Haikal Anfasya