Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
2.808
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik Buletin Al-Turas Dimas: Jurnal Pemikiran Agama untuk Pemberdayaan Jurnal Mahasiswa Ilmu Pemerintahan Cosmogov: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan JURNAL ILMU PEMERINTAHAN Journal of Governance JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik) Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review POLITICO Satwika : Kajian Ilmu Budaya dan Perubahan Sosial Al-Mada: Jurnal Agama, Sosial, dan Budaya Sospol : Jurnal Sosial Politik Journal of Local Government Issues JRP (Jurnal Review Politik)
George Towar Ikbal Tawakkal
Universitas Brawijaya
Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 19 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search
Journal : Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review

 1 
Gapit: Jaringan Mobilisasi Suara di Pilkades Tawakkal, George Towar Ikbal
Jurnal Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review Vol 2, No 1 (2017): UU Desa: Mewujudkan Kemandirian Aras Lokal atau Jebakan Ketergantungan Dana Pusa
Publisher : Political Science Program, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (905.853 KB) | DOI: 10.15294/jpi.v2i1.8485

Abstract

Villagers have practiced democracy since colonial era. They have lurah election. Government still keep it, although national politics got some regim change. Now, it is called as Village head election (Pilkades). Pilkades has a distinctive character than other election form in Indonesia. No political party in Pilkades. That asked candidates to build political machine for mobilizing voters. This article talk about how the political machine was built, what shape of the political machine is, and how it work. I conducted observation and some interviews to peoples who involved in 2016 Mranggen Village Head Election. The result, Mranggen villagers call the political machine as gapit. Gapit was constructed by prestige, social relationship, and material. Their consolidation can be distinguished in two process, transformating and creating. Gapit is a network, which has structure with three level; coordinator gapit, RW gapit, and RT gapit. They have tasks: mapping voter, developing issue, organizing meeting, distributing goods, and monitoring presence of voters in polling station. This article will contribute to discussing about extending meaning of vote broker, not only as intermediary between candidate and voters in distributing money.
Similarity Amidst Diversity: Lessons about Women Representation from Pati and Demak Tawakkal, George Towar Ikbal; Utaminingsih, Alifiulahtin; Garner, Andrew D.; Wike, Wike; Seitz, Thomas R.; Putra, Fadillah
Jurnal Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review Vol 6, No 1 (2021): In progress (April 2021)
Publisher : Political Science Program, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ipsr.v6i1.22745

Abstract

While the focus of most research in women's politics has been on the number of legislative seats and explaining the under-representation of women and other marginalized groups, we argue that there also needs to be a greater focus on voters themselves and their attitudes about gender representation in Indonesia. We focus on three broad series of questions. First, gender differences in attitudes about women candidates precisely. Second, gender differences in policy priorities. Third, gender differences in attitudes about one specific aspect of Indonesian elections – money politics or what is sometimes referred to as "vote-buying." The data are drawn from a stratified probability sample of citizens in the Demak and Pati regencies in Central Java, Indonesia. A total of 800 respondents were in the sample, including 55 percent of the sample consisted of women. The finding has some interesting implications in how to understand gender differences in Indonesian politics. Men and women both respond with the correct "rhetoric" view about the importance of women candidates and descriptive representation. Still, both genders shift from the "rhetoric" view to the "logic" view about policies that have a more direct impact on their own lives.
Similarity Amidst Diversity: Lessons about Women Representation from Pati and Demak Tawakkal, George Towar Ikbal; Utaminingsih, Alifiulahtin; Garner, Andrew D.; Wike, Wike; Seitz, Thomas R.; Putra, Fadillah
Jurnal Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review Vol 6, No 1 (2021): Local Politics
Publisher : Political Science Program, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ipsr.v6i1.22745

Abstract

While the focus of most research in women's politics has been on the number of legislative seats and explaining the under-representation of women and other marginalized groups, we argue that there also needs to be a greater focus on voters themselves and their attitudes about gender representation in Indonesia. We focus on three broad series of questions. First, gender differences in attitudes about women candidates precisely. Second, gender differences in policy priorities. Third, gender differences in attitudes about one specific aspect of Indonesian elections – money politics or what is sometimes referred to as "vote-buying." The data are drawn from a stratified probability sample of citizens in the Demak and Pati regencies in Central Java, Indonesia. A total of 800 respondents were in the sample, including 55 percent of the sample consisted of women. The finding has some interesting implications in how to understand gender differences in Indonesian politics. Men and women both respond with the correct "rhetoric" view about the importance of women candidates and descriptive representation. Still, both genders shift from the "rhetoric" view to the "logic" view about policies that have a more direct impact on their own lives.
Gapit: Jaringan Mobilisasi Suara di Pilkades Tawakkal, George Towar Ikbal
Jurnal Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review Vol 2, No 1 (2017): UU Desa: Mewujudkan Kemandirian Aras Lokal atau Jebakan Ketergantungan Dana Pusa
Publisher : Political Science Program, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jpi.v2i1.8485

Abstract

Villagers have practiced democracy since colonial era. They have lurah election. Government still keep it, although national politics got some regim change. Now, it is called as Village head election (Pilkades). Pilkades has a distinctive character than other election form in Indonesia. No political party in Pilkades. That asked candidates to build political machine for mobilizing voters. This article talk about how the political machine was built, what shape of the political machine is, and how it work. I conducted observation and some interviews to peoples who involved in 2016 Mranggen Village Head Election. The result, Mranggen villagers call the political machine as gapit. Gapit was constructed by prestige, social relationship, and material. Their consolidation can be distinguished in two process, transformating and creating. Gapit is a network, which has structure with three level; coordinator gapit, RW gapit, and RT gapit. They have tasks: mapping voter, developing issue, organizing meeting, distributing goods, and monitoring presence of voters in polling station. This article will contribute to discussing about extending meaning of vote broker, not only as intermediary between candidate and voters in distributing money.
Is It Still in the Works? Understanding e-Government as A Stage in the Democratic Process Tawakkal, George Towar Ikbal
Jurnal Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review Vol 7, No 2 (2022): Politics and Business
Publisher : Political Science Program, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ipsr.v7i2.37770

Abstract

Democracy operates through the mechanisms of society. Today, technology has become an integral part of societal development, has permeated many aspects of life, and is expected to play an important role in democracy. The government, activists, and academics have all advocated for the use of technology in government, known as e-government. While there is academic debate about its impact on democracy, this article believes it is critical to place impact after development. This viewpoint is useful for engaging in academic debate. Assuming that each stage has its own timetable, this article asks, "What stage is e-government at right now?" Looking at the indicators measured by various agencies and positioning them as shared awareness of e-government, it is possible to conclude that today is the stage of e-government development. The answer may serve as a reminder to academics researching the impact of e-government.
Co-Authors Abdullah Abdullah Ahmad Zaki Fadlur Rohman Alifiulahtin Utaminingsih Andik Setiawan Andrew D Garner Andrew Douglas Garner Asma Wati Asmawati Asmawati Asmawati Suwarno Clariesa Brillian Damayanti, Ratnaningsih Fadillah Putra Faradiba, Dalilah Naja Fatyah Qonita Umar Garner, Andrew D. La Ode Machdani Afala Masruri Masruri Muhammad Lukman Hakim Rayhan Aulia Prakoso Seitz, Thomas R. Sholih Muadi Thomas R Seitz Thomas R Seitz Tia Subekti Ulfah, Irma Fitriana Wawan Sobari Wike, Wike