Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
2.808
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik Buletin Al-Turas Dimas: Jurnal Pemikiran Agama untuk Pemberdayaan Jurnal Mahasiswa Ilmu Pemerintahan Cosmogov: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan JURNAL ILMU PEMERINTAHAN Journal of Governance JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik) Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review POLITICO Satwika : Kajian Ilmu Budaya dan Perubahan Sosial Al-Mada: Jurnal Agama, Sosial, dan Budaya Sospol : Jurnal Sosial Politik Journal of Local Government Issues JRP (Jurnal Review Politik)
George Towar Ikbal Tawakkal
Universitas Brawijaya
Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 19 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik

 1 
Integrating Social Values: Evidence from The Intermediary Institution in Indonesian Elections George Towar Ikbal Tawakkal
Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik Vol 13, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Politik, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/politika.13.2.2022.337-348

Abstract

Many scholars called the intermediary institutions in elections as vote brokers. As a consequence of that, then they built an argument based on a transactional framework, especially about the motivation of the institution. On the other side, they agreed that vote brokerage was built based on a social network, especially when they tried to define the vote brokerage. It means, the intermediary institution occurred in social interactions. That is weird for explaining social interactions without considering other social values. It looks like social interaction is only about material value. Other scholars tried to be fairness by calling the intermediary as middlemen, but still very few literature built the argument based on a non-transactional framework. This study will certainly provide new insights into the intermediary institution studies, particularly related to the understanding of non-transactional amid transactional arguments that have been shown in many kinds of literature, as well as expanding the study of intermediary institutions which likely to focused on providing voters, to be focused on the establishment of intermediary institutions. We conducted a series of in-depth interviews with 45 people consisting of persons in the intermediary institutions, political party leaders, leaders of campaign teams, election organizers, and more than a hundred voters during 2017 – 2019 in Indonesian elections, consists of four Villages head elections, 2018 Governor election, and 2019 legislative elections. We found the transactional logic or material value was not the only one, even mostly was not the dominant value that generated the intermediary institutions.
Co-Authors Abdullah Abdullah Ahmad Zaki Fadlur Rohman Alifiulahtin Utaminingsih Andik Setiawan Andrew D Garner Andrew Douglas Garner Asma Wati Asmawati Asmawati Asmawati Suwarno Clariesa Brillian Damayanti, Ratnaningsih Fadillah Putra Faradiba, Dalilah Naja Fatyah Qonita Umar Garner, Andrew D. La Ode Machdani Afala Masruri Masruri Muhammad Lukman Hakim Rayhan Aulia Prakoso Seitz, Thomas R. Sholih Muadi Thomas R Seitz Thomas R Seitz Tia Subekti Ulfah, Irma Fitriana Wawan Sobari Wike, Wike