Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Arus Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora
Muhammad Yusuf
Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara Kendari, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Penegakan Hukum Pidana terhadap Tindakan Gelandangan dan Pengemis di Tempat Umum St. Fatmawati.L; M. Yusuf; Muhammad Abdillah; Rifkah Anniza Rahman
Arus Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora Vol 1 No 3: Desember (2021)
Publisher : Arden Jaya Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57250/ajsh.v1i3.47

Abstract

Pesatnya pembangunan di kawasan kota menjadi daya pikat bagi kaum di pedesaan untuk mengadu nasib. Hal ini dikarenakan kawasan perkotaan sebagai pusat ekonomi yang besar. Akibatnya terjadi perurbanisasi secara masif dari area perdesaan ke area perkotaan tanpa didukung kapasitas yang memadai. Munculnya fenomena pengemis di perkotaan menjadi salah satu implikasi dari persoalan tersebut. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui faktor-faktor yang menjadikan kawasan perkotaan menjadi daya pikat akan gelandangan dan pengemis di Kota Kendari. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa berdasarkan studi di lapangan bahwa gelandangan pengemis yang ada di tempat umum telah meningkat lebih dari 50%. Hal ini diimplikasikan dengan meningkatnya Kemiskinan disebabkan oleh redupya sector perekonomian akibat COVID 19. Oleh karena itu, perlunya di adakan tindakan hukum terhadap gelandangan dan pengemis dan juga upaya penertibannya sesuai dengan peraturan yang berlaku.
Handling of medical malapractice criminal in criminal Law policies Muhammad Yusuf
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol 21, No 2 (2022): PENA JUSTISIA
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v21i2.4045

Abstract

The study aims to determine (1) the applicable current criminal law policy concerning the  medical malpractice. (2) the future criminal law concerning the medical malpractice,and (3) the mechanism for medical malpractice settlement. The study uses normative juridical approach that is bibliographical review to obtain the secondary data. The study reveals that: 1. The settlement of medical malpractice in the current positive law is in the articles : 267, 322, 344, 345, 349, 359, 360, 386, and 531 of the Criminal Code, and Articles : 190,192,193,194,195, and 196 of the Law No. 36 of 2009 of Health, articles 75,76,77,78,79, and 80; Law No. 29 of 2004;Indonesian positive law of either Penal Code, Law No. 36 of 2009 on Health, Law No. 29 of 2004 on Medical Practice Law,or the post-verdict of Constitutional Court has not specifically covered malpractice. 2. The future criminal law policy in the settlement of medical malpractice has to be driven from the positive law, particularly Articles 575,576,578,589,592, and 593 of Penal Code draft of 2008. 3. The mechanism of malpractice case settlement for both criminal and civil law suit between doctors and hospitals against the patients and the family or their representatives can be done either in litigation (in court) or in non-litigation (outside court)
Handling of medical malapractice criminal in criminal Law policies Muhammad Yusuf
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol 21, No 2 (2022): PENA JUSTISIA
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v21i2.4045

Abstract

The study aims to determine (1) the applicable current criminal law policy concerning the  medical malpractice. (2) the future criminal law concerning the medical malpractice,and (3) the mechanism for medical malpractice settlement. The study uses normative juridical approach that is bibliographical review to obtain the secondary data. The study reveals that: 1. The settlement of medical malpractice in the current positive law is in the articles : 267, 322, 344, 345, 349, 359, 360, 386, and 531 of the Criminal Code, and Articles : 190,192,193,194,195, and 196 of the Law No. 36 of 2009 of Health, articles 75,76,77,78,79, and 80; Law No. 29 of 2004;Indonesian positive law of either Penal Code, Law No. 36 of 2009 on Health, Law No. 29 of 2004 on Medical Practice Law,or the post-verdict of Constitutional Court has not specifically covered malpractice. 2. The future criminal law policy in the settlement of medical malpractice has to be driven from the positive law, particularly Articles 575,576,578,589,592, and 593 of Penal Code draft of 2008. 3. The mechanism of malpractice case settlement for both criminal and civil law suit between doctors and hospitals against the patients and the family or their representatives can be done either in litigation (in court) or in non-litigation (outside court)
Co-Authors Muhammad Abdillah Rifkah Anniza Rahman St. Fatmawati.L