Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam
Umi Rosyidah
Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Muhammadiyah Karangasem Paciran
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Muhammad Imarah's Thought on Fiqh Moderation Ahmad Hasan al-Banna; Umi Rosyidah; Hammis Syafaq
Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): Desember 2023
Publisher : Department of Comparative Mazhab Comparative, Fakulty of Shariah and Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/komparatif.v3i2.2037

Abstract

Abstract: Modern scholars know the clash of two conflicting currents of thought, between the extreme right (tafrith) and the extreme left (ifrath) currents. This is very dangerous for Islamic civilization. Therefore, wasathiy (moderate) Islamic scholars, such as Muhammad Imarah (1931-2020) seek to direct Muslims to understand and implement the teachings of wasathoy Islam. This article discusses Muhammad Imarah's thoughts on the fiqh of moderation. This research is literature and qualitative. Data collection is carried out through a literature review and analyzed descriptively. The results of the study concluded that about moderation fiqh, Muhammad Imarah argued that moderate ijtihad needs to be developed for now. Muhammad Imarah stated that the relationship between text and ijtihad is always side by side (al-talazum wa al musahabah daiman wa abadan), there is a text, there is ijtihad and ijtihad departs from the text, and ijtihad is to peel the meaning contained in a text to decide the fiqh law of the text. The fiqh verdict is subjective because it takes the form of conjecture (al-dhan).
Co-Authors Ahmad Hasan al-Banna Hammis Syafaq