Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Aktivisme: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Politik dan Sosial Indonesia Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Trianda Lestari
Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Tinjauan Pemahaman Masyarakat Terhadap Pidana Politik Uang Pada Pemilu Trianda Lestari; Syahrando Muhti; Siti Nurhaliza; Dewi Haryanti
Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): April : Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/humif.v1i2.161

Abstract

Money politics is a gift or promise to bribe someone so that the person does not exercise their rights in a certain way during the general election. The purchase can be in the form of goods or money, as found by researchers regarding the phenomenon of money politics which is still widespread in three regions, namely , Kijang Bintan, Kawal Bintan, and Lingga, people who are still relatively ignorant and have economic constraints are one of the factors in society being entangled in giving and receiving political money. Apart from damaging democracy due to forms of fraud, this problem has a negative impact on the givers and recipients who have clearly violated the provisions of the election law and violated criminal provisions. However, this problem is still difficult to resolve due to the lack of supervision and firm action. This research uses empirical legal research. This research is a legal research method that uses empirical facts taken from people's behavior, both verbally obtained from interviews and behavior carried out through direct observation. The theory used in this research is not to use critical legal theory, in order to find the problems that occur, as well as reveal how much the public understands money politics. So from these problems it can be drawn with the title Review of Community Understanding of Money Politics
Perbandingan Hukum Penanaman Modal dan Investasi Di Indonesia dan Di Tiongkok Reky Yuliansyah; Trianda Lestari; Syahrando Muhti
Aktivisme: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Politik dan Sosial Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Juli : Aktivisme : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Politik dan Sosial Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aktivisme.v1i3.350

Abstract

Indonesia and China are two countries with rapidly developing economies in Southeast Asia. These two countries have great potential to attract foreign investment. However, there are differences in investment and foreign investment regulations in the two countries. This research aims to compare investment and foreign investment laws in Indonesia and China. This research uses normative legal research methods with a comparative approach. Research data was obtained from literature studies, namely laws, government regulations and other related literature. The research results show that there are similarities and differences in foreign investment and investment regulations in Indonesia and China. Similarities include, recognition of the rights of foreign investors; providing incentives for foreign investors; and resolving investment disputes. The differences include the subject of investment, business fields open to foreign investment, investment requirements. From this research, researchers can draw the title, namely Comparison of investment law and foreign investment in Indonesia and China
Analisis Kasus Wanprestasi Antara Debitur Dan Kreditur Terhadap Perjanjian Pinjaman Kredit Bank Studi Kasus Putusan (Nomor 5/PDT.G.S/2023/PN.BTG) Trianda Lestari; Syahrando Muhti; Muhamad Fatur Rahman Bey Husdi
Terang : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Maret : Terang : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/terang.v1i1.76

Abstract

A broken promise or default is a situation where a debtor is unable to fulfill his obligations in accordance with the debt and receivable agreement he made, for example not making installments or repayment on time. As in article 13138 of the Civil Code which states "All agreements made in accordance with law apply as law for those who make them. This agreement cannot be withdrawn other than by agreement of both parties, or for reasons determined by law, the agreement must be carried out in good faith. In this paper, the problem is regarding the bank credit payment agreement made between the debtor and the creditor in the contents of the agreement that has been given by agreement between the parties given a period of time by the creditor to the debtor, but the debtor is negligent and does not pay compensation even though it has been billed and a summons has been given. or a warning, so that the debtor files a lawsuit. The theory in this research uses contract law theory which regulates agreements and methods using normative legal research methods which refer to court decisions and statutory regulations. So the title that the researcher will discuss is the analysis of cases of default between debtors and creditors regarding bank credit loan agreements, case study decision number 51/PDT.G.S/2023/PN.BTG
Co-Authors Dewi Haryanti Muhamad Fatur Rahman Bey Husdi Reky Yuliansyah Siti Nurhaliza Syahrando Muhti