Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ikhtisar: Jurnal Pengetahuan Islam Spektra : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial
Muhid Muhid
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Pemikiran Ibnu Taimiyah Terhadap Makna Majaz Dalam Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis Muhid Muhid; Muhammad Sulaiman Hasyim
Ikhtisar: Jurnal Pengetahuan Islam Vol 4 No 1 (2024): Ikhtisar: Jurnal Pengetahuan Islam
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55062//IJPI.2024.v4i1/456/5

Abstract

This article analyzes Ibn Taymiyah's thoughts on the meaning of majaz in the Qur'an and hadith. The meaning of majaz is something that is considered very important in understanding the verses of the Qur'an and hadith, but its existence has actually reaped many pros and cons among the scholars because many are considered to be overusing the meaning of majaz to the point that it takes away from the intended meaning of a lafadz. Ibn Taymiyah was one of the ulama' who rejected the meaning of majaz and even wanted to close the doors of majaz altogether, which made quite a few ulama' oppose and even disbelieve his creed. In this research, the author uses library research methods by referring to Ibn Taimiyah's main work, namely Majmū’ al-Fatāwā, which contains fatwas and his thoughts, including the meaning of majaz in understanding the Qur'an and hadith. This article focuses on Ibn Taimiyah's thoughts and the comments of the ulama' towards him who rejected the meaning of majaz in understanding the Qur'an and hadith. Tulisan ini menganalisis tentang pemikiran Ibnu Taimiyah terhadap pemaknaan majaz dalam al-Qur’an dan hadis. Pemaknaan majaz merupakan hal yang dianggap sangat penting dalam memahami ayat al-Qur’an maupun hadis, namun keberadaannya justru menuai banyak pro-kontra diantara para ulama’ karena banyak yang dianggap berlebihan dalam menggunakan makna majaz sampai membuatnya keluar dari maksud yang dituju dari suatu lafadz. Ibnu Taimiyah merupakan salah satu ulama’ yang menolak adanya pemaknaan majaz bahkan ingin menutup pintu majaz secara keseluruhan, yang membuat tidak sedikit ulama’ menentang bahkan mengkafirkan akidahnya. Dalam penelitian ini, penulis menggunakan metode penelitian kepustakaan (library research) dengan merujuk kepada karya utama dari Ibnu Taimiyah yakni Majmū’ al-Fatāwā yang berisi tentang fatwa-fatwa dan pemikirannya termasuk dalam pemaknaan majaz dalam memahami al-Qur’an maupun hadis. Tulisan ini berfokus pada pemikiran Ibnu Taimiyah serta komentar para ulama’ terhadapnya yang menolak makna majaz dalam memahami al-Qur’an maupun hadis.
Metodologi Kajian Islam; Perspektif Ibrahim M. Abu Rabi’ Anggun Imanto; Mohamad Fatkhul Choiri; Suswanto Suswanto; Muhid Muhid; Kasuwi Saiban
Spektra: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Vol 5 No 2 (2023): Spektra : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial
Publisher : Fakultas Agama Islam Universitas Islam As Syafi'iyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34005/spektra.v5i2.2404

Abstract

Islamic studies (dirosah islamiyyah) should be carried out and developed dynamically like scientific studies in general. But unfortunately on the contrary, Islamic studies seem to have stagnated or not experienced significant progress amidst various social issues that continue to develop. Even when there are Islamic studies conducted by Muslim insiders, they often appear dull and poor in approach and methodology. Islamic studies should be open to the methods and approaches currently being developed. Ibrahim M. Abu Rabi tries to open up this void through his study of the history of Islamic thought and awakens intellectuals so that they fully understand the role and importance of advancing Islamic studies. The scientific opinion is currently being developed. Problems that are increasingly complicated and complex cannot be explained satisfactorily by classical Islamic research theories that rely solely on textual research. According to him, Islamic studies must be open to contemporary scientific disciplines.
Co-Authors Anggun Imanto Kasuwi Saiban Mohamad Fatkhul Choiri Muhammad Sulaiman Hasyim Suswanto Suswanto