Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN HASIL EKSTRAKSI KADAR ASPAL PADA CAMPURAN ASPAL AC-BC TERHADAP DESIGN MIX FORMULA Agung Wahyudi; Marwan Lubis; M Husni Malik Hasibuan
Jurnal Teknik Sipil Vol 2, No 1 (2023): Edisi Juni
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30743/jtsip.v2i1.7651

Abstract

Kadar aspal merupakan salah satu faktor yang amat penting diperhatikan untuk mencapai umur maksimal suatu jalan, dalam pelaksanaan perkerasan jalan dapat terjadi penurunan kadar aspal  yang akan mempengaruhi peningkatan kualitas jalan, metode pada penelitian ini dengan cara Ekstraksi, Ekstraksi adalah pemisahan campuran dua atau lebih bahan dengan cara menambahkan pelarut yang bisa melarutkan salah satu bahan yang ada dalam campuran tersebut, pengujian ini menggunakan alat Centrifuge Ekstractor pada empat benda uji yaitu benda uji yang berasal dari Asphalt Mixing Plant, campuran aspal yang berasal dari belakang mesin Asphalt Finisher, campuran aspal yang di ambil dari belakang Dump Truck dan hasil pemadatan yang di ambil menggunakan Core Drill dengan menggunakan pelarut pertalite. Penelitian ini memiliki  tujuan untuk mengetahui penurunan nilai kadar aspal pada campuran Asphalt Concrete- Binder Course (AC-BC) pada proyek Preservasi Jalan dengan cara melakukan pengujian ekstaksi aspal yang dapat digunakan sebagai Quality Control dan pemeriksaan campuran aspal di lapangan. Pengujian ekstaksi. Hasil nilai kadar aspal mengacu pada Spesifikasi Umum Tahun 2018 Revisi 2 bahwa untuk pengujian ekstraksi harus menggunakan benda uji campuran beraspal yang masih berwujud gembur. Nilai kadar aspal pada campuran dengan batas toleransi ± 0,3% dari berat total campuran. Setelah mendapatkan hasil pengujian kita bisa mengetahui apakah kadar aspal dilapangan sesuai dengan kadar aspal Design Mix Formula (DMF).
Analisis Deteksi Kedalaman Retak Pada Beton Mengunakan Metode UPV Testing: Studi Penelitian Rifdah Mufiidah Harahap; Darlina Tanjung; M Husni Malik Hasibuan; Marwan Lubis
Konstruksi: Publikasi Ilmu Teknik, Perencanaan Tata Ruang dan Teknik Sipil Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): April: Konstruksi: Publikasi Ilmu Teknik, Perencanaan Tata Ruang dan Teknik Sip
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Ilmu Teknik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61132/konstruksi.v2i2.236

Abstract

Non-destructive tests are currently widely used in evaluating the quality of concrete installed in the field. One NDT is using the Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) method. In general, the use of UPV in concrete is to estimate concrete strength, determine the homogeneity of concrete and detect concrete damage, for example the presence of voids or cracks. This research is intended to determine the accuracy of UPV test results in detecting concrete cracks at several variations in crack depth. In this research, the UPV tool validation process was carried out by making 1 type of test object. Namely 1 beam specimen for testing crack depth (UPV) with 6 variations of artificial cracks where the artificial cracks are made using plywood. Each sample has been treated so that it can describe the crack depth according to the existing plan. In testing, it was found that the estimated crack depth in variation I was 33.2 mm deep, variation II was 18.8 mm deep, variation III was 104.4 mm deep, variation IV was 115.8 mm deep, variation V was 24.4 mm deep and variation VI 159.3 mm deep. And the average accuracy is 13.60%. The smaller the wave travel time, the smaller the crack depth, the smaller the wave emission and the longer the wave path to detect cracks. which means that the accuracy of UPV crack depth testing tends to decrease with the unevenness of the concrete surface.
Analisis Kuat Lekat Angkur Pada Beton Berdasarkan Variasi Bentuk Angkur Dengan Menggunakan Metode Pemasangan Cast In Place: Studi Penelitian Nur Sabrina Rambe; Darlina Tanjung; M Husni Malik Hasibuan; Afdhal Hubbig
Konstruksi: Publikasi Ilmu Teknik, Perencanaan Tata Ruang dan Teknik Sipil Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): April: Konstruksi: Publikasi Ilmu Teknik, Perencanaan Tata Ruang dan Teknik Sip
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Ilmu Teknik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61132/konstruksi.v2i2.237

Abstract

An anchor is a steel element that is embedded in concrete when it is cast (cast in place) or installed later (post-installed) into concrete that has hardened and is used to distribute loads (tension and shear) acting on the concrete (SNI 2847:2019). The use of anchors in the world of construction is increasingly popular to help connect concrete structures. The installation of anchors has progressed from the initial anchors being installed before casting the concrete (cast in place), progressing to the anchors being installed after the concrete has hardened (post installed) by drilling. By drilling into concrete, installing and removing anchors becomes easier. Installation of cast-in-place anchors is generally used in the design of new construction, while post-installed anchor installation is generally used in old construction for repairs or retrofitting. Anchors have several variations including hed heax, L bolt and J bolt anchor variations, but it is not yet known which anchor variation has a greater bond strength value, what are the results of the comparison of bond strength values ​​for each variation of anchor and what are the differences in the anchor bond strength capacity for each variation? the anchor. With this research, it is hoped that we can find out the bond strength and bond stress values ​​for each variation of anchor so that the comparison of the bond strength of the anchor can answer the differences in capacity of each variation of the anchor as well. Research on the bond strength of anchors based on variations in anchor shape using the cast in place method shows that the bond strength value shown at the highest loading value is the type J anchor variation with an average load of 27,816 kN, the type L anchor variation with an average load of 26,971 kN and variations of the hex head type anchor with an average load of 12.85 kN. It can be concluded that the stress value is directly proportional to the loading value. The greater the loading value, the greater the bond stress value. The highest bond stress value is found in the type J anchor variation with an average bond stress value of 151,397 Mpa, in the L type anchor variation with an average bond stress value of 147,798 Mpa and in the hex head type anchor variation with an average bond stress value of 69.953 Mpa, so the bond stress is directly proportional to the loading value.