Rudijanto, Maria Natasha
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Tantangan dan Potensi Peradilan Adat sebagai Access to Justice melalui Pengakuan Hukum Adat dalam UUD 1945 Aurelia, Jessica; Rudijanto, Maria Natasha; Putri, Audrey Bilbina; Felicia, Gladys; Peters, Raphaellee; Neltje, Jeane
Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Vol 10 No 8 (2024): Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan
Publisher : Peneliti.net

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11108866

Abstract

This research examines the challenges and potential of customary courts as an access to justice for indigenous peoples through public services related to the recognition of the existence of customary law in the 1945 Constitution. Customary justice is a traditional legal system that still plays an important role in the lives of indigenous peoples in Indonesia. However, customary justice faces a number of challenges in integrating itself with the national legal framework, especially in the context of the recognition of customary law in the 1945 Constitution. This research will identify the obstacles faced by customary courts in providing access to justice for indigenous peoples, and analyze the potentials that can be utilized to enhance the role of customary courts as effective and inclusive justice institutions. The results of this research can provide useful insights in developing policies and strategies to strengthen customary courts as an integral part of the Indonesian legal system.
Pemikiran Filsafat Hukum tentang Keseimbangan Kebebasan Individu dan Keamanan Nasional dalam Hak Asasi Manusia Rudijanto, Maria Natasha; Rasji, Rasji; Aurelia, Jessica
Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Vol 10 No 8 (2024): Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan
Publisher : Peneliti.net

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11118716

Abstract

Thinking in legal philosophy about the balance between individual freedom and national security in the context of human rights is an important debate in a democratic society. This study formulates the main problem with a focus on legal philosophy thinking on the concept of balance between individual freedom and national security and the policies that can be adopted by the government to maintain the balance. The article presents a review of the various perspectives and theories that underpin different approaches to this issue. While some views emphasize the importance of protecting individual rights as the foundation of democracy, others underline the need for strong measures to safeguard national security. The article also analyzes the various policies that can be pursued by the government to maintain such a balance, seeking common ground between the protection of human rights and the measures necessary to protect state security. It highlights the importance of legal philosophy thinking in guiding fair and balanced policymaking in the context of human rights