Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Arjuna : Publikasi Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Matematika Bhinneka: Jurnal Bintang Pendidikan dan Bahasa
Nadiyah Khairiyah
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Education Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) Berbasis Berpikir Kritis pada Mata Pelajaran PPKn di Kelas III MIN 3 Simalungun Nadiyah Khairiyah; Auffah Yumni; Safran Safran
Jurnal Arjuna : Publikasi Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Matematika Vol. 2 No. 6 (2024): Desember : Jurnal Arjuna : Publikasi Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Matematika
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61132/arjuna.v2i6.1279

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of critical thinking-based Learner Worksheets (LKPD) in Civics subjects in Class III MIN 3 Simalungun. The background is that the Learner Worksheet used at MIN 3 Simalungun is an instant version of the publisher provided by the school not the result of the preparation carried out by the teacher himself. And printed with black ink on opaque paper. LKPDs found in schools are not yet based on critical thinking. Indicators of critical thinking have not been included in the LKPD, so it does not train students' critical thinking skills. This research is an R&D (Research and Development) study. This study uses the ADDIE development model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation). Researchers only limit it to the development stage. Researchers modify the development model as needed, because in terms of the formulation of the problem it is only limited to whether or not the LKPD will be developed. So, for this reason, researchers do not carry out the implementation and evaluation stages. Based on the results obtained after being validated by validators from 3 teams of experts, namely from material experts, a percentage of 94% was obtained which was declared very feasible. The assessment of the media expert showed a percentage of 88%, also declared very feasible. In addition, the assessment of linguists obtained a percentage of 86% and was declared very feasible. So it can be concluded
Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Peserta Didik dalam Pembelajaran Aktif di Sekolah Dasar Nadiyah Khairiyah; Khalis Salsabilla; Putri Akhriyani Siregar; Zulfa Zachri Wahyudi; Kartika Abriana Br Sembiring
Bhinneka: Jurnal Bintang Pendidikan dan Bahasa Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Januari: Bhinneka
Publisher : Universitas Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59024/bhinneka.v2i1.630

Abstract

Each student has different abilities. There are students who can achieve it without difficulty, but quite a few students experience difficulties in learning. Several problems were found among students, such as laziness, easily discouraged, indifferent, accompanied by an attitude of opposition to teachers, which were part of students' learning problems. This article discusses the analysis of students' learning difficulties in active learning in elementary schools. The aim of this article is to gain a better understanding of what components influence students' ability to use active learning approaches in elementary schools optimally. The method used in this article is a qualitative method with a literature study approach. In reality, each student is often unable to achieve their learning goals or does not achieve changes in behavior as expected, this can indicate that students often experience learning difficulties and this is an obstacle in achieving learning outcomes at school. By knowing students' learning difficulties, they can of course identify and overcome these difficulties by looking for information about their learning problems, adjusting learning methods, providing additional support and using active learning strategies.
Co-Authors Auffah Yumni Kartika Abriana Br Sembiring Khalis Salsabilla Putri Akhriyani Siregar Safran Safran Zulfa Zachri Wahyudi