Jurnal Konstitusi
Vol 10, No 1 (2013)

Implikasi Re-Eksistensi Tap Mpr dalam Hierarki peraturan perundang- Undangan terhadap Jaminan atas Kepastian Hukum yang adil di Indonesia

Dian Agung Wicaksono (Bagian Hukum Tata Negara, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta Jl. Sosio Justicia Nomor 1 Bulaksumur, Sleman, D.I. Yogyakarta 55281)

Article Info

Publish Date
20 May 2016

Abstract

Post-enactment of Act Nr. 12 of 2011, MPR Decree was put again the hierarchy of legislation, which cause problems in the context of the state of law of Indonesia. This was normative legal research. Now, the number of MPR Decree is only 6 decrees remaining, so re-existence and placement of MPR Decree is not relevant. Hierarchy should be made by simplification approach by reducing the nomenclature of law in the hierarchy of legislation. MPR Decree should have not been included in the hierarchy, especially under the Constitution. If the MPR Decree still be placed under the Constitution, we need to hold the mechanism to review MPR Decree, if there is a contradiction with the Constitution or the restriction of human rights, which actually should not be limited by the MPR.

Copyrights © 2016




Citation Download
RIS
EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite
BibTex
Latex, Jabref
Full PDF
536.967 KB
Original Source
Download Original
Google Scholar
Check in Google Scholar
Journal Info
Jurnal Konstitusi
Website

Abbrev

jk

Publisher

Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Subject

Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Description

The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Constitutional Law and another ...