<![CDATA[Tujuan penelitian menganalisis keberlakuan hukum putusan arbitrase Badan penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen, Tipe penelitian yang digunakan ialah penelitian normatif empiris, kemudian dilakukan analisa kualitatif Hasil Penelitian penulis mendapatkan bahwaEfektifitas penyelesaian sengketa konsumen melalui arbitrase kurang efektif karena penyelesaian dengan cara arbitrase dapat dianulir dengan pelaku usaha mengajukan keberataanya lewat pengadilan negeri tempat di mana konsumen bertempat tinggal. Sehingga ini akan menyebabkan peluang hukum yang dapat menunda keberlakuaan putusan arbitrase yang telah ditetapkan BPSK sebagai badan yang ditunjuk serta diakui oleh undang-undang sebagai quasi peradilan (badan yang menjalankan fungsi Pengadilan). The research objective is to analyze the legal enforceability of arbitration decisions by the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency. The type of research used is empirical normative research, and then a qualitative analysis is carried out. The research results of the author find that the effectiveness of resolving consumer disputes through arbitration is less effective because settlement by arbitration can be annulled by the business actor submitting an objection through the district court where the consumer resides. So this will create legal opportunities that can delay the validity of arbitration decisions that have been determined by BPSK as an appointed body and recognized by law as quasi-judicial (a body that carries out the functions of a court).]]>
Copyrights © 2023
