cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel
ISSN : 24605565     EISSN : 25031058     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 10 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Juni 2021" : 10 Documents clear
Penegakan Hukum terhadap Gerakan Ekstremisme yang Beredar di Indonesia Perspektif Fikih Jinayah: Studi Kasus FPI Novita Setyowati; Muhammad Irfan Syaifuddin; Nofi Mardani; Nurul Isnawati
Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Juni 2021
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Pidana Islam Fakultas Syari’ah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research was conducted to analyze cases that occured with the FPI object, in order to get a bright spot on law enforcement. The murder case of 6 members of the FPI group is still in the process of being investigated, so there are several possibilities for law enforcement that might apply. Prior to this case, FPI was also often involved in extreme anarchist acts, and the people who saw it would call it aradical group. Based on a series of cases that occurred which of course involved FPI with residents, the community, and security forces. There are 3 possible articles of law enforcement in Indonesia that will apply according to UU, namely article 383 of the Criminal Code regarding accidental disappearances, and Article 340 of the Criminal Code regarding premeditated murder, as well as Article 170 of the Criminal Code regarding acts of violence. The perspective that the writer will aim at is the perspective of Jinayah Jurisprudence. So, if the law enforcement is brought to the realm of the jinayah, there are also several kinds of choices of law, namely qis}a>s} if it is proven to kill deliberately and deliberately. The next choices of law is to pay diyah if it is accidental, and also kaffarah, namely relief from Diyat.
Analisis Sanksi Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 Ditinjau dari Konsep Ta’zir dalam Fikih Jinayah Intan Nur Fadilla; Arif Dian Santoso
Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Juni 2021
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Pidana Islam Fakultas Syari’ah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In fiqh jinayah, criminal sanctions for corruptors are included in the ta'zir punishment adjusted to the decision of ulul 'amri based on several considerations because several jarimah are relevant to the concept of corruption, jarimah ghulul and al-rishwah. The Supreme Court formulates sentencing guidelines for judges. It issues them into Supreme Court regulations (PERMA) Number 1 of 2020 to realize legal certainty, justice, and proportional benefits in imposing crimes against perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption. This paper aims to identify and analyze the application of ta’zir in the sentencing guidelines issued by the Supreme Court from the perspective of fiqh jinayah by prioritizing the benefit of the people. The research method used in this study uses normative legal research, and it can be concluded: 1. Criminal sanctions commonly applied by the jarimah ta’zir are imprisonment and a fine formulated in PERMA Number 1 of 2020. 2. The guidelines for punishment in the Supreme Court regulations are by the concept of ta’zir because criminal sanctions are determined proportionally based on several considerations, namely the criteria for the high and low impact of the act and The profit obtained by the perpetrator determines the size of the criminal sanction imposed by the judge.
Konsepsi Fiqh Jinayah dalam Merumuskan Sanksi Hukum Pembunuhan Mutilasi Ahmad Ropei
Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Juni 2021
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Pidana Islam Fakultas Syari’ah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Among the serious problems facing society is murder accompanied by mutilation. This paper aims to describe the jinayah fiqh conception of mutilation and its legal sanctions. The results of this paper indicate that mutilation is murder which is followed by dismembering the limb of the victim. In positive criminal law, mutilation is charged under Article 340 of the Criminal Code with the threat of alternative sanctions, namely the death penalty or life imprisonment, or for a specified period of up to twenty years. Murder of mutilation in the concept of jinayah fiqh is classified as deliberate killing (qatl al-'amd), this is based on the existence of an element of intentional intention (intention) as a key element for determining the radius of deliberate killing (qatl al-'amd). The punishment formulated for the perpetrator of deliberate murder is qisas, which is the death penalty as retribution for the perpetrator.
Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Penyalahgunaan Kegiatan Perbankan dalam Penghimpunan Dana Masyarakat oleh Koperasi: Studi Putusan Nomor 271/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Pti Muhammad Jazil Rifqi
Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Juni 2021
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Pidana Islam Fakultas Syari’ah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The existence of irregularities in banking activities carried out by non-bank institutions, in addition to violating applicable norms also results in losses for many people when there is embezzlement of funds. The juridical study of this literature research reveals that the implementation of criminal acts against violations of banking authority which in the judge's decision imposes criminal sanctions on cooperative leaders in the form of imprisonment for eleven years and an additional punishment in the form of a fine of ten billion provided that if not paid is replaced by imprisonment for six months economic offenses The judge's verdict which is more than the crimes committed by the perpetrator in harming society can be justified as stated in article 46 of the banking law. Non-bank institutions in the form of cooperatives in collecting public funds must obtain permission from the Minister of Cooperatives whose storage and use of funds is limited to their members, but if they carry out their services not from their members, it violates article 16 of the banking law. In addition, Article 59 of the Criminal Code also emphasizes that the leadership or management of a corporation that has a legal entity who commits a criminal act must bear the sanctions decided by the judge.
Komparasi Jinayat dengan Hukum Pidana Nasional dalam Penjatuhan Sanksi terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Harum Isnin; Indah Fitri Cahyani
Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Juni 2021
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Pidana Islam Fakultas Syari’ah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: Islamic law was accepted and developed in Indonesian society long before the arrival of western law by foreign invaders who controlled Indonesia. Most Indonesian Muslim people place Islamic law into the Indonesian legal system, which consists of Western criminal law, customary law, and Islamic legal systems. This article analyses the comparison between Islamic criminal law and Indonesian criminal law in determining sanctions providing a deterrent effect for criminals. Based on empirical legal research methods, it is found that there are similarities between Islamic criminal law and Indonesian criminal law in the form of purposes and principles. The crime conditions in Islamic criminal law are also the same as the offence contained in the national criminal code. The differences between the two laws are in the sources of law, the sanctions attached to each different offence, and the historical evolution that shape the criminal law. This research intends not to compare which crime is better but to find the ideal of criminal law for its betterment in human life.
Implikasi Kedudukan KPK Sebagai Rumpun Kekuasaan Eksekutif Berdasarkan Undang-undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 Miftakhur Rokhman Habibi
Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Juni 2021
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Pidana Islam Fakultas Syari’ah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The development of modern state administration constitutes new branches of power outside the Legislative, Executive and Judicial power, as well-known in the concept of “trias politica”. This branch of power is an Independent power with the emergence of a number of independent State commissions. In Indonesia, one such institution is the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). However, Law Number 19 of 2019 changed the KPK to become part of the executive power. So that, in this paper will discuss about the position of independent state institutions in a constitutional perspective and the implications of establishing the KPK as an executive body. This research is a normative research with the type of doctrinal research. The approach uses statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results show that independent power does exist in the modern constitutional perspective. However, the establishment of the KPK as an independent institution in the executive clump has several implications, including the transfer of KPK's responsibility to the President, the executive forming the Supervisory Board which regulates the work procedures of the KPK and the KPK becomes the object of the DPR's inquiry rights.
Pemidanaan Kepala Daerah yang Terduga Korupsi Akibat Operasi Tangkap Tangan oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Titik Triwulan Tutik
Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Juni 2021
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Pidana Islam Fakultas Syari’ah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Hand Arrest Operation (OTT) against Regional Heads suspected of committing criminal acts of corruption is a juridical authority given to the KPK in the context of efforts to eradicate corruption. OTT by the KPK can only be carried out with the following conditions: First, as long as there is “preliminary evidence”, “sufficient preliminary evidence”, and “sufficient evidence”. Second, continue to uphold human rights to the suspect. The prosecution of regional heads who are suspected of committing criminal acts of corruption through the KPK's Hand Arrest Operation (OTT) is carried out in three forms. First, the death penalty as regulated in Article 2 paragraph (2) of the 1999 PTPK Law in conjunction with the Corruption Act 2001. Second, imprisonment and fines, which are regulated in Article 5, Article 6, Article 7, Article 8, Article 9, Article 10, Article 11 and Article 12 of the Corruption Act 1999 in conjunction with the Corruption Act 2001. Apart from that, it is also provided for in Article 55 Paragraph 1 to 1 of the Criminal Code. Third, the additional penalty for substitute money is regulated in the Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2014 concerning the additional penalty for Corruption Crimes. Given that corruption is an extraordinary crime and its prevention requires special steps. Therefore, it is necessary to synchronize the rule of law between the Criminal Procedure Code and the Corruption Act in supporting the existing legal system to be more effective.
Studi Pemikiran Abdullah Ahmed An-Naim tentang Hukum Pidana Islan dan HAM M Sulthon
Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Juni 2021
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Pidana Islam Fakultas Syari’ah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The preliminary finding of this research acourding An-Naim is the contradiction between Islamic law and human rights caused by philosophy and tendancy of law. Islamic law is based on revelation, meanwhile the human rights on human experience. Islamic law emphasizes to the collective protection aspect, but the human rights concern to oneself interest. Islamic Criminal Law is not only to protrude its sanction aspect, but also to see the positive’s that’s social benefit..The above research found to respond the main problem of law Islamic criminal according An-Naim to the perspective of human rights. Sanction of dead punishment has been applied in Indonesia law sanction, while punishmen sanction of hand cutting and beating is not yet applied. On the other hand, the movement of human rights becomes stronger to refuse the implementation of islamic law sanction which is suppoused not relevance with the standard of human rights.This research position towards the anothers to strengthen the previous research, especially to strengthen the writing found ‘Topo Santoso’ that shows the priority of Islamic criminal law sanction.This research makes up normative and sociology’s. The analysis technique performed as descriptive analysis with the method : doctrine-comparative, analytic-deductive normative and analytic-inductive normative. Hence, the summary of this result study is withdrawn as deductive and inductive based on the data.
Telaah Pemikiran Muhaddithin dan Usuliyyin terhadap Hadith al-Jinayah sebagai Hujjah dalam Memutuskan Hukum Pidana Islam Abu Azam Al Hadi
Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Juni 2021
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Pidana Islam Fakultas Syari’ah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Al-hadith positions as the foundation of Islamic law does not cover all kinds and types of al-hadith, even though the Qur'an has shown its validity. The Ulama attitude toward al hadits is influenced by several factors. Some take all hadith as the basis for Islamic law (including determining the provisions of Islamic jinayah/criminal punishments), and some do not. Some ulama are critical of al-hadith as a rationale of the Islamic shari'ah argument, some are merely positive, and some reject a part of al-hadith as a basis. According to Ulama Muhaddistsun and Ushuliyyun, al-hadith al-maqbullah must be based on various criteria. It must be narrated by a narrator who is fair and dabit, there is no 'illah al-qadihah, and the narration is not experiencing shudud. Muhaddithun took the attitude to accept all hadith, whether authentic, hasan or da'if, all to be practised. On the other hand, the ushuliyyun take the basis of istinbat only on the proposition of hadith shahih or hasan as ma'mul bih. This attitude extends to al-hadith ghayr al-mutawatirah, which provides benefits for yaqin. According to them, if the hadith is ghayru ma'mul bih, it is rejected.  
The Problem of Violating The Law on Information and Electronic Transactions in Democracy Country Elva Imeldatur rohmah; Zainatul Ilmiyah; Mega Ayu Ningtyas
Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Juni 2021
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Pidana Islam Fakultas Syari’ah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions as amended by Law Number 19 of 2016 (ITE Law) is a law that regulates all matters concerning information technology applicable in Indonesia. As a democratic country, Indonesia upholds and respects freedom. In reality, the ITE Law creates many problems in the midst of society, because it is often used as a tool to limit freedom of speech and opinion. The results of this study indicate that the presence and implementation of the ITE Law which is considered to silence freedom of opinion and expression which is one of the pillars of democracy for social media users, is actually not all true. The existence of the ITE Law actually presses all parties to be more careful in their attitudes and expressions on social media. So that the negative impact or violation of the rights of freedom of others and other violations in the cyber world can be avoided. Then the freedom of opinion and expression can run well.  

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10

 1 

Filter by Year

2021 2021


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): Juni 2023 Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): Desember 2022 Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022): Juni 2022 Vol. 7 No. 2 (2021): Desember 2021 Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Juni 2021 Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020): Desember 2020 Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020): Juni 2020 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): Desember 2019 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019): Juni 2019 Vol 5 No 01 (2019): Juni Vol. 4 No. 2 (2018): Desember 2018 Vol. 4 No. 1 (2018): Juni 2018 Vol 4 No 02 (2018): Desember Vol 4 No 02 (2018): Desember Vol 4 No 1 (2018): Juni Vol. 3 No. 2 (2017): Desember 2017 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2017): Juni 2017 Vol 3 No 2 (2017): Desember Vol 3 No 1 (2017): Juni Vol. 2 No. 2 (2016): Desember 2016 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2016): Juni 2016 Vol 2 No 2 (2016): Desember Vol 2 No 1 (2016): Juni Vol. 1 No. 2 (2015): Desember 2015 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2015): Juni 2015 Vol 1 No 2 (2015): Desember Vol 1 No 2 (2015): Desember Vol 1 No 1 (2015): Juni More Issue