cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
M. Ramadhana Alfaris
Contact Email
widyayuridika@widyagama.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
widyayuridika@widyagama.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota malang,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Widya Yuridika
Published by Universitas Widyagama
ISSN : 26157586     EISSN : 26205556     DOI : -
Core Subject : Humanities, Art, Social,
Arts Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
WIDYA YURIDIKA: Jurnal Hukum, published by the Faculty of Law, Universitas Widyagama Malang, as a forum of scientific publications for legal scientists and humanities who have a concentration in the field of law and human rights. Widya Yuridika published two times annually, on June and December. Each of the issue has eight articles both on review and research article.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 167 Documents
 13   14   15   16   17 
Praktik Pemenuhan Kewajiban Kelaiklautan Kapal Kargo Oleh Pengangkut Terhadap Ancaman Cyberattack Stephen Wongso; Sinta Dewi Rosadi; Purnama Trisnamansyah; Fauzi Maulana Hakim
Widya Yuridika Vol 6, No 2 (2023): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Widya Gama Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31328/wy.v6i2.4242

Abstract

Cyberattack issue in the shipping industries which was happened through some incidents towards ships, made the protection of cargo owners need to be reviewed. The seaworthiness obligation which interpreted as a means for a vessel to be fit to face the foreseeable perils in a voyage, makes cyberattack create its own discourse. This should not be separated with the cyberattack threat which has not been understood as an ordinary peril of a voyage. Moreover, the regulations in Indonesia which does not adopt the Hague-Visby Rules 1924, makes the industry fully rely on the Indonesian Shipping Law as a legal basis. The normative juridical research method makes the emphasis of the research on the use of library sources. The research specification uses an analytical descriptive that describes a literature study on the obligation of seaworthiness in dealing with the threat of cyberattack both in practice and regulation. The results of this study found that, first, the implementation of due diligence by the carrier in order to fulfil its seaworthiness obligations must also be applied to deal with the threat of cyberattack. The nature of the cyberattack that attacks the ship's information systems and technology, should make this attack predictable in a voyage. Moreover, the carrier's compliance with the cyber risk management guidelines on the ship should make the carrier declared to have fulfilled its seaworthiness obligations. Second, there is a legal vacuum in Indonesian positive law in regulating seaworthiness obligations in the face of cyberattack threats. Moreover, the legal gap between Indonesia's positive law and the 1924 HVR makes it difficult for Indonesian practitioners to follow global standards.
Perlawanan Pihak Ketiga Pemegang Sertifikat Hak Pakai Atas Sita Eksekusi Tanah Sriwedari Azmi Hawari Sunny; Artaji Artaji; Betty Rubiati
Widya Yuridika Vol 6, No 2 (2023): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Widya Gama Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31328/wy.v6i2.4097

Abstract

Third party resistance according to Article 195 Paragraph (6) of HIR regulate the legal standing of the applicant party, namely based on rights of ownership. However, the Surakarta City Government filed a third party resistance based on the ownership of Right of Use. Therefore, this research aims to analyze the resistance of third party filed based in the ownership of Right of Use and the settlement of Sriwedari land dispute. This research is based on a normative juridical approach and then analyzed by qualitative juridical methods. The result of the research shows that a third party resistance based on the ownership of rights other than rights of ownership can be accepted as the legal standing of the party. However, the legal standing of the Surakarta City Government as applicant of third party resistance was not met subjective requirements. Futhermore, Sriwedari land disputes can be resolved through non-litigation dispute resolution by negotiation or mediation. Using this dispute resolutions, the parties obtain legal certainty in resolving Sriwedari disputes without any party feel defeated, minimize losses and social impacts.
Kedudukan dan Perlindungan Hukum Tenaga Bantu Intan Fradila Pancawati; Amanda Rizkina Wirawati; Andre Bagus Saputra; Nurmalita Ayuningtyas Harahap
Widya Yuridika Vol 6, No 2 (2023): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Widya Gama Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31328/wy.v6i2.4453

Abstract

The need for employees in government agencies is problematic due to the lack of recruitment formations for Civil Servants and Government Employees with Work Agreements (PPPK) causes the appointment of auxiliary employee through governor regulations in Yogyakarta Special Region to fill formations or positions in government administration. However, the existence of auxiliary staff employees is not clearly regulated in the employment law. Furthermore, it is needed to find the status, position and legal protection of Auxiliary Personel staff. This study aims to analyze, provide clarity and solutions regarding the status of the position and legal protection, based on Government Regulation No. 49 of 2018 concerning Management of Government Employees with Work Agreements in Yogyakarta Special Region. The method used in this research is empirical juridical by conducting interviews and statute approach. The conclusion of this study is that the Governor's Regulation on the Management of Auxiliary Personnel is invalid and null and void which resulted in unclear status and position of auxiliary staff within the Yogyakarta Special Region Government. Moreover, the legal protection for auxiliary personnel is not yet maximized and Auxiliary personnel should be given the same protection as PPPK for the same workload and work responsibilities.Kebutuhan akan pegawai di instansi pemerintah mengalami problematika dikarenakan kurangnya formasi recrutmen Pegawai Negeri Sipil dan Pegawai Pemerintah dengan Perjanjian Kerja (PPPK), hal ini menyebabkan Pemerintah Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta melalui peraturan gubernur melakukan pengangkatan tenaga bantu guna mengisi formasi atau jabatan dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan. Meskipun demikian sampai saat ini pegawai tenaga bantu keberadaannya tidak diatur secara jelas dalam aturan hukum kepegawaian, sehingga diperlukan untuk menegaskan status dan kedudukan serta perlindungan hukum bagi tenaga bantu itu sendiri. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan memberi kejelasan mengenai status kedudukan dan perlindungan hukum, berdasar Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 49 tahun 2018 tentang Manajemen Pegawai Pemerintah dengan Perjanjian Kerja serta memberikan solusi bagi permasalahan tenaga bantu Pemerintah Daerah Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu yuridis empiris dengan melakukan wawancara dan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini yaitu Peraturan Gubernur tentang Pengelolaan Tenaga Bantu adalah tidak sah dan batal demi hukum yang mengakibatkan tidak jelasnya status dan kedudukan tenaga bantu dilingkungan Pemerintah Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, dan perlindungan hukum kepada tenaga bantu belumlah maksimal karena masih terdapat ketidakpastian hukum bagi tenaga bantu yang mana seharusnya tenaga bantu memiliki perlindungan yang sama dengan PPPK karena memiliki beban kerja dan tanggungjawab kerja yang sama.
Perjanjian Utang Piutang Yang Terdapat Klausula Memberatkan Ahmad Fadly Haryadi; Nurfaidah Said; Marwah Marwah
Widya Yuridika Vol 6, No 2 (2023): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Widya Gama Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31328/wy.v6i2.4245

Abstract

Legal protection for debtors in debt agreements that contain burdensome clauses. This study aims to analyze the binding legal force of a debt agreement that contains onerous clauses. This research is normative juridical, by analyzing the applicable laws and regulations and other literature related to this research. The results of this study indicate that the contents of the debt agreement deed containing a burdensome clause on the debtor can be considered invalid and null and void by law. The act of agreement in providing guarantees in the form of land plot certificates is not accompanied by an APHT as stipulated in Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights on Land and Objects (UUHT) which makes pledging the land invalid and the creditor does not have the right to the collateral. In addition, the contents of the agreement have violated the provisions of the vervalbeding principle, namely in Article 6 of the agreement deed. But it does not necessarily delete the principal agreement and the debtor's obligation to pay off his debt to the creditor because based on the provisions of Article 1338 of the Civil Code, agreements made by the law, namely the legal terms of the agreement in Article 1320 of the Civil Code apply as a law for the parties who make it. Errors in doing the agreement deed so that there is a clause burdening the debtor makes the authentic deed of the agreement turn into a private act by the provisions of Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary Public (UUJN).
Batasan Penegak Hukum Dalam Mengakses Data Elektronik Pribadi Eunike Briliantin Rahantoknam
Widya Yuridika Vol 6, No 2 (2023): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Widya Gama Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31328/wy.v6i2.4118

Abstract

Personal data contains important information about that person. In Indonesia, there is still no beginning regarding the limitations of law enforcement in accessing personal data in the form of electronics. Only an explanation of some laws and regulations, but nothing in detail. Personal data is a person's privacy, not something that everyone can know, because it is personal, an example of personal data is ID cards. KTP is important for Indonesian citizens, because they declare themselves to be Indonesian citizens. Of course, with the development of the times, everything uses electronics, even ID cards are in electronic form, namely E-KTP. That way, people can access someone's personal data, including law enforcers who can't access someone's personal data not all of them, of course there are conditions if they want to access someone's personal data. Likewise, there is no clear provision regarding the limitations of access to personal data based on Permenkominfo 5/20 concerning Private Scope Electronic System Operators. Several statutory regulations that explain, namely the 1945 Constitution, Law Number 11 of 2008 jo. Law no. 19 of 2016 concerning information and electronic transactions and Permenkominfo 5/20. It is necessary to know that law enforcers in accessing a person's personal data must have a court decision.
Konstruksi Kewenangan Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat dalam Memberikan Keterangan pada Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi M. Adib Akmal Hamdi; Xavier Nugraha; Gio Arjuna Putra
Widya Yuridika Vol 6, No 2 (2023): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Widya Gama Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31328/wy.v6i2.4255

Abstract

In the light of this background, the focus of this article is on 3 (three) issues namely: the MPR's authority to interpret the constitution, the construction of ius constitutum providing statements by the MPR in reviewing laws in the Constitutional Court, and the reconstruction of the ius constituendum model of providing information on requests for review of laws law in the Constitutional Court. This article is a legal research with a reform-oriented research type with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. Based on this research, several things were found, namely: (1) the People’s Consultative Assembly has the authority to interpret the constitution based on Article 3 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia; (2) the construction of the ius constitutum position of the People’s Consultative Assembly in the petition for review of a law at the Constitutional Court is derogated by the exclusion of the MPR as giving explanation in Constitutional Court Law Number 6 Year 2005; (3) at the ius constituendum level, the involvement of the People’s Consultative Assembly in carrying out originalism interpretation of the constitution can be realized through the provision of explanation in a tripartite manner, namely the Government and/or the DPR as legislators and the People’s Consultative Assembly as the framers of the constitution. This article provides recommendations for the need to amend the provisions of the Constitutional Court's procedural law, so as to provide space for substantive participation for the MPR in providing an interpretation of its constitution.
Non-Fungible Token: Suatu Urgensi Serta Konstruksi Hukum Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perjanjian Cyndiarnis Cahyaning Putri
Widya Yuridika Vol 6, No 2 (2023): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Widya Gama Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31328/wy.v6i2.4120

Abstract

The development of investment law in Indonesia, especially in digital assets, has experienced significant developments. Non-Fungible Token (NFT) is a form of digital asset that is currently widely found in the community. However, from a legal perspective, there is no regulation on NFT and how the legality of NFT transactions is related to the use of cryptocurrencies in it. Having established from the background above, this research aims to analyze the urgency of regulating NFT and how basically the legal construction of the NFT in the contract law perspective. This research is normative research using statute and conceptual approaches. The results of the study finds that the urgency of regulating the legal construction of NFT transactions in Indonesia is to provide legal certainty to investors and is related to the legality of NFT transactions in Indonesia if it is associated with the validity of cryptocurrencies. The legal construction of NFT transactions in Indonesia is that the construction is not a sale and purchase agreement, but instead the legal construction refers to exchange agreement as stated in Article 1541 BW whereas cryptocurrency and NFT here will be given extensive meaning as goods in order to comply with the provisions of Article 1320 of BW to fulfill the objective requirements, in particular, the halal cause.

Page 17 of 17 | Total Record : 167

 13   14   15   16   17 

Filter by Year

2018 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 6, No 2 (2023): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum Vol 6, No 1 (2023): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum Vol 5, No 2 (2022): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum Vol 5, No 1 (2022): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Widya Yuridika, Periode Juni 2021 Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum Vol 3, No 2 (2020): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum Vol 3, No 1 (2020): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum Vol 2, No 2 (2019): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum Vol 2, No 1 (2019): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum Vol 1, No 2 (2018): Widya Yuridika, Periode Desember, 2018 Vol 1, No 2 (2018): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum Vol 1, No 1 (2018): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum More Issue