cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dr. Ide Bagus Siaputra
Contact Email
-
Phone
+62312981246
Journal Mail Official
anima@unit.ubaya.ac.id
Editorial Address
Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Surabaya Jalan Raya Rungkut Mejoyo (Raya Kali Rungkut), Surabaya, East Java, 60293
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal
Published by Universitas Surabaya
ISSN : 02150158     EISSN : 26205963     DOI : https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj
Core Subject : Social,
Social Sciences
Anima publishes peer reviewed articles with editors and consultants providing detailed assistance for authors to reach publication. Anima publishes research reports and scientific papers in psychology and/or related sciences with the aim to advance science, knowledge, and theory of psychology.
Arjuna Subject : Psikologi - Psikologi (Lain-Lain)
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 31 No. 2 (2016): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 31, No. 2, 2016)" : 5 Documents clear
Personality Profile Differences Between Prisoners and Non-Prisoners Using the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) Widhi Adhiatma; Magdalena S. Halim
ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal Vol. 31 No. 2 (2016): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 31, No. 2, 2016)
Publisher : Laboratory of General Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (346.43 KB) | DOI: 10.24123/aipj.v31i2.568

Abstract

Prison provides correctional function for prisoners. There are some factors needed to be considered to enable the correctional process work optimally, one of them is the personality of prisoners. We need to consider this because there are different kinds of prisoners with different criminal backgrounds. This study aimed to identify the personality profiles of prisoners, including violent offenders, non-violent offenders and drug offenders, using the Indonesian version of Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). We compared the personality profiles of the prisoners’ groups with the non-prisoner’s group in order to have more accurate personality profiles. The samples consisted of groups of violent offenders (n = 96, mean age = 27.99 years old), non-violent offenders (n = 79, mean age = 35.55 years old), drug offenders (n = 180, mean age = 32.90 years old), and non-prisoners (n = 245, mean age = 23.31 years old). Analyses using a series of One-Way ANOVA at the level of domains and facets of personality showed differences in the personality profiles of the three groups of prisoners and non-prisoner. In comparison to the non-prisoner group, the drug offender group was found having the largest number of differences in the personality profiles, whilst the non-violent offender group had the least number of personality profile differences.
Rethinking Radical Inclusiveness: A Theoretical Provocation Teguh Wijaya Mulya
ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal Vol. 31 No. 2 (2016): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 31, No. 2, 2016)
Publisher : Laboratory of General Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (224.871 KB) | DOI: 10.24123/aipj.v31i2.564

Abstract

The notions of human rights and identity politics have been widely drawn on in the contemporary understandings and practices of developing more inclusive cities. Examining the UN Habitat III Issue Paper on Inclusive Cities (2015), in this article I attempt to identify and problematize some assumptions that might have underpinned our efforts to improve the inclusiveness of our cities. I argue that a liberal view of human being has constrained the understandings about who “everyone” is, the nature of their sense of self, and what they want; which subsequently might exclude and marginalise those who do not fit our conceptions. Alternatively, I will draw on poststructuralist theorisation of discourse and subjectivity to offer a new way of thinking about human rights and identity politics, and discuss how it might contribute to our understanding and practices of inclusiveness.
Construct Validation of Five Love Languages Edwin Adrianta Surijah; Yashinta Levy Septiarly
ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal Vol. 31 No. 2 (2016): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 31, No. 2, 2016)
Publisher : Laboratory of General Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (498.178 KB) | DOI: 10.24123/aipj.v31i2.565

Abstract

Five Love Languages (FLL) is a theory proposed by Chapman (2010) about five ways a person feel most loved. This study was based on a lack of empirical evidence supporting the construct. Therefore, it aimed to validate five love languages and the results of this study were expected to be an empirical evidence to support Chapman’s idea. A Likert scale was constructed and tested toward 400 participants (148 males, 252 females; Mage = 19.85 years, SDage= 1.51 years). The FLL scale showed a promising composite reliability score ( .884) and satisfying item-total correlations (averagely > .250). Statistical analyses showed that there were 17 valid items in the Five Love Languages Scale. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the five factors in Chapman’s initial proposal.
It is Fear, Not Disgust, That Enhances Memory: Experimental Study on Students in Bandung KaYan KaYan; Henndy Ginting; Cakrangadinata Cakrangadinata
ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal Vol. 31 No. 2 (2016): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 31, No. 2, 2016)
Publisher : Laboratory of General Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (266.839 KB) | DOI: 10.24123/aipj.v31i2.566

Abstract

A number of research findings have found the impact of emotion on memory. Some researchers stated that disgust has more impact on memory, however according to the current study the effect of fear cannot be ignored. Both disgust and fear are examples of negative emotion that may have a significant influence on behavior, such as in the attempt of creating a healthy lifestyle. The current study involved an experiment where participants were asked to memorize and recall four randomly displayed picture categories that elicit emotions of disgust, fear, joy, and neutral emotion. They also filled out a DS-R (Disgust Scale-Revised) questionnaire and a supporting questionnaire about healthy lifestyle. Analysis of the results showed that disgust did not show an effect on memory, but fear instead did. This is related to the fact that most participants showed a low degree of disgust, and so it was not considered a significant emotion that affected memory compared to fear. In addition, physiologically fear and disgust are managed by different parts of the brain and thus it was assumed that they will have a different impact on memory. The findings implied that, in campaigning for a healthier lifestyle, fear emotion need to be instilled in people.
Predicting Innovative Behavior Among Employees in a Manufacturing Company: The Role of Psychological Capital Ika Zenita Ratnaningsih; Anggun Resdasari Prasetyo; Unika Prihatsanti
ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal Vol. 31 No. 2 (2016): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 31, No. 2, 2016)
Publisher : Laboratory of General Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (352.136 KB) | DOI: 10.24123/aipj.v31i2.567

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between psychological capital and workplace innovative behavior. The importance of innovative behavior in the competitive business world has been widely recognized. Previous studies have examined variables related to innovative behavior both at personal and organizational levels; however, there is a paucity of research looking at psychological capital as the predictor of workplace innovative behavior. In this study psychological capital and innovative behavior of 149 non-managerial employees in an apparel manufacture company were measured using Psychological Capital Scale (20 items, α = .872) and Innovative Behavior Scale (nine items, α = .874). The regression analysis shows a significant positive correlation between these two variables (r = .519, p < .01) and 27% of variance in innovative behavior can be explained from psychological capital. The results are discussed in relation to its theoretical contribution and practical implications in organizational contexts.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2016 2016


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 38 No. 2 (2023): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 38, No. 2, 2023) Vol. 38 No. 1 (2023): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 38, No. 1, 2023) Vol. 37 No. 2 (2022): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 37, No. 2, 2022) Vol. 37 No. 1 (2022): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 37, No. 1, 2022) Vol. 36 No. 2 (2021): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 36, No. 2, 2021) Vol. 36 No. 1 (2021): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 36, No. 1, 2021) Vol. 35 No. 2 (2020): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 35, No. 2, 2020) Vol. 35 No. 1 (2019): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 35, No. 1, 2019) Vol. 34 No. 4 (2019): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 34, No. 4, 2019) Vol. 34 No. 3 (2019): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 34, No. 3, 2019) Vol. 34 No. 2 (2019): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 34, No. 2, 2019) Vol. 33 No. 4 (2018): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 33, No. 4, 2018) Vol. 34 No. 1 (2018): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 34, No. 1, 2018) Vol. 33 No. 3 (2018): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 33, No. 3, 2018) Vol. 33 No. 2 (2018): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 33, No. 2, 2017) Vol. 33 No. 1 (2017): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 33, No. 1, 2017) Vol. 32 No. 4 (2017): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 32, No. 4, 2017) Vol. 32 No. 3 (2017): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 32, No. 3, 2017) Vol. 32 No. 2 (2017): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 32, No. 2, 2017) Vol. 32 No. 1 (2016): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 32, No. 1, 2016) Vol. 31 No. 4 (2016): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 31, No. 4, 2016) Vol. 31 No. 3 (2016): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 31, No. 3, 2016) Vol. 31 No. 2 (2016): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 31, No. 2, 2016) Vol. 31 No. 1 (2015): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 31, No. 1, 2015) Vol. 30 No. 4 (2015): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 30, No. 4, 2015) Vol. 30 No. 3 (2015): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 30, No. 3, 2015) Vol. 30 No. 2 (2015): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 30, No. 2, 2015) Vol. 30 No. 1 (2014): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 30, No. 1, 2014) Vol. 29 No. 4 (2014): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 29, No. 4, 2014) Vol. 29 No. 3 (2014): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 29, No. 3, 2014) Vol. 29 No. 2 (2014): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 29, No. 2, 2014) Vol. 29 No. 1 (2013): ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal (Vol. 29, No. 1, 2013) More Issue