cover
Contact Name
Ridwan Arifin
Contact Email
ulj.journal@mail.unnes.ac.id
Phone
+6281225294499
Journal Mail Official
ulj.journal@mail.unnes.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jalan Kampus Timur, Gedung K, Kampus Sekaran Gunungpati, Semarang
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Unnes Law Journal
ISSN : 22526536     EISSN : 27224503     DOI : https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj
Core Subject : Social,
Unnes Law Journal (Unnes L.J.) is a double-blind peer-reviewed legal journal (ISSN Print 2252-6536 ISSN Online 2722-4503) publishes research and review papers concerning to Legal Studies. Unnes L.J. published biannually by the Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang on April & October. Focus and Scope of Unnes L.J. are concerning (but are not limited to): Criminal Law, Private Law, Administrative Law, International Law, Procedure Law, Tax Law, Customary Law, Islamic Law, Environmental Law, State Administrative Law, Law Land, Insurance Law, Law and Human Rights, Politics of Law, Sociology of Law, Anthropology of Law, Philosophy of Law, Agrarian Law, Forestry Law, Law of the Seas, Ocean Law, Climate Change Law, Maritime Law, Diplomatic Law, Humanitarian Law, Special Criminal Law, Economic Law, Business Law, Consumer Protection Law, Intellectual Property Rights Law, Capital Market Law, Comparative Law, Regional Financial Law, Regional Autonomy Law, Sharia Economic Law, Health Law, Law and Society, Law and Forensics, Criminology, Victimology, Penitentiary Law, Law and Technology, Law and Gender Studies, and other related issues on Law in broader aspects (including Social, Economic, Politic, Security, Education, and Culture).
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 12 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 5 No 1 (2019): Unnes L.J. (April, 2019)" : 12 Documents clear
Effect of Taxpayer Data and Information Confidentiality Principle on Tax Amnesty Against Law Enforcement in Indonesia Damayanti, Ratih
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 5 No 1 (2019): Unnes L.J. (April, 2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v5i1.28980

Abstract

The principle of confidentiality in the Tax Amnesty can have a negative impact, the impact of which may occur frauds by individual taxpayers and tax officials. If there is fraud, the process of investigation and investigation to find evidence will be difficult. Law enforcement agencies and examining bodies such as the KPK, BPK, and other related agencies will have difficulties and will not be able to break through taxpayer assets or data because these assets and data are private and protected by law. This can hamper the law enforcement process, especially law enforcement in the tax sector. The principle of confidentiality in Tax Amnesty has an effect on law enforcement. The principle of confidentiality in Tax Amnesty provides potential moral hazard. A moral hazard occurs because of the opportunities or opportunities that enable these actions to materialize. Opportunities for Fiscus and Taxpayers to meet in person. This has the potential to cause a gray area between the Taxpayer and the Fiscus which can cause moral hazard to the Taxpayer. The authority of the Fiscus is prone to be misused, so that it can lead to several criminal actions that can be carried out, namely embezzlement or corruption that can harm the country's finances. And when the crime occurs at a Tax Amnesty Taxpayer, it will be difficult to enforce the law because the data and information sourced from the Declaration and its attachments cannot be used as a basis for investigation, investigation, and / or criminal prosecution of the Taxpayer cannot be used as a taxpayer basis for investigation, investigation and / or criminal prosecution of taxpayers.
Effect of Taxpayer Data and Information Confidentiality Principle on Tax Amnesty Against Law Enforcement in Indonesia Damayanti, Ratih
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 5 No 1 (2019): Unnes L.J. (April, 2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v5i1.28980

Abstract

The principle of confidentiality in the Tax Amnesty can have a negative impact, the impact of which may occur frauds by individual taxpayers and tax officials. If there is fraud, the process of investigation and investigation to find evidence will be difficult. Law enforcement agencies and examining bodies such as the KPK, BPK, and other related agencies will have difficulties and will not be able to break through taxpayer assets or data because these assets and data are private and protected by law. This can hamper the law enforcement process, especially law enforcement in the tax sector. The principle of confidentiality in Tax Amnesty has an effect on law enforcement. The principle of confidentiality in Tax Amnesty provides potential moral hazard. A moral hazard occurs because of the opportunities or opportunities that enable these actions to materialize. Opportunities for Fiscus and Taxpayers to meet in person. This has the potential to cause a gray area between the Taxpayer and the Fiscus which can cause moral hazard to the Taxpayer. The authority of the Fiscus is prone to be misused, so that it can lead to several criminal actions that can be carried out, namely embezzlement or corruption that can harm the country's finances. And when the crime occurs at a Tax Amnesty Taxpayer, it will be difficult to enforce the law because the data and information sourced from the Declaration and its attachments cannot be used as a basis for investigation, investigation, and / or criminal prosecution of the Taxpayer cannot be used as a taxpayer basis for investigation, investigation and / or criminal prosecution of taxpayers.
LGBT in Legal and Criminology Aspects Sofwatin, Umi; Alfiani, Dian; Nurjanah, Nida; Mukti, Sintha Dwi
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 5 No 1 (2019): Unnes L.J. (April, 2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v5i1.31053

Abstract

The LGBT which is an acronym for Lesbian, Gay, Bissexual and Transgender is a group consisting of people who have sexual orientation deviations, behavioral deviations and appearances that are not in accordance with their gender. The current LGBT phenomenon has experienced rapid development in everyday life. LGBT as a form of sexual deviation, behavioral irregularities and appearance that is not in accordance with their gender, has expanded to a society with a normal social order, even these LGBT actors are not only teenagers and adults but also children. Most LGBT people present themselves as heterosexual people, this is done so that LGBT people can get along comfortably in carrying out various social activities in the community. The deviation itself does not rule out the possibility of being in campus life and the perpetrators are students to lecturers. The proliferation of television coverage of LGBT has also expanded the movement of LGBT people to show their identity that they exist. This report will discuss the observations of LGBT communities on campus (UNNES) and how they relate to crimonology and victimology.
LGBT in Legal and Criminology Aspects Sofwatin, Umi; Alfiani, Dian; Nurjanah, Nida; Mukti, Sintha Dwi
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 5 No 1 (2019): Unnes L.J. (April, 2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v5i1.31053

Abstract

The LGBT which is an acronym for Lesbian, Gay, Bissexual and Transgender is a group consisting of people who have sexual orientation deviations, behavioral deviations and appearances that are not in accordance with their gender. The current LGBT phenomenon has experienced rapid development in everyday life. LGBT as a form of sexual deviation, behavioral irregularities and appearance that is not in accordance with their gender, has expanded to a society with a normal social order, even these LGBT actors are not only teenagers and adults but also children. Most LGBT people present themselves as heterosexual people, this is done so that LGBT people can get along comfortably in carrying out various social activities in the community. The deviation itself does not rule out the possibility of being in campus life and the perpetrators are students to lecturers. The proliferation of television coverage of LGBT has also expanded the movement of LGBT people to show their identity that they exist. This report will discuss the observations of LGBT communities on campus (UNNES) and how they relate to crimonology and victimology.
Death Penalty, Right to Life, and Various Controversies in Human Rights Saputra, Adi; Santoso, Febrian Jadug
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 5 No 1 (2019): Unnes L.J. (April, 2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v5i1.35842

Abstract

In Indonesia, the issue of capital punishment is a matter of controversy between those who are pro to the death penalty and those who are against the death penalty. Those who disagree with the death penalty assume that the inhuman death sentence is contrary to the principle of fair and civilized humanity in accordance with Pancasila, only Allah can take a person's life, if the judge is wrong in passing the sentence, what can be improved again. The pro-death penalty party considers that the death penalty deserves to be imposed on a sadistic criminal in carrying out his action because if he is not sentenced to death he will repeat his crime. The death penalty is also in accordance with the National RKUHP which is pro on capital punishment, but with certain conditions. If we observe from existing laws such as the Narcotics Act, the Corruption Law, the Terrorist Law, etc. then it can be said that the Law is pro death sentence. In the context of capital punishment, Kontras, which is concerned with the matter of upholding human rights, provides a criminological view that capital punishment does not provide a deterrent effect on the perpetrators of Extraordinary Crimes, because such actions can be motivated, not only from individual distributor factors, but also structural factors, for example community economic instability due to domestic political conditions. So, because the death penalty also conflicts with the right to life, it is fitting that the death penalty be replaced with life imprisonment.
Death Penalty, Right to Life, and Various Controversies in Human Rights Saputra, Adi; Santoso, Febrian Jadug
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 5 No 1 (2019): Unnes L.J. (April, 2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v5i1.35842

Abstract

In Indonesia, the issue of capital punishment is a matter of controversy between those who are pro to the death penalty and those who are against the death penalty. Those who disagree with the death penalty assume that the inhuman death sentence is contrary to the principle of fair and civilized humanity in accordance with Pancasila, only Allah can take a person's life, if the judge is wrong in passing the sentence, what can be improved again. The pro-death penalty party considers that the death penalty deserves to be imposed on a sadistic criminal in carrying out his action because if he is not sentenced to death he will repeat his crime. The death penalty is also in accordance with the National RKUHP which is pro on capital punishment, but with certain conditions. If we observe from existing laws such as the Narcotics Act, the Corruption Law, the Terrorist Law, etc. then it can be said that the Law is pro death sentence. In the context of capital punishment, Kontras, which is concerned with the matter of upholding human rights, provides a criminological view that capital punishment does not provide a deterrent effect on the perpetrators of Extraordinary Crimes, because such actions can be motivated, not only from individual distributor factors, but also structural factors, for example community economic instability due to domestic political conditions. So, because the death penalty also conflicts with the right to life, it is fitting that the death penalty be replaced with life imprisonment.
Children Abandoning Parents: What about Legal Sanctions? Putri, Yunanda Rahma
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 5 No 1 (2019): Unnes L.J. (April, 2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v6i1.8227

Abstract

Obligations of care to parents from adult children (alimony) is an obligation of every child that should not be overlooked. If obligations are not complete with good cause neglected elderly. Surely such neglect will result in the emergence of a sanction for the child. However, the presence of sanctions for the actions of his apathetic children has not been widely known by the community . The neglected elderly people will be accommodated by the government in unit pelayanan lanjut usia, the government should guarantee economic security. In addition to the welfare of neglected elderly there are other important things that the government should take note that the protection of the elderly from wrong actions and arbitrary. The results showed that alimony obligation towards the parents of a child in Unit Pelayanan Sosial Lanjut Usia Wening Wardoyo Kabupaten Semarang has not met considering all the necessaries of life of beneficiaries has been borne by the government. For beneficiaries who still have children who are actually capable but abandoned that get into the unit should be subject to sanctions which can be a verdict asking the child to care for and maintain it self as a civil, ostracized, ridiculed and denounced by relatives in customary law and gets the barrier great to enter the gates of heaven in Islamic law, legal protection and welfare of beneficiaries in Unit Pelayanan Lanjut Usia Sosial Wening Wardoyo Kabupaten semarang have met with both proven by the various services and facilities received by the beneficiaries.
Children Abandoning Parents: What about Legal Sanctions? Putri, Yunanda Rahma
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 5 No 1 (2019): Unnes L.J. (April, 2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v6i1.8227

Abstract

Obligations of care to parents from adult children (alimony) is an obligation of every child that should not be overlooked. If obligations are not complete with good cause neglected elderly. Surely such neglect will result in the emergence of a sanction for the child. However, the presence of sanctions for the actions of his apathetic children has not been widely known by the community . The neglected elderly people will be accommodated by the government in unit pelayanan lanjut usia, the government should guarantee economic security. In addition to the welfare of neglected elderly there are other important things that the government should take note that the protection of the elderly from wrong actions and arbitrary. The results showed that alimony obligation towards the parents of a child in Unit Pelayanan Sosial Lanjut Usia Wening Wardoyo Kabupaten Semarang has not met considering all the necessaries of life of beneficiaries has been borne by the government. For beneficiaries who still have children who are actually capable but abandoned that get into the unit should be subject to sanctions which can be a verdict asking the child to care for and maintain it self as a civil, ostracized, ridiculed and denounced by relatives in customary law and gets the barrier great to enter the gates of heaven in Islamic law, legal protection and welfare of beneficiaries in Unit Pelayanan Lanjut Usia Sosial Wening Wardoyo Kabupaten semarang have met with both proven by the various services and facilities received by the beneficiaries.
Forests for Justice: What is the Sharing of Forest Products between the Government and the Community? Rudiharto, Aris
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 5 No 1 (2019): Unnes L.J. (April, 2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v6i1.8228

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the process of forest production sharing between Perum Perhutani (state-owned forestry company) and LMDH Aman Sentosa as well as the obstacles in the process of forest production sharing between Perum Perhutani and LMDH Aman Sentosa. This research is an empirical and jurudical legal study using qualitative research method. The result of this research shows that the process of production sharing etween KPH Pati and LMDH is a continuous process of the fund sharing which comprises the following processes: (a) the process of teak logging, (b) the calculation of trees and wood production, (c) the submission of sharing proposal for the LMDHs by Asper to KKPH, (d) the KPH team calculated and revised the LMDH’s right proportion, (e) KKPH submitted the proposal to the head of the unit, (f) the unit team conducted a collective correction, (g) the process of making the official report of the sharing and the decree on the allocation of sharing distribution to KPH, (h) KPH Pati issued the decree on the allocation and sharing to the LMDH, (i) KPH Pati passed in the sharing fund to the LMDH, and (j) sharing fund distribution to the members, cash board, and village officials. The obstacles faced in the process of production sharing between Perum Perhutani and LMDH Aman Sentosa are (a) complicated regulation in calculating the production sharing; (b) too long term of the production sharing fund delivery, and (c) LMDH’s delay in submitting the report.
Forests for Justice: What is the Sharing of Forest Products between the Government and the Community? Rudiharto, Aris
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 5 No 1 (2019): Unnes L.J. (April, 2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v6i1.8228

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the process of forest production sharing between Perum Perhutani (state-owned forestry company) and LMDH Aman Sentosa as well as the obstacles in the process of forest production sharing between Perum Perhutani and LMDH Aman Sentosa. This research is an empirical and jurudical legal study using qualitative research method. The result of this research shows that the process of production sharing etween KPH Pati and LMDH is a continuous process of the fund sharing which comprises the following processes: (a) the process of teak logging, (b) the calculation of trees and wood production, (c) the submission of sharing proposal for the LMDHs by Asper to KKPH, (d) the KPH team calculated and revised the LMDH’s right proportion, (e) KKPH submitted the proposal to the head of the unit, (f) the unit team conducted a collective correction, (g) the process of making the official report of the sharing and the decree on the allocation of sharing distribution to KPH, (h) KPH Pati issued the decree on the allocation and sharing to the LMDH, (i) KPH Pati passed in the sharing fund to the LMDH, and (j) sharing fund distribution to the members, cash board, and village officials. The obstacles faced in the process of production sharing between Perum Perhutani and LMDH Aman Sentosa are (a) complicated regulation in calculating the production sharing; (b) too long term of the production sharing fund delivery, and (c) LMDH’s delay in submitting the report.

Page 1 of 2 | Total Record : 12