cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Muhamad Abas
Contact Email
jurnaljustisi.fh@ubpkarawang.ac.id
Phone
+6285318977135
Journal Mail Official
jurnaljustisi.fh@ubpkarawang.ac.id
Editorial Address
Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang Jalan Ronggo Waluyo Sirnabaya, Puseurjaya, Kec. Telukjambe Timur, Kabupaten Karawang, Jawa Barat 41361
Location
Kab. karawang,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Justisi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Published by Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang
ISSN : 25282638     EISSN : 25805460     DOI : https://doi.org/10.36805/jjih
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
JUSTISI Jurnal Ilmu Hukum adalah jurnal akademik yang diterbitkan oleh Program Studi Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang. JUSTISI Jurnal Ilmu Hukum pertama kali diterbitkan pada bulan september 2016, yang telah memuat artikel-artikel pendidikan khususnya ilmu hukum dan akan mewadahi serta memfasilitasi hasil penelitian dosen dan mahasiswa dalam pengembangan keilmuan hukum. JUSTISI Jurnal Ilmu Hukum terbit 2 kali dalam 1 tahun di bulan September dan Maret pada setiap volumenya.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 8 No 2 (2023): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum" : 6 Documents clear
JURIDICAL REVIEW OF POLYGAMY PERFORMED BY CIVIL SERVANTS VIEWED FROM GOVERNMENT REGULATION NUMBER 45 OF 1990 (STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 325/PDT.G/2019/PA.PWL) Windi Destriyanti; Muhamad Gary Gagarin Akbar; Zarisnov Arafat
Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 8 No 2 (2023): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36805/jjih.v8i2.5773

Abstract

Polygamy for civil servants is contained in Government Regulation Number 45 of 1990 amendment to Government Regulation Number 10 of 1983 concerning marriage and divorce permits for civil servants. The problems raised in this study are how to regulate polygamy carried out by civil servants based on Government Regulation Number 45 of 1990 concerning marriage and divorce permits for civil servants and how judges consider them in granting case requests number 325/Pdt.G/2019/PA. Pwl. The purpose of this study is to find out the polygamy arrangements carried out by civil servants based on Government Regulation Number 45 of 1990 concerning marriage and divorce permits for civil servants and judges' considerations in granting case requests number 325/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Pwl. This research is a type of qualitative research that uses a normative juridical approach, namely a research approach by researching and studying research objects through library research. As for the author's hypothesis that polygamy practiced by civil servants must be in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations, namely Government Regulation number 45 of 1990 concerning marriage and divorce permits for civil servants/ASN. As formulated in Article 4.
LEGAL PROTECTION OF CHILDREN AFTER DIVORCE DIVORCE RELATED TO ACT NUMBER 16 OF 2019 AMENDMENT TO ACT NUMBER 1 OF 1974 CONCERNING MARRIAGE (Decision Study Number 1145/pdt.g/2020/PA.Krw) Jihan Alfadia; Muhamad Abas; Zarisnov Arafat
Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 8 No 2 (2023): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36805/jjih.v8i2.5774

Abstract

Child protection is all activities to ensure and protect children and their rights so that they can live, grow, develop and participate optimally in accordance with human dignity and values, and receive protection from violence and discrimination. Divorce so far often creates problems inherent in children's rights, namely the right to education, health, maintenance costs and so on. In Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, it mentions the rights and obligations between parents and children. It is stated in Law Number 1 of 1974 Article 45 Paragraph 1 namely: "Both parents are obliged to look after and educate their children as well as possible, while Paragraph 2 states that: The obligations of the parents referred to in Paragraph I apply until the child marries or can stand-alone. Which obligations continue even though the marriage between the two is broked, the obligation to provide maintenance for their child is not broken and the child still gets his rights as a child. The purpose of this research is to find out the legal protection of children after divorce and to find out the considerations of judges in deciding about legal protection of children after divorce.
CURRENT CONDITIONS FOR THE PROVIDENT OF CIVIL MEASURES CONTRA DROGS CONTRACTING CLASS I PARTIELLE ON THE BASIS OF LEGISLATION No. 35 OF 2009 ON DRUGS (Study of Judgment No. 446/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Gpr) Jasa Sudjana; Deny Guntara; Yuniar Rahmatiar
Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 8 No 2 (2023): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36805/jjih.v8i2.5775

Abstract

Narcotics abuse is an act of crime, the problem of narcotics abuse has a very negative and detrimental impact both in terms of law, health, economics, politics, and socio-cultural life. Narcotics abuse has been regulated in Article 127 of Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. As for the identification of the problem in this research study regarding the imposition of punishment against the perpetrators of the crime of class I drug abuse for themselves according to Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics and what are the considerations of the panel of judges in deciding a case against the perpetrators of the crime of class I drug abuse for themselves himself in decision no 446/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Gpr. In this study the aims were to find out the sentence imposed on the perpetrators of the crime of class 1 narcotics abuse for themselves according to Law No. 35 of 2009 and to find out the considerations of the panel of judges in deciding a case against the perpetrators of the crime of class I narcotics abuse for themselves in the decision number 446/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Gpr. The research method used in this study is a normative juridical research method using secondary data as the main data. The results of this study are based on Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics that perpetrators of class I drug abuse for themselves should receive medical and social rehabilitation, and the Decision of the Kediri District Court Number 446/Pid.Sus/2020PN.Gpr according to researchers there was a mistake and not in accordance with Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics.
LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF DELAY REPORTING OF SHARE ACQUISITION BETWEEN PT. AGRO PRATAMA AND PT. DHARMA SATYA NUSANTARA BASED ON LAW NUMBER 5 OF 1999 CONCERNING PROHIBITION OF MONOPOLY PRACTICES AND UNFAIR BUSINESS COMPETITION (KPPU Case Study Number 29/KPPU-M Annisa Putri azra; Anwar Hidayat; Yuniar Rahmatiar
Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 8 No 2 (2023): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36805/jjih.v8i2.5776

Abstract

The acquisition of a company is a legal act carried out by a legal entity or an individual to take over the shares of a company by purchasing a portion or the entire wealth of the company. The problem identified in this research is why reporting of company share acquisitions to the Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition (KPPU) is only related to acquisitions that have material value and what are the legal consequences of the delay in acquiring company shares in Case Number 29/KPPU-M/2019. The purpose of this research is to understand the reasons why reporting of company share acquisitions to the KPPU is only related to acquisitions that have material value and to determine the legal consequences of the delay in acquiring company shares in Case Number 29/KPPU-M/2019. This research uses a normative juridical approach. The data collection technique used in this research is literature study using primary legal materials and secondary legal materials as data sources. In conclusion, the rules regarding non-material reporting are not explicitly stated in KPPU Regulation Number 1 of 2009 concerning Pre-Notification, Mergers, Consolidations, Acquisitions, and Takeovers. As for the alleged delay in reporting in the acquisition of the company, PT. Dharma Satya Nusantara is required to pay an administrative fine as a consequence of the delayed reporting, as stipulated in Article 29(1) of Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition.
OPTIMALIZATION OF THE ROLE AND FUNCTIONS OF THE LOCAL PROPERTY BOARD IN THE SUPERVISION OF THE USE OF LIMITED LANDS IN THE CABITATES OF THE NATIONS RELATED TO THE LAW NUMBER 17 OF 2014 (Case Study at the People's Representative Council of Karawang Distri Norma Indah Nur Fitrianingsih; Muhamad Gary Gagarin Akbar; Sartika Dewi
Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 8 No 2 (2023): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36805/jjih.v8i2.5777

Abstract

Law Number 9 of 2015 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government is used as one of the formal sources in Indonesia. So that every government activity carried out must be in accordance with these regulations. The phenomenon that occurs in Karawang Regency is that there is still a lack of supervision carried out by the Karawang DPRD so this research wants to discuss the role and function of DPRD supervision in supervising the regional budget and what obstacles are experienced in carrying out this supervision. The purpose of this study is to find out what kind of supervision is carried out by the DPRD of Karawang Regency in supervising the regional budget. This research is a type of qualitative research that uses a normative juridical approach, namely by going through library materials and the results of direct interviews in the field. The results of his research are that the Karawang DPRD has not been optimal in overseeing the use of the budget, this can be proven from the findings of the BPK which continues to increase every year and the obstacles experienced by the DPRD, namely technical constraints.
JURIDICAL REVIEW OF UNILATERAL ENGAGEMENT ANNULMENT AS AN UNLAWFUN ACT IN CONNECTION WITH CODE OF CIVIL LAW (CASE STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 45/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Sng) Yustya Laraswati; Yuniar Rahmatiar; Muhamad Abas
Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 8 No 2 (2023): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36805/jjih.v8i2.5780

Abstract

According to Al-Hamdani, engagement is a man's request for another person's daughter or a woman who is under someone's guardianship, as an introduction before marriage. Engagement as a planned action is undeniable that it can be canceled for that action. The problems raised in this study are how the unlawful act in canceling a unilateral engagement according to the Civil Code and how the judge's considerations in lawsuit No. 45/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Sng. The purpose of this study is to find out how the cancellation of the engagement is said to be an unlawful act and to see the judge's considerations in granting the lawsuit Number: 45/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Sng. The research method used is a qualitative research method. Using a normative juridical approach and using data analysis methods, legal reasoning is problematic. The results of this study show that, in the decision of case No.45/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Sng, the judge considered that: unilateral cancellation of engagement categorized as unlawful acts is correct, in accordance with Article 1365 of the Civil Code. The Defendant unilaterally cancelled the engagement with the Plaintiff which has violated the norms of decency and decency in society.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 8 No 2 (2023): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 8 No 1 (2023): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 7 No 2 (2022): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 7 No 1 (2022): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 6 No 2 (2021): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 6 No 1 (2021): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 5 No 1 (2020): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 4 No 1 (2019): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 3 No 1 (2018): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 2 No 1 (2017): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 1 No 1 (2016): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum More Issue