cover
Contact Name
Rahmat Dwi Putranto
Contact Email
rdp@iblam.ac.id
Phone
+6282186310996
Journal Mail Official
Wahyu@iblam.ac.id
Editorial Address
IBLAM Kampus A Jl. Kramat Raya No. 25, Senen Jakarta Pusat Tel / fax : (021) 21392851
Location
Kota depok,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
IBLAM Law Review
ISSN : 22754146     EISSN : 27753174     DOI : 10.52249
Core Subject : Social,
Welcome to the official website of IBLAM Law Review. With the spirit of further proliferation of knowledge on the legal system in Indonesia to the wider communities, this website provides journal articles for free download. Our academic journal is a source of reference both from law academics and legal practitioner . IBLAM Law Review is a double-blind review academic journal for Legal Studies published by Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (LPPM) IBLAM School Of Law. IBLAM Law Review contains several researches and reviews on selected disciplines within several branches of Legal Studies (Sociology of Law, History of Law, Comparative Law, etc.). In addition, IBLAM Law Review also covers multiple studies on law in a broader sense. This journal is periodically published (in January, May, and September), and the approved and ready-to-publish manuscripts will also be regularly published in the website (with early view) and the hardcopy version will be circulated at the end of every period.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 13 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): IBLAM LAW REVIEW" : 13 Documents clear
DIMENSI MORALITAS TERHADAP HUKUM Renaldi Faturachman; Dava Muhammad Rizki; Salman Al Faridzi
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v2i3.73

Abstract

The law cannot stand alone without morality so that the law created is able to provide order and comfort so that the law is far from arbitrary. Morality can be equated with order and has human objects of action which are ordered to each other and for certain purposes. The idea of ​​value (good or bad) is at the core of every moral system since the concept of value is the main concept in our order of practical concepts, i.e. the highest in its genus. There is a reciprocal influence between law and morals in various aspects of human life, there is a moral contribution to law and a legal contribution to morals. The morality of a society also affects legal products, while the law affects the good and bad views of that society. Laws bind everyone as citizens, but morality treats people only as individuals. One of the legal paradigms is value so that law can be seen as a value figure as well. Law as the embodiment of values ​​implies that its presence is to protect and promote values ​​that are upheld by society. In the sociology of law, such conflicts are explained by the interaction between certain values ​​and the social structure in which those values ​​are carried out. The purpose of this study is to answer questions that have not been answered by previous researchers. The research method in this study uses a normative juridical research method in which the search for data uses a literature review.
LEGAL PROTECTION FOR VICTIMS OF BLOOD RAPE THAT PERFORM ABORTION Nofita Nurul Hidayatulloh; Muridah Isnawati
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v2i3.83

Abstract

Inbreeding rape is rape committed by someone who is related by blood, such as father to child, uncle to nephew etc. Incest rape does not rule out the possibility of pregnancy in children and physical and psychological unpreparedness makes a child choose the path of abortion. So it is worth asking about the legality of abortion as referred to in Article 75 Paragraph 2 of Law Number 36 Year 2009 concerning Health if the one who performs the abortion is a child who is a victim of incest rape. Researchers use normative methods. The results of the study show that victims of incest rape who have abortions need a form of protection from the judge as a right that has been stated in the Child Protection Act, not as perpetrators of abortion. Pregnancy due to rape can cause psychological trauma for rape victims, therefore the law prohibits abortion unless there are signs of health problems that threaten the mother and/or fetus, as well as pregnancy due to rape, which can endanger the rape victim. Due to the disgrace and bad reputation of the family, children who have abortions (abortus provakatus) can be born with defects, although not all of them, women have the right to legal protection for their reproductive functions.
LEGAL PROTECTION AGAINST STUDENTS VICTIMS OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES Linda Meilani; Djuwiah Putri Putri; Moch Rusmansyah
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v2i3.89

Abstract

This journal is entitled Protection of Santriwati Victims of the Crime of Obscenity (Case Study: Herry Wirawan) The background behind the writing of this journal is that there is a pesantren leader who is in the wildlife foundation complex, Cibiru sub-district, Bandung City who commits sexual abuse against his female students who are still as a child, where this santriwati (child) must be given a protection both physically and emotionally for the child, as regulated in Law no. 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection. The purpose of writing this journal is to find out how the legal protection for female students who are victims of criminal acts of abuse and legal remedies for the protection of female students as victims of criminal acts of obscenity is.
ANALISIS YURIDIS PENYITAAN OBJEK HAK TANGGUNGAN TERHADAP OBJEK TANAH YANG DIDASARKAN PERJANJIAN JAMINAN FIDUSIA (Studi Kasus Putusan Peninjauan Kembali Mahkamah Agung Nomor 642 PK/Pdt/2015) Ficky Khasanati
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v2i3.90

Abstract

Dalam Hukum Jaminan, diketahui terdapat pembagian mengenai perikatan yang diatur mengenai benda bergerak melalui jaminan fidusia sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Fidusia, dan benda tak bergerak melalui perjanjian hak tanggungan melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan. Dalam praktiknya diketahui seringkali terjadi pencampuran objek dalam perjanjian fidusia, maupun hak tanggungan dimana fenomena yang ada dapat dilihat dalam perkara Putusan Peninjauan Kembali Mahkamah Agung Nomor 642 PK/Pdt/2015. Dalam perkara ini PT Bank Negara Indonesia (PERSERO) Tbk., menjaminkan sertifikat atas tanah yang berjumlah 9 buah Sertifikat Hak Milik dengan Perjanjian Fidusia Nomor 2006.001.FID, dimana hal tersebut bertentangan dengan Pasal 1 Angka 4 Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Fidusia. Pada penelitian ini permasalahan yang akan dibahas adalah mengenai Penyelesaian hukum penyitaan atas tanah yang dilakukan atas dasar perjanjian Fidusia dan akibat hukum Bila suatu obyek penyitaan atas tanah yang di lakukan atas dasar perjanjian Fidusia. Dalam penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis-normatif. Metode penelitian yuridis normatif merupakan suatu penelitian kepustakaan terhadap data sekunder. Kesimpulan penelitian ini adalah apabila terdapat suatu perjanjian dalam akta fidusia yang menetapkan bahwa tanah dalam kategori hak yang di bebankan hak tanggungan, semisalnya tanah yang berlandaskan Sertifikat Hak Milik, tentunya perjanjian fidusia tersebut harus dinyatakan batal demi hukum, apabila digugat ke pengadilan. Hal ini didasarkan penulis berdasarkan ketentuan yang terdapat pada Pasal 1 Angka 4 Juncto Pasal 3 Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia.
PERTANGGUNGAN JAWABAN DALAM PERBUATAN EIGENRICHTING (Studi kasus Putusan Nomor: 263/Pid.B/2019/PN. Bgr dan Putusan Nomor 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN Kpn) Ginah Zulfa Atika; Nur Azizah Hidayat
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v2i3.91

Abstract

This study focuses on the Eigenrichting case because Eigenrichting is a case that often occurs in Indonesia, in this study discusses the different motives of crime in the Eigenrichting case contained in the Bogor court decision and the Kepanjen court decision as well as a comparison of criminal sanctions in the Eigenrichting case in the Bogor court decision and the court decision Kepanjen. This research is a normative legal research, using a case study approach. The results of this study indicate that Eigenrrichting's actions in the Bogor Court Decision Number: 263/Pid.B/2019/PN.Bgr there is an element of intent by the defendant to the victim as a result of revenge. Meanwhile, in the Kepanjen Court Decision Number 1/Pid.Sus-Child/2020/PN.Kpn there is an element of intent but in terms of protecting himself. Sanctions in the Bogor court's decision are in the form of 9 years in prison, while in the Kepanjen Court's decision the judge sentenced the defendant to a criminal coaching in the institution for 1 year.
TANTANGAN DAN HAMBATAN PENERAPAN KEADILAN RESTORATIF PADA SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA DI INDONESIA Kurniawan Tri Wibowo; Wahyu Hadingrat
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v2i3.95

Abstract

Media sosial kini menjadi faktor penting  dalam penyebaran radikalisme di Indonesia, hal ini didukung oleh pemakaian internet yang menunjukkan tren peningkatan di Indonesia. Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk mengkaji pengaturan penyebaran radikalisme dalam hukum pidana Indonesia, menganalisis kebijakan penanggulangan radikalisme yang dilakukan melalui media sosial di Indonesia. Selain itu juga membangun konsep kebijakan kriminal penanggulangan penyebaran radikalisme melalui media sosial di Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa, pengaturan penyebaran radikalisme yang dilakukan melalui media sosial belum diatur secara komprehensif dalam hukum positif Indonesia. Upaya penanggulangan radikalisme yang dilakukan melalui media sosial di Indonesia  saat ini difokuskan pada penegakan hukum represif. Konsep kebijakan kriminal penanggulangan penyebaran radikalisme yang dilakukan melalui media sosial di Indonesia dilakukan melalui tiga poin penanggulangan radikalisme melalui media sosial yaitu pengawasan, penindakan dan kerjasama platform dan masyarakat. Penindakan yang dilakukan tentunya bukan hanya sebatas take down conten di media sosial namun juga assasment untuk menentukan tingkat radikalisasi dari pelaku.
ANALISIS TERHADAP HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL ATAS PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA SEPIHAK (Studi Putusan No. 248/pdt.sus-PHI/2019/PN.MDN) Muhammad Rizqi
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v2i3.96

Abstract

The case of termination of employment is not a difficult case to find. One of the cases of Termination of Employment that occurred was the case of the Industrial Relations Dispute in the Medan District Court between the insurance company PT. Kresna Life Insurance against William Winata as the supervisory position holder, with decision number 248/Pdt.Sus- PHI/2019/PN. Mdn. On July 22, 2017 William Winata sent a letter addressed to PT. Kresna Life Insurance regarding the review of the contents of the mutation warrant which at the core of the application is willing to be transferred by asking for a mutation fee but does not receive a response and the Defendant's bipartite request is also ignored so that the bipartite is considered a failure, the mutation made by the Defendant is a fraudulent mutation that very forced to avoid obligations and responsibilities for employee rights due to changes in the Agency System. The purpose of this study is to find out the legal rules in Indonesia regarding unilateral termination of employment by the company, to determine the inhibiting factors for the implementation of the IRC decision, and to determine the legal analysis of the termination of employment by the company in the decision number 248/pdt.sus-PHI/ 2019/pn.mdn.The research conducted is normative legal research with a sociological juridical approach (empirical) which is taken from secondary data by processing data from primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials.Based on the research, it is understood that Decision Number 248/Pdt.Sus- PHI/2019/Pn.Mdn is a decision whose lawsuit value is below Rp.150,000,000 so that all charges for the case are borne by the government. The inhibiting factors for the implementation of the decision are generally due to the limited budget from the government to finance the execution and the uncertainty of the time period when the execution costs will be disbursed. In the decision of the Industrial Relations Court in the case of Termination of Employment (PHK) which orders employers to pay for the rights of workers who are laid off, such a decision can be executed or implemented because it is condemnatoir or punishment. There is a possibility that the entrepreneur will not implement the decision to pay for the rights of the worker/laborer. If theentrepreneur does not implement such a decision, the entrepreneur has committed an unlawful act.Keywords: Industrial Relations, Layoffs, Insurance Companies
KEDUDUKAN HUKUM PIMPINAN KANTOR CABANG DALAM MEWAKILI PERSEROAN TERBATAS DI DALAM PENGADILAN DIKAITKAN DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 40 TAHUN 2007 TENTANG PERSEROAN TERBATAS Rifardi Raihan Dafa; Isis Ikhwansyah Ikhwansyah; Deviana Yuanitasari
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v2i3.97

Abstract

Perseroan Terbatas di Indonesia seiring dengan berkembangnya bisnis, perlu mendirikan kantor cabang demi perluasan daya jangkau dan peningkatan kuantitas serta kualitas dari kegiatan usahanya. Tidak jarang Perseroan Terbatas memasuki ranah pengadilan oleh karena adanya perbuatan hukum, tetapi pada penerapan hukumnya, seringkali pimpinan kantor cabang menjadi pihak dalam sebuah perkara, padahal kantor cabang tidak memiliki legal standing sebagai subyek hukum. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kedudukan pimpinan kantor cabang suatu Perseroan Terbatas untuk mewakili Perseroan Terbatas dan legalitas pimpinan kantor cabang suatu Perseroan Terbatas untuk mewakili Perseroan Terbatas pada perkara perdata di dalam pengadilan. Metode penelitian yang dilakukan adalah yuridis normatif melalui tahap penelitian kepustakaan dan penelitian lapangan. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, kedudukan hukum pimpinan kantor cabang tidak dapat melakukan perbuatan hukum secara sah tanpa adanya kuasa cabang. PT dapat tidak bertanggung jawab kepada kesalahan atau kelalaian yang dilakukan oleh pimpinan kantor cabang sepanjang dapat dibuktikan tindakan yang diperbuat melampaui kuasa yang diberikan dan legalitas pimpinan kantor cabang PT sebagai pihak pada perkara perdata di pengadilan yang didasari pada kaidah hukum yang terkandung dalam Yurisprudensi tetap yang menyatakan bahwa pimpinan kantor cabang dapat ditarik sebagai pihak dalam perkara perdata adalah kurang tepat, karena kantor cabang bukan merupakan subyek hukum, maka yang dapat menggugat atau digugat adalah kantor pusatnya.
KASUS NENEK MINAH DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF TEORI HUKUM POSITIVISME Fikrotul Jadidah
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v2i3.98

Abstract

Nenek Minah (55/petani), mengambil 3 biji buah kakao milik PT Rumpun Sari Antan (RSA), ketika sedang memanen kedelai di lahan garapannya. Perbuatan nenek Minah telah diketahui oleh Mandor perkebunan, dan pada saat itu juga nenek Minah telah mengembalikan biji kakao yang diambilnya dan meminta maaf. Namun pihak perusahaan tetap melaporkan kepada Polisi. Akhirnya dalam berkas perkara Nomor No. 247/PID.B/2009/PN.Pwt, nenek Minah harus menjalani persidangan di Pengadilan Negeri (PN) Purwokerto. Adanya perbenturan antara nilai-nilai keadilan pada kasus tersebut. Pertanyaan penelitian dalam kasus ini yaitu bagaimana hukum memandang kasus tersebut dalam perspektif kepastian hukum atau positivisme hukum dan prinsip kemanusiaan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan spesifikasi penelitian deskriptif analitis. Dari hasil penelitian ini diperoleh kesimpulan yaitu Kasus hukum yang menjerat Nenek Minah ditelaah dengan menggunakan Paradigma Positivisme, ontologinya adalah sebuah realitas (hukum). Hukum yang dipaparkan adalah Pasal 362 KUHP. Hakim melakukannya dengan menghadirkan saksi-saksi dan adanya alat bukti yang dicocokkan dengan keterangan Nenek Minah sebagai terdakwa. Ketika semua unsur Pasal 362 terpenuhi, maka Nenek Minah diputus bersalah dan harus dihukum. Singkatnya, Paradigma Positivisme selalu menekankan objektivitas. Paradigma Positivisme yang memayungi aliran Legal Positivisme, menjelaskan tidak ada hukum di luar undang-undang, hukum identik dengan Undang-Undang. Bagaimana pun hukum harus ditegakkan yang keadilannya adalah keadilan menurut Undang-Undang. Hukum harus dipisahkan dari nilai kemanusiaan dan moral demi kepastian hukum. Itulah sebabnya Nenek Minah tetap harus dihukum terlepas dari seberapa besar kerugian yang diderita PT Rumpun Sari Antan, karena terbukti secara sah melakukan pencurian sebagaimana dirumuskan dalam Pasal 362 KUHP. Kata Kunci: Nenek Minah, Teori Hukum, Positivisme, Keadilan
JURIDICAL REVIEW OF LAW NUMBER 12 OF 2022 CONCERNING CRIMINAL ACTS OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE IN ACCESSIBILITY OF JUSTICE FOR WOMEN I Kadek Apdila Wirawan; Pita Permatasari
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v2i3.107

Abstract

This study aims to find out the substance of the breakthrough from the existence of Law Number 12 of 2022 concerning Crimes of Sexual Violence (“Law Number 12 of 2022”) and the accommodation of the Supreme Court Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3 of 2017 concerning Guidelines for Trialing Cases of Women Confronting the Law (“Supreme Court Regulation Number 3 of 2017”) related to the accessibility of justice for women as victims of criminal acts of violence sexual. The formulation of the problem taken is Law Number 12 of 2022 in obtaining accessibility to justice for women as victims and how can the Supreme Court Regulation Number 3 of 2017 concerning Guidelines for Trialing Cases of Women Confronting the Law accommodate women to gain accessibility justice in crimes of sexual violence. The results of this study are that in substance the protection of victims of sexual violence encourages material and formal changes in the formation of Law Number 12 of 2022. The change in the formal aspect is the development of criminal procedural law in the law on criminal acts of sexual violence, especially in terms of evidence. The development of evidence from witnesses such as the exception to the principle of unus testis nullus testis in Law Number 12 of 2022, the strength of evidence for the defendant's family as a witness. Matters that must be considered by judges in order to try and ensure that women dealing with the law obtain justice in crimes of sexual violence based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 3 of 2017, namely: (a) losses suffered by victims and compensation/restitution; (b) whether there is a power relation and the condition of the victim's powerlessness; (c) the impact of the case physically, psychologically, socially, economically; (d) there is a cycle of sexual violence, a history of sexual violence from the perpetrator to the victim; (e) the condition of women victims/witnesses; (f) Women's experiences related to sexual violence; (g) potential dangers that threaten the lives of women victims; (h) the need for recovery; and (i) results of post mortem et repertum and post mortem et repertum psychiatricum.

Page 1 of 2 | Total Record : 13