cover
Contact Name
Yulia
Contact Email
yulia@unimal.ac.id
Phone
+6281321565468
Journal Mail Official
yulia@unimal.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jalan Jawa, Kampus Bukit Indah, Universitas Malikussaleh, Blang Pulo, Muara Satu, Lhokseumawe
Location
Kota lhokseumawe,
Aceh
INDONESIA
Suloh : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh
ISSN : 16937074     EISSN : 27155455     DOI : https://doi.org/10.29103/sjp.v9i2.4799
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Suloh: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh adalah jurnal ilmiah peer-review bidang Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal ini diterbitkan oleh Program Pasca Sarjana Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Malikussaleh, Lhokseumawe, Aceh, Indonesia. Jurnal ini adalah media untuk menyebarkan informasi tentang hasil pemikiran dan penelitian dari dosen, peneliti, dan praktisi yang tertarik pada bidang Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal ini pernah terbit dalam bentuk offline (versi cetak) hingga Volume 6 dan mulai dari Volume 7 edisi 1 akan terbit secara online 2 kali dalam setahun pada bulan April dan Oktober. Scope: Hukum Pidana, Hukum Tata Negara, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Hukum Perdata
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 9, No 1 (2021): Suloh:Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, April 2021" : 5 Documents clear
PERAN DAN FUNGSI MAHKAMAH SYAR’IYAH TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN HAK PEREMPUAN DALAM PERCERAIAN Dian Eriani; Teuku Nazaruddin; Yusrizal Yusrizal
Suloh:Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh Vol 9, No 1 (2021): Suloh:Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, April 2021
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29103/sjp.v9i1.4800

Abstract

The authority of the Syar'iyah Court in the field of marriage has a lot of contact with the interests of women. The decisions made from these cases are expected to be able to fulfill women's rights in return for the perceived suffering. Has the Syar'iyah Court already played a role and function in its decisions and consideration has been gender responsiveness to protect women's rights. Specifically the rights of women arising from divorce, in the verdict and the rights of civil servants' wives due to divorce divorce. This study aims to determine the role of the Syar'iyah Court in protecting the rights of women in divorce through its decision. The method used is juridical normative with the conceptual approach and the statute approach. Data analysis uses a qualitative approach. After conducting research, the existence of legal innovations in the Syar'iyah Court and guided by Perma Number 3 of 2017 in protecting women's rights can be protected. The Syar'iyah Court has not yet fully given a concrete decision regarding women's rights as a result of divorced divorce by male civil servants. Judges' considerations are gender biased and have a patriarchal mindset, difficulty of execution due to the absence of structural relationship between the court and related institutions to be the reason for the judges to ignore Government Regulation Number 10 of 1983 as amended by Government Regulation Number 45 of 1990 concerning marriage licenses and divorce of civil servants civil. If the regulation has been ratified even though there is no structural relationship and order, the Judge is obliged to carry it out and that the Syar'iyah Court Judge in giving consideration must synergize between the divorce permit in filing the divorce request to court with the decision for civil servants
IMPLEMENTASI PERATURAN GUBERNUR ACEH NOMOR 5 TAHUN 2018 DI KABUPATEN ACEH TIMUR Fajar Adi Putra
Suloh:Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh Vol 9, No 1 (2021): Suloh:Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, April 2021
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29103/sjp.v9i1.4801

Abstract

Aceh is a province in Indonesia that applies Islamic law in law enforcement, not infrequently in law enforcement in East Aceh District by prosecutors experiencing obstacles in applying Aceh Governor Regulation No. 5 of 2018 for the perpetrators of Jarimah, so that the implementation up to now the Prosecutor is guided by the Aceh Qanun Number 7 of 2013 concerning Jinayat Procedural Law. This study aims to find out how the implementation of the Aceh Governor's Regulation No. 5 of 2018 by the Prosecutors in East Aceh District and why the implementation of the Aceh Governor's Regulation is experiencing obstacles. This study uses an empirical juridical approach to the research location in Lapi Class II B Idi, as well as using secondary data and primary data, then collecting data from literature, interviews and observations, and from the results of these data the data are arranged in a descriptive analysis. The conclusion of this study is that Aceh's Governor Regulation Number 5 Year 2018 cannot be implemented in Idi Class II B Prison, so that in carrying out the Prosecutor's whip uqubat based on Article 262 Aceh Qanun Number 7 of 2013, this is due to obstacles encountered by the Prosecutor in implement the Governor Regulation Number 5 of 2018, including the absence of facilities and infrastructure in Class II B Idi prison, the absence of Technical Instructions and Implementing Guidelines related to the implementation of Governor Regulation Number 5 of 2018 from the Aceh High Prosecutor Office and Class II B Idi Prison, the budget which is limited from the local government, will cause a commotion between prisoners, and the community does not know the whip, given the spirit of the whip is to give the effect of shame on the perpetrators and provide lessons for the community.
STUDI KOMPARATIF TENTANG ASAS LEGALITAS BERDASARKAN HUKUM PIDANA POSITIF INDONESIA DAN HUKUM PIDANA ISLAM Leni Dwi Nurmala
Suloh:Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh Vol 9, No 1 (2021): Suloh:Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, April 2021
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29103/sjp.v9i1.4802

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the legality principle according to positive criminal law in Indonesia and Islamic criminal law and to find out the comparison between the legality principle according to positive criminal law and Islamic criminal law. This type of research used in this research is using library research or known as literature research. The principle of legality in Indonesia's positive criminal law is a very fundamental principle. Because the principle of legality in criminal law is important to determine whether a criminal law regulation can be treated against a criminal act that occurs. In Islamic criminal law, the legality principle has a great influence on the judge's power, because the judge's power is very broad compared to the judge in positive law where the judge does not have sufficient power to act against the crime maker in accordance with the public interest. Comparison of the principle of legality between Islamic law and positive law. Whereas the application of the legality principle to positive criminal law and Islamic criminal law has similarities and differences. The similarity is that both apply the principle of legality in the legal process while the difference is that positive criminal law is the same in its application to offenses, whereas in Islamic criminal law there is a distinction between Jarimah qishas diyat, hudud, which is applied strongly, while in Jarimah ta'zir it is relaxed so that the benefit of society is fulfilled. In addition to having the similarities and differences above, the legality principle also has advantages and disadvantages, among others, in Islamic law the criminal provisions cannot be changed (added / reduced) because it is a provision from Allah which is standard, while in positive law the criminal provisions may change at any time. according to the times.
ANALISIS PRINSIP KEADILAN TENTANG SYARAT MENJADI ANGGOTA LEGISLATIF BAGI KEPALA DESA BERDASARKAN UNDANG – UNDANG NOMOR 7 TAHUN 2017 DAN PERATURAN KOMISI PEMILIHAN UMUM NOMOR 20 TAHUN 2018 Muhammad Sayuni; Elidar Sari; Sulaiman Sulaiman
Suloh:Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh Vol 9, No 1 (2021): Suloh:Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, April 2021
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29103/sjp.v9i1.4803

Abstract

General Election is a means of implementing people's sovereignty which is carried out directly, freely, secretly, honestly and fairly based on the Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Implementation of Elections is the implementation of the stages of elections which are carried out freely, fairly, and honestly.   The purpose of this study is to analyze the principle of justice in the requirements to become a legislative member for the Village Head based on Law Number 7 of 2017 and Election Commission Regulation Number 20 of 2018. The results of the study showed that the first election held in 2019 did not implement the principles of justice in terms of the legislative candidate for the Village Head. The public can provide legal certainty for the implementation of the 2019 Election law. It is recommended to the General Election Commission to revise the Election Commission Regulation regarding the nomination of members of the DPR, Provincial DPRD, and Regency / City DPRD specifically in the requirements for candidates for the Village Head in Article 8 paragraph 1 letter b number 6 point b, to guarantee the rights of citizens and fulfill the principles of justice.
WANPRESTASI PENJUAL TERKAIT KESALAHAN DALAM PEMBAYARAN JUAL BELI TANAH DAN RUMAH (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor : 68/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Cbn) Sri Endhayani Ginting Suka; Sunarmi Sunarmi; Hasim Purba
Suloh:Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh Vol 9, No 1 (2021): Suloh:Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, April 2021
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29103/sjp.v9i1.4804

Abstract

The case begins when someone buys a building from Defendant 1(Director of PT. Indojaya Pan Pratama). The price is paid through the company’s manager on behalf of the defendant1. The plaintiff buys the house by installment with a contract that when the price has been paid off, the certificate of the land and the building on it will be made. According to the contract, after the installment has been paid off by the plaintiff, the company has to hand in the certificate, but the fact is that it defaults. The research used juridical normative method by conducting library research while secondary data were obtained from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The result of the normative research shows that the liability of a property developer who defaults toward a buyer is that he is required to be liable for compensating for all costs, interest, and fine which have been expended on the price of land and building which have been sold to a buyer through the court. The seller can be sued due to any violation of breaching a contract as it is stipulated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5