cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
mlj@unmer.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
mlj@unmer.ac.id
Editorial Address
Postgraduate University of Merdeka Malang Building Terusan Dieng Street 62-64, Malang City, East Java, Indonesia, 65146.
Location
Kota malang,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
MLJ Merdeka Law Journal
Published by Universitas Merdeka Malang
ISSN : 27227448     EISSN : 27227456     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.26905/mlj
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Welcome to the official website of MLJ Merdeka Law Journal. With the spirit of further proliferation of knowledge on the legal in Indonesia to the wider communities, this website provides journal articles for free download. MLJ Merdeka Law Journal is a scientific publication affiliated with the Law Masters Program in the Merdeka Malang University Graduate Program, which was first published in 2020. The goal of the MLJ Merdeka Law Journal is as a forum for the exchange of ideas, studies, and results of research and scientific development in the field of law from academics and legal practitioners. The scope of the MLJ Merdeka Law Journal article is related to legal issues: constitutional law, administrative law, criminal law, civil law, international law, regulations, comparative law, and jurisprudence. Published articles have gone through a process of review and editing by the editor without changing the substance of the article. Published writing is the personal responsibility of the author and does not reflect the opinion of the publisher. More several other changes in MLJ Merdeka Law Journal are informed in the Journal History.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 44 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Korban Bullying dalam Perspektif Viktimologi Maria Cicilia Tri Palupi
MLJ Merdeka Law Journal Vol 1, No 2 (2020): November 2020 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal
Publisher : Postgraduate University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/mlj.v2i1.5494

Abstract

Bullying is still not getting enough attention. In Indonesia, victims of bullying are not recognized by the perpetrators. Victims of bullying can only be silent, resigned, and cannot fight back. Protection of victims of bullying is still very minimal. This type of research is normative juridical research. This study uses a juridical-normative research approach, a statutory approach, and a victimological juridical approach. Legal materials use primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Interpretation in research uses the historical interpretation of the provisions of law and systematic interpretation. The results showed that Victimology identified the rights of the victims. This view is very important considering that bullying itself is not considered a problem, but is considered a normal act in childhood. From this point of view, of course, the rights of victims of bullying have not been realized much, even though the impact of this behavior is very real. UU Number 31 of 2014 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims cannot be applied effectively to deal with victims and assist victims if there is a legal process that occurs because the Witness and Victim Protection Agency are only in the Central, not yet in the regions. So that the protection of witnesses and victims is only carried out by the relevant agencies and the policeAbstraksBullying masih kurang mendapat perhatian. Di Indonesia korban bullying tidak disadari oleh pelaku. Korban bullying hanya bisa diam, pasrah dan tidak bisa melawan. Perlindungan korban bullying masih sangat minim. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan penelitian yuridis-normatif, pendekatan undang-undang, dan pendekatan yuridis viktimologis. Bahan hukum menggunakan bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier. Interpretasi dalam penelitian menggunakan interpretasi historis dari ketentuan sebuah hukum dan interpretasi sistematis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan Victimology mengidentifikasi hak-hak korban. Pandangan ini sangat penting mengingat bullying itu sendiri tidak dianggap sebagai masalah, tetapi dianggap sebagai tindakan yang wajar di masa kanak-kanak. Dari sudut pandang ini, tentunya hak-hak korban bullying belum banyak direalisasikan, padahal dampak dari perilaku tersebut sangat nyata. UU Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban tidak dapat diterapkan secara efektif untuk menangani korban dan mendampingi korban apabila ada proses hukum yang terjadi karena Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban hanya ada di Pusat, belum di daerah. Sehingga perlindungan saksi dan korban hanya dilakukan oleh instansi terkait dan kepolisianDOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/mlj.v1i2.5494
Implementasi Pasal 65 Ayat 1 Undang-Undang No. 32 Tahun 2009 Terhadap Masyarakat yang Terkena Dampak Pengusahaan Pertambangan Pasir Muhammad Panji Mahardika; Dewi Astutty Mochtar; Diah Aju Wisnuwardhani
MLJ Merdeka Law Journal Vol 1, No 1 (2020): May 2020 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal
Publisher : Postgraduate University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/mlj.v1i1.4290

Abstract

This study aims to find out how the implementation of article 65 paragraph 1 of Law No.32 of 2009 and the legal protection of people affected by sand removal in Lumajang Regency. Based on the law adjusted to the experience that occurs in the community to better know and understand the law as a set of rules or positive norms that apply. That the Lumajang District community has a legal protection. But unfortunately, this regulation is not used as a reference for the government in managing the resources contained in Lumajang regency in the form of sand mining assets. In general, the existence of mining will result in losses both in the environment and for the people who live around the mining area. In this case the rights of the Lumajang district community have been violated, such as the right to a healthy life, the right to safety and comfort, and the right to prosperity.DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/mlj.v1i1.4290.
Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pencipta dan Pemegang Hak Cipta Konten Kreator Instagram Fetum Fetum
MLJ Merdeka Law Journal Vol 2, No 2 (2021): November 2021 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal
Publisher : Postgraduate University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/mlj.v2i2.7163

Abstract

The goal to be achieved through this research is to identify, assess and analyze legal protection for creators and copyright holders of Instagram creator content, Copyright Holders and Instagram Content Creators get legal protection for creations and content created based on their original thoughts or ideas and creativity. into the Instagram platform in Indonesia. The type of research used to write this thesis uses normative legal research in the preparation of this scientific paper with a descriptive method, especially related to Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright and other supporting regulations. From the results of the research using the above method, the authors get answers to the existing problems that Copyright Holders and Instagram Content Creators get legal protection for creations and content created based on their original thoughts or ideas and creativity into the Instagram platform in Indonesia. In addition, the Copyright Law provides protection related to moral rights and economic rights, moral rights and economic rights are exclusive rights owned by creators or content creators that must be protected by the Copyright Law. Criminal sanctions for copyright infringement have provided legal protection for creators and copyright holders of Instagram creator content, this is regulated in the Copyright Law, which contains 8 (eight) provisions relating to criminal sanctions for copyright infringement, namely Article 112 to Article 119 of the Copyright Act. In this case, it is clear that there is a threat of criminal sanctions for people who deliberately steal other people's content, but the lack of legal information for Instagram content creators has made it impossible for people to be convicted under these provisions.DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/mlj.v2i2.7163 
Implikasi Yuridis terhadap Calon Independen dalam Pilkada menurut Undang-Undang Tentang Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Andi Ahmad Mappasiling; Supriyadi Supriyadi
MLJ Merdeka Law Journal Vol 2, No 1 (2021): May 2021 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal
Publisher : Postgraduate University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/mlj.v2i1.6239

Abstract

This legal research is based on the focus of the problem regarding the Juridical Basis of Independent Candidates in the Regional Head General Election System (Pilkada) and the Legal Implications Faced by Independent Candidates in the Regional Head Election (Pilkada) based on the Law on Regional Head Elections. This research includes normative legal research using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The conclusion of this study, the juridical basis behind individual candidates in the Pilkada is the Constitutional Court Decision No. 5/PUU-V/2007. The success of individual candidates in participating in regional head elections cannot be separated from the role played by Lalu Ranggalawe, a member of the DPRD in Central Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara who conducted a judicial review of the Constitutional Court. The Legal Implications Faced by Independent Candidates in the Regional Head Election (Pilkada) is the frequent occurrence of difficulties that make prospective candidates from individual candidates fail, especially those of an administrative nature. In addition to the requirements for candidacy which are difficult to fulfill, namely a number of supports from voters, there is also a provision that all support must be factuated by using the census method by meeting directly with each candidate's supporters.DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/mlj.v2i1.6239
Kewengan Judisial Badan Pengawas Pemilu Dalam Perspektif Asas Nemo Judex In Causa Sua Agus Susanto
MLJ Merdeka Law Journal Vol 1, No 2 (2020): November 2020 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal
Publisher : Postgraduate University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/mlj.v2i1.5495

Abstract

Authority of Bawaslu based on Law No. 7 of 2017, apart from the election administration supervisory body, it is also authorized to resolve disputes over the election process up to the District / City Bawaslu level. Authority is exercised by the Quasi-Court method. On January 23, 2019, an Election Process Dispute Request was registered by the Kasdi to the Bawaslu City of Bontang against the Bontang City KPU on the object of the dispute over Bontang City KPU Decree Number: 58/HK.03.1-Kpt/6474 KPU-Kot/IX/ 2018. The Bontang City KPU Decree is a follow-up to the East Kalimantan Bawaslu Decision Number 002/TM/PL/ADM/Prov/23.00/XII/ 2018 regarding the removal of the Kasdi's name in the DCT DPRD Bontang City Electoral District of Bontang 1 from the Nasdem Party. This research uses normative legal methods and conceptual approaches, to understand the concept of the principle of Nemo judex in causa sua in the Bawaslu Bontang Decision Number 01/PS.Reg/23.03/I/2019. The data source is secondary data. Normatively the Bawaslu judge of Bontang City has violated the principle of nemo judex in causa sua, but every decision issued by Bawaslu is final, final and binding. The decision must be accepted and implemented as a legal product. The juridical implication for judges who violate the principle of nemo judex in causa sua is that they are subject to administrative sanctions or being punished. Abstraks Kewenangan Bawaslu Berdasarkan UU No. 7 Tahun 2017 selain badan pengawas penyelenggaraan pemilu juga berwenang untuk penyelesaian sengketa proses pemilu hingga tingkat Bawaslu Kabupaten/Kota. Kewe-nangan dilaksanakan dengan metode Quasi Pengadilan. Pada tanggal 23 Januari 2019 telah didaftarkan Permohonan Sengketa Proses Pemilu oleh Kasdi ke Bawaslu Kota Bontang terhadap KPU Kota Bontang atas objek sengketa Surat Keputusan KPU Kota Bontang Nomor: 58/HK.03.1-Kpt/ 6474/KPU-Kot/IX/2018. SK KPU Kota Bontang tersebut adalah tindak-lanjut dari Putusan Bawaslu Provinsi Kalimantan Timur Nomor 002/TM/ PL/ADM/Prov/ 23.00/XII/2018 terkait pencoretan nama Kasdi dalam DCT DPRD Kota Bontang Dapil Bontang 1 dari Partai Nasdem. Penelitian menggunakan metode hukum normatif dan pendekatan konsep, untuk memahami konsep asas nemo judex in causa sua dalam Putusan Bawaslu Bontang Nomor 01/PS.Reg/23.03/I/2019. Sumber data berupa data sekunder. Secara normatif hakim Bawaslu Kota Bontang telah melanggar asas nemo judex in causa sua, namun setiap putusan yang dikeluarkan Bawaslu bersifat akhir, final dan mengikat. Putusan tersebut harus tetap diterima dan dilaksanakan sebagai produk hukum yang sah. Implikasi yuridis terhadap hakim yang melanggar asas nemo judex in causa sua ialah dikenakan sanksi administratif atau dipidana. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/mlj.v1i2.5495. 
Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Saham Minoritas PT (Persero) dalam Pembentukan Anak Perusahaan BUMN Hamanda Tiara Emanuella
MLJ Merdeka Law Journal Vol 2, No 2 (2021): November 2021 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal
Publisher : Postgraduate University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/mlj.v2i2.7166

Abstract

BUMN (Persero) is regulated in UU 19 of 2003 on BUMN. BUMN hold 50% or more of share as a major controlled, the minority share can be owned by other parties with IPO mechanism. BUMN is including the subject of Law Number 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Company, which specifically regulates the rights of shareholders. However, the problem is related to when the BUMN carrying out its business activities establishes a subsidiary based on the decision of the GMS, where the majority shareholder who is the largest shareholder is on the side of him, which makes the rights of the minority shareholder neglected. The purpose of this study is to analyze the pattern of protection for minority shareholders of Limited Liability Company according to Corporat Law system and the legal remedies of minority shareholders in protecting their rights to action. This research is a normative legal research with descriptive analytical research. The result of this study is that legal protection for minority shareholders of BUMN is regulated in BUMN Law and Limited Liability Company Law but there are the rights of these shareholders which are only fulfilled if they receive support from the majority shareholder, so that the sense of justice of minority shareholders is not protected. , however, there are efforts to settle disputes that can be taken both litigation and non-litigation, especially Acts against the Law (1365 BW) with the mechanism regulated in the Law on Company LawDOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/mlj.v2i2.7166
Urgensi Pengaturan Pidana Tentang Ngelem yang Mengandung Zat Adiktif Menurut UndangUndang No 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika Irwan Tjatur Pambudi; Setiyono Setiyono; Indrawati Indrawati
MLJ Merdeka Law Journal Vol 1, No 1 (2020): May 2020 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal
Publisher : Postgraduate University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/mlj.v1i1.4291

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the urgency of the Criminal Regulation concerning Ngelem according to Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. The problem approach used is normative juridical supported by empirical juridical. The data used are primary. Data analysis was performed descriptively qualitatively. The results of the study showed that the application of the law against nuisance users according to Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics and Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number 44 of 2019 concerning changes in the classification of Narcotics in Indonesia cannot be processed by law enforcement officials. This is because it has not yet been regulated about addictive substances in Ngelem content. So it is necessary to make changes to the Law Number 35 the Year 2009 and the Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number 44 the Year 2019 regarding the change in the classification of Narcotics.DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/mlj.v1i1.4291.
Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis secara Elektronik melalui Lembaga Arbitrase di Indonesia Benediktus Akel Terwarat; Dewi Astuti Mochtar
MLJ Merdeka Law Journal Vol 2, No 1 (2021): May 2021 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal
Publisher : Postgraduate University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/mlj.v2i1.6253

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the process of electronically resolving business disputes through arbitration and the legal force of electronic arbitration awards. Using normative legal research that is used using the law approach and comparative law. The results show that dispute resolution can be done electronically through an arbitration institution. Electronic arbitration arrangements and procedures do not conflict with the provisions of Law No. 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution (UUAAPS). With respect to electronic arbitration awards, decisions that are valid and have legal force remain valid as long as conventional arbitral awards comply with the provisions of Article 54 paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) and have executive power as long as they comply with the provisions of Article 59 paragraph (2) of Law Number 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution (UUAAPS). Of course, to support the legal force of the Electronic Arbitration Award, Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions is needed as the legal basis for supporting the provisions of Article 4 paragraph (3) UUAAPS. The legal power of electronic arbitral awards based on the ITE Law, which is electronic which has the power of proof with other conventional documents, if at any time it is needed as evidence in related disputesPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis proses penyelesaian sengketa bisnis secara elektronik melalui lembaga arbitrase serta kekuatan hukum putusan arbitrase elektronik. Menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dipakai dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan perbandingan hukum. Hasilnya menujukan bahwa penyelesaian sengketa dapat dilakukan secara elektronik melalui lembaga arbitrase. Pengaturan dan prosedur arbitrase elektronik berlaku sepanjang tidak bertentangan dengan ketentuan Undang-Undang No 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengekta (UUAAPS). Terhadap putusan arbitrase elektronik, dianggap berlaku dan mempunyai kekuataan hukum tetap layaknya putusan arbitrase konvensional sepanjang memenuhi ketentuan Pasal 54 ayat (2) dan ayat (3)  dan mempunyai kekuatan eksekutorial sepanjang memenuhi ketentuan Pasal 59 ayat (2) Undang Undang  Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (UUAAPS). Tentu untuk mendukung kekuatan hukum Putusan Arbitrase Elektronik, maka dibutuhkan UU Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas UU Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik sebagai dasar hukum pendukung ketentuan Pasal 4 ayat (3) UUAAPS. Kekuaatan hukum putusan arbitrase elektronik berdasarkan Undang Undang ITE, yang merupakan dokumen elektronik yang mempunyai kekuatan pembuktian sama dengan dokumen konvensional lainnya, apabila sewaktu-waktu dibutuhkan sebagai alat bukti dalam penyelesaian sengketaa yang berkaitan.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Data Pribadi Konsumen dalam Transaksi e-Commerce Herdi Setiawan; Mohammad Ghufron; Dewi Astutty Mochtar
MLJ Merdeka Law Journal Vol 1, No 2 (2020): November 2020 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal
Publisher : Postgraduate University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/mlj.v2i1.5496

Abstract

This study discusses the legal protection of consumer personal data in e-commerce transactions and the regulation of consumer personal data in e-commerce transactions. The method used in this research is normative legal research with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The results show that the protection of personal data as part of privacy is a human right. This recognition is reflected in both the constitution and various regulations at the level of laws. However, no specific regulations are governing the protection of personal data at the statutory level. In Indonesia, there are no regulations on personal data in e-commerce transactions. This problem is only regulated in Article 26 of the ITE Law and several other articles. Legal protection for consumers in e-commerce transactions is needed to facilitate online consumer transactions. The goal is to enforce all transactions in the same way regardless of the medium selected. AbstraksPenelitian ini membahas tentang perlindungan hukum terhadap data pribadi konsumen dalam transaksi e-commerce dan pengaturan terhadap data pribadi konsumen dalam transaksi e-commerce. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan statute approach dan conceptual approach. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan data pribadi sebagai bagian dari privasi merupakan hak asasi manusia. Pengakuan tersebut terefleksi, baik dalam konstitusi maupun beragam peraturan selevel undang-undang. Namun demikian, peraturan yang khusus mengatur mengenai perlindungan data pribadi pada level undang-undang belum dimiliki. Di Indonesia belum mempunyai peraturan terhadap data pribadi dalam transaksi e-commerce. Masalah ini hanya diatur dalam Pasal 26 UU ITE dan beberapa pasal lainnya. Perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen dalam transaksi e-commerce dibutuhkan untuk menfasilitasi transaksi konsumen secara online. Tujuannya untuk memberlakukan semua transaksi dengan cara yang sama tanpa melihat media yang dipilih. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/mlj.v1i2.5496
Sengketa Batas Wilayah Dalam Sistem Pemerintah Daerah (Studi Pada Batas Wilayah Kabupaten Sintang Dan Kabupaten Sekadau) Ferdinan Paulus Anyab
MLJ Merdeka Law Journal Vol 2, No 2 (2021): November 2021 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal
Publisher : Postgraduate University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/mlj.v2i2.7156

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the settlement of boundary disputes that are available in the Indonesian legal system, analyze the factors that cause boundary disputes in the expansion of the Autonomous Region in Sintang Regency and Sekadau Regency. The type of research conducted is juridical-empirical. The results of the study conclude that: First, the pattern of settlement of territorial boundary disputes is generally through two channels, namely: non-legal settlement of border disputes, and legal settlement. Non-legally mediated by the Ministry of Home Affairs and the Governor. Meanwhile, legal dispute resolution is pursued through litigation. The occurrence of territorial boundary disputes is triggered by the process of regional expansion which does not require regional boundaries as a legal requirement in regional expansion. The requirements that are met are more technical, physical and political. In territorial boundary disputes with district governments, the role of the provincial government is only as a facilitator according to the level of the case dispute.DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/mlj.v2i2.7156

Page 1 of 5 | Total Record : 44

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2020 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 4, No 1 (2023): May 2023 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal Vol 3, No 2 (2022): November 2022 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal Vol 3, No 1 (2022): May 2022 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal Vol 2, No 2 (2021): November 2021 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal Vol 2, No 1 (2021): May 2021 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal Vol 1, No 2 (2020): November 2020 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal Vol 1, No 1 (2020): May 2020 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal