cover
Contact Name
Otto Fajarianto
Contact Email
ofajarianto@gmail.com
Phone
+6281296890687
Journal Mail Official
ofajarianto@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Golden Plaza (D'Best) Blok E -16 Jl. RS. Fatmawati No. 15, Jakarta Selatan 12420
Location
Kota adm. jakarta selatan,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR)
ISSN : -     EISSN : 2715498X     DOI : https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v3i3
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR) is an international, peer-reviewed journal publishing articles on all aspects of LAW, POLICY REVIEW and SOCIAL SCIENCES. Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR) welcomes submissions of the following article types: (1) Papers: reports of high-quality original research with conclusions representing a significant advance, novelty or new finding in the field; (2) Topical Reviews: written by leading researchers in their fields, these articles present the background to and overview of a particular field, and the current state of the art. Topical Reviews are normally invited by the Editorial Board; (3) Comments: comment or criticism on work previously published in the journal. These are usually published with an associated Reply. Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR) publishes three (February, June, October) issues per year, published by IPEST, International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial and Teknologi. Article must publish in English.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 83 Documents
The Exigency of Fossil Fuel Discontinuation for the Attainment of Indonesia’s Governmental Mandates in the Transition Towards Sustainable Energy Annisa Permata Sari Harahap
Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), October 2023
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v5i1.178

Abstract

This research discusses the urgency of addressing climate change, emphasizing the need to shift away from fossil fuels and transition to new and renewable energy sources. It highlights the increasing frequency of climate-related disasters and the global commitment to limiting temperature rise as outlined in the Paris Agreement. The text also mentions the challenges in Indonesia’s energy landscape, including a heavy reliance on fossil fuels and the importance of government intervention to promote renewable energy. It stresses the significance of a legal framework to support the transition to renewable energy and emphasizes the role of organizations like the Institute for Essential Services Reform (IESR) in driving this transition. Ultimately, it underscores the pressing need for decisive action to combat climate change and promote sustainable energy practices.
Equitable Law Enforcement Against Law Enforcement Officers in Criminal Acts of Corruption Andi Apriyanto; Siswantari Pratiwi; Parbuntian Sinaga
Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol 4 No 3 (2023): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), June 2023
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v4i3.179

Abstract

The pattern of eradicating corruption by punishing perpetrators with severe criminal sanctions and even up to the death penalty must be upheld to prevent acts of corruption. However, in practice, the criminal sanctions given by court judges to perpetrators are still light, even when the perpetrators are law enforcement officials such as the Prosecutor General's Office. The problem is how to consider the judges of the DKI Jakarta High Court Number 10/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PT.Dki and the Decision of the Central Jakarta District Court Number 11/Pid.B/TPK/2008/PN.Jkt.Pst in imposing criminal sanctions by Prosecutor Pinangki and Prosecutor Urip Tri Gunawan? The research method used is normative juridical research using secondary data. The results of the study stated that the consideration of the DKI Jakarta High Court Judge Number 10/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PT.Dki and the Decision of the Central Jakarta District Court Number 11/Pid.B/TPK/2008/PN.Jkt.Pst in imposing criminal sanctions that were carried out by Prosecutor Pinangki and Prosecutor Urip Tri Gunawan was based on mitigating and aggravating matters which led to disparities. This is caused by structural factors, substance factors, and cultural factors.
The Legal Force of The Deed of Wills Regarding Undivided Community Property Which was Canceled Pursuant to State Court Ruling Number 43/PDT.G/2020/PN.MDN Monica Pratiwi
Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), October 2023
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v5i1.180

Abstract

A testamentary deed is the embodiment of a person's last wishes regarding the assets he or she leaves behind. The assets left behind can be inherited and joint assets. The will deed must pay attention to applicable legal rules. In its creation, the testamentary gift deed is closely related to the party authorized to make authentic deeds, namely the Notary profession. This research discusses the legal power of wills regarding joint assets that have not been divided. The problem discussed in this research is how the judge at the Medan District Court considers declaring a Will Deed whose object is joint property that has not been divided, and what are the legal consequences of canceling a Will whose object is joint property that has not been divided. In this case, it refers to the decision of the Medan District Court Number 43/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Mdn. The research method used is normative juridical, descriptive analytical, based on secondary data, through document study searches, with a qualitative approach. From the results of this research, the first conclusion that can be drawn is that the judge's consideration of Deed of Will Number 05 did not clearly take into account the existence of a mixture of assets between the Plaintiff and (the late) Leman as joint search assets with his wife, Mrs. Tan Bie Tju, even though nothing was created between the late Leman and Tan Bie Tju. "marriage agreement", so that the Plaintiff is entitled to ½ (half) of the joint assets. The legal consequences of canceling a Deed of Will whose object is joint property that has not been divided which is canceled by a judge's decision causes the loss of the binding force of the deed on the parties. Notaries should prioritize the principle of prudence by carrying out the obligation to carefully check all documents related to formal correctness before writing them down in the form of a deed.