JME (Journal of Mathematics Education)
Menerima segala bentuk artikel dalam bidang pendidikan matematika Penelitian eksperimen, ekspost facto, penelitian korelasi, Penelitian pengembangan dan juga Systematic Literature Review.
Articles
12 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol 3, No 1 (2018): JME"
:
12 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[SELF ASSESSMENT TO KNOW UNDERSTANDING MATHEMATIC CONCEPT ]]>
<![CDATA[Deni Iriyadi]]>
<![CDATA[ JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol 3, No 1 (2018): JME ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (989.056 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31327/jme.v3i1.525
<![CDATA[This research is a qualitative study aimed to determine the students' understanding of the concept of matter limit. The subjects were students of class XI IPA 1 SMA Negeri 1 Watampone. The concept includes the definition of the limit. Data obtained using a research instrument in the form of self-assessment and then proceed with the interview subjects were selected based on the results of self-assessment has been done before. Analysis using qualitative analysis of students' understanding of the concept of the limit concept. The results of this study indicate that students' understanding of concepts some of which are not / do not understand especially regarding definitions limit. In addition students are also wrong about the resolution limit. Students who understand the concept of limit dinyakatakan them restate concepts, including examples and classify the sample to non-completion of function and limit the right results.]]>
<![CDATA[DESCRIBE REASONING OF STUDENTS IN COMPLETING THREE-DIMENSIONAL PROBLEM-SOLVING ]]>
<![CDATA[N. Nisraeni]]>;
<![CDATA[Dwi Risky Arifanti]]>
<![CDATA[ JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol 3, No 1 (2018): JME ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (916.123 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31327/jme.v3i1.526
<![CDATA[This study aims to describe reasoning by highly capable subjects (ST), medium-impacted subjects (SS), and low-ability subjects (SR) in completing three-dimensional problem-solving tasks. This research is a qualitative descriptive research. Instruments in this study are researchers as the main instrument guided by the task of solving problems Mathematics and interview guidelines are valid. The subjects of this study were students of class XI IPA C consisting of 3 people (high-ability subject (ST), medium-skilled subjects (SS), and low-ability subjects (SR)). The research process follows the steps of: (a) formulating the reasoning indicator in solving Mathematics problem, (b) formulating the supporting instrument (valid problem solving task of Mathematics and interviewing), (c) did research subject taking, (d) perform data retrieval to uncover students' reasoning in Mathematical problem solving, (e) do triangulation techniques to obtain valid data (f) perform analysis of student reasoning data in problem solving, (g) conduct discussion of result of analysis, (h) make a conclusion of research result. The results of a highly capable subject study show: 1) in understanding the problem using inductive reasoning type analogies, 2) planning completion using inductive reasoning, 3) carrying out the settlement plan using inductive and deductive reasoning, 4) re-examining using common procedures. While for the subject of moderate ability and low-ability subjects in solving problems only meet one reasoning indicator that is filed allegations (inductive type of analogy) is at the stage of understanding the problem. By looking at the students' abilities teachers need to provide non-routine questions so that students are better trained in reasoning and able to develop students' communication skills both in the learning process and in the community environment.]]>
<![CDATA[COMPARISON OF LEARNING MATH LEARNING RESULT STUDENTS WITH SAVI MODEL AND NHT MODEL ON STUDENT SMKN 1 KOLAKA ]]>
<![CDATA[S. Supratman]]>;
<![CDATA[Sri Wulandari Muhlis]]>
<![CDATA[ JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol 3, No 1 (2018): JME ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (952.39 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31327/jme.v3i1.495
<![CDATA[The formulation of the problem in this research are: (1) How the result of learning mathematics of students after taught by SAVI learning model?, (2) How the result of learning mathematics of students after taught by NHT learning model?, (3) Is the result of learning mathematics of students who taught with SAVI learning model is higher than students taught by NHT learning model. The purpose of this study are: (1) To know how the results of learning mathematics students after teaching with SAVI learning model, (2) To find out how the results of learning mathematics students after being taught with NHT learning model, (3) To determine whether the results of learning mathematics students taught by SAVI learning models higher than students taught by NHT learning models. Type of research using experimental method. The population in this study is all students of class X spread in 11 parallel classes with the number of 310 people. Sampling was done by using cluster random sampling technique. In this research as a sample taken 2 classes from the entire population that is class X A3 as experiment class 1 using SAVI learning model and class X A1 as experiment class 2 using NHT learning model. From result of data analysis obtained that: (1) result of student learning taught by using SAVI learning model which consist of 25 students show minimum value 62, maximum value 96, mean (mean) 80,36, with standard deviation 9,10; (2) student learning outcomes taught using NHT learning model consisting of 25 students showing minimum score 62, maximum value 96, mean (mean) 79,62, with standard deviation 10,512; (3) result of t-test analysis using independent sample t-test obtained tcount = 0,302 at = 0,05 with degrees of freedom (dk) = 48 obtained t table = 2,011. Because t t table then Ha is rejected and H0 is accepted. So it can be concluded that the mathematics learning outcomes of students who were taught with the SAVI model was not higher than the students taught by the NHT model.]]>
<![CDATA[THE INFLUENCE OF MACROMEDIA FLASH LEARNING ON THE STUDENTS’ MATHEMATIC CONCEPT UNDERSTANDING ]]>
<![CDATA[Hawa Liberna]]>;
<![CDATA[Diah Oga Nusantari]]>
<![CDATA[ JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol 3, No 1 (2018): JME ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (1054.024 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31327/jme.v3i1.440
<![CDATA[This study aimed to determine the effect of Macromedia flash learning on the mathematical concepts understanding. This experimental research was conducted at the SMP PGRI 20 JAKARTA in the academic year 2016/2017. The sample of the research was the students of class VII with the number of students as many as 56 students consisting of 28 students of class VII-2 as the experimental group and 28 students consisting of grade VII-3 students as the control group, with different treatment from each skill program. Research data from each group was obtained by posttest using an instrument in the form of 10 items about the form of description by fulfilling the assessment aspect for the concept comprehension ability. The instruments used in this study had been tested in advance and all items were valid and had a high degree of reliability. Data analysis of research results using t-test by first testing the assumption of normality and homogeneity. The results showed that there was a significant influence of Macromedia Flash learning on the mathematical concepts understanding, especially in triangle and quadrilateral materials in class VII SMP PGRI 20 JAKARTA.]]>
<![CDATA[THE EFFECTIVENESS OF LEARNING MODELS REALISTIC MATHEMATICS EDUCATION AND PROBLEM BASED LEARNING TOWARD MATHEMATICAL REASONING SKILLS AT STUDENTS OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL ]]>
<![CDATA[Gemi Susanti]]>;
<![CDATA[Ahmad Rustam]]>
<![CDATA[ JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol 3, No 1 (2018): JME ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (955.946 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31327/jme.v3i1.534
<![CDATA[This research aims to analyze the difference effectiveness of learning model Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) and model learning problem based learning (PBL) to students' mathematical reasoning skills. The design of this research is quasi experiment with pretest-posttest control group design. The population of this study is the students of grade VIII SMPN 1 Watubangga 2015/2016 year that studying about building a flat side space. The data of mathematical reasoning skills is obtained by using the instrument in the form of mathematical reasoning test. Data analysis technique used is descriptive statistical analysis, F test with t test (paired-samples t test and independent-samples t test), at α = 0,05 . Based on the result of analysis of research data obtained that: 1). Student's mathematical reasoning skills before being taught with RME, PBL, and Direct learning models are in the less category after being given learning with the learning model RME, PBL and Direct students' mathematical reasoning skills are in sufficient category. Increased students' mathematical reasoning skills are in the medium category; 2). There is an improvement in students' mathematical reasoning skills after being taught with RME, PBL and Direct learning models; 3). The mathematical reasoning skills of students taught using the RME learning model were not significantly different from those taught by the PBL learning model; 4). There is a difference in the effectiveness of the learning model on improving students' mathematical reasoning skills, which is taught using a learning model RME more effective than students taught by direct learning model; 5). The students' mathematical reasoning skills are taught using the PBL learning model more effective than students taught by direct learning model; 6). Student activity during learning process using RME learning model and PBL learning models, indicating that students are very active.]]>
<![CDATA[INCREASED MOTIVATION AND RESULTS OF STUDENT MATH LEARNING THROUGH REALISTIC MATHEMATICS EDUCATION ]]>
<![CDATA[Wiwin Rita Sari]]>;
<![CDATA[Siti Mutmainah]]>
<![CDATA[ JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol 3, No 1 (2018): JME ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (1164.293 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31327/jme.v3i1.479
<![CDATA[The purpose of this study was to determine the increase motivation and results of students' mathematics learning through Realistic mathematics Education approach. The study was conducted at VIII A grade students of SMP Ma'arif 01 Seputih Raman Central Lampung in geometry material. This type of research is classroom action research. The research was conducted during two cycles with each cycle consisting of the stages of planning, action, observation, and reflection. Instruments used include questionnaires motivation to learn mathematics, observation sheets, and assessment test. Data analysis techniques using descriptive quantitative analysis obtained by converting scores into qualitative criteria. Results from this study are the increased motivation to learn mathematics students from pre-cycle to the second cycle. The result of Student Mathematics learning also increased successively from the pretest to the second cycle average of 62.88 students' mathematics learning outcomes; 76.82; and 81.36. Classical completeness obtained was 72.7%. In general implementation of learning by applying Realistic Mathematics Education approach can improve motivation and results of students' mathematics learning.]]>
<![CDATA[COMPARISON OF LEARNING MATH LEARNING RESULT STUDENTS WITH SAVI MODEL AND NHT MODEL ON STUDENT SMKN 1 KOLAKA ]]>
<![CDATA[S. Supratman]]>;
<![CDATA[Sri Wulandari Muhlis]]>
<![CDATA[ JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol 3, No 1 (2018): JME ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31327/jme.v3i1.495
<![CDATA[The formulation of the problem in this research are: (1) How the result of learning mathematics of students after taught by SAVI learning model?, (2) How the result of learning mathematics of students after taught by NHT learning model?, (3) Is the result of learning mathematics of students who taught with SAVI learning model is higher than students taught by NHT learning model. The purpose of this study are: (1) To know how the results of learning mathematics students after teaching with SAVI learning model, (2) To find out how the results of learning mathematics students after being taught with NHT learning model, (3) To determine whether the results of learning mathematics students taught by SAVI learning models higher than students taught by NHT learning models. Type of research using experimental method. The population in this study is all students of class X spread in 11 parallel classes with the number of 310 people. Sampling was done by using cluster random sampling technique. In this research as a sample taken 2 classes from the entire population that is class X A3 as experiment class 1 using SAVI learning model and class X A1 as experiment class 2 using NHT learning model. From result of data analysis obtained that: (1) result of student learning taught by using SAVI learning model which consist of 25 students show minimum value 62, maximum value 96, mean (mean) 80,36, with standard deviation 9,10; (2) student learning outcomes taught using NHT learning model consisting of 25 students showing minimum score 62, maximum value 96, mean (mean) 79,62, with standard deviation 10,512; (3) result of t-test analysis using independent sample t-test obtained tcount = 0,302 at = 0,05 with degrees of freedom (dk) = 48 obtained t table = 2,011. Because t t table then Ha is rejected and H0 is accepted. So it can be concluded that the mathematics learning outcomes of students who were taught with the SAVI model was not higher than the students taught by the NHT model.]]>
<![CDATA[THE INFLUENCE OF MACROMEDIA FLASH LEARNING ON THE STUDENTS’ MATHEMATIC CONCEPT UNDERSTANDING ]]>
<![CDATA[Hawa Liberna]]>;
<![CDATA[Diah Oga Nusantari]]>
<![CDATA[ JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol 3, No 1 (2018): JME ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31327/jme.v3i1.440
<![CDATA[This study aimed to determine the effect of Macromedia flash learning on the mathematical concepts understanding. This experimental research was conducted at the SMP PGRI 20 JAKARTA in the academic year 2016/2017. The sample of the research was the students of class VII with the number of students as many as 56 students consisting of 28 students of class VII-2 as the experimental group and 28 students consisting of grade VII-3 students as the control group, with different treatment from each skill program. Research data from each group was obtained by posttest using an instrument in the form of 10 items about the form of description by fulfilling the assessment aspect for the concept comprehension ability. The instruments used in this study had been tested in advance and all items were valid and had a high degree of reliability. Data analysis of research results using t-test by first testing the assumption of normality and homogeneity. The results showed that there was a significant influence of Macromedia Flash learning on the mathematical concepts understanding, especially in triangle and quadrilateral materials in class VII SMP PGRI 20 JAKARTA.]]>
<![CDATA[THE EFFECTIVENESS OF LEARNING MODELS REALISTIC MATHEMATICS EDUCATION AND PROBLEM BASED LEARNING TOWARD MATHEMATICAL REASONING SKILLS AT STUDENTS OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL ]]>
<![CDATA[Gemi Susanti]]>;
<![CDATA[Ahmad Rustam]]>
<![CDATA[ JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol 3, No 1 (2018): JME ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31327/jme.v3i1.534
<![CDATA[This research aims to analyze the difference effectiveness of learning model Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) and model learning problem based learning (PBL) to students' mathematical reasoning skills. The design of this research is quasi experiment with pretest-posttest control group design. The population of this study is the students of grade VIII SMPN 1 Watubangga 2015/2016 year that studying about building a flat side space. The data of mathematical reasoning skills is obtained by using the instrument in the form of mathematical reasoning test. Data analysis technique used is descriptive statistical analysis, F test with t test (paired-samples t test and independent-samples t test), at α = 0,05 . Based on the result of analysis of research data obtained that: 1). Student's mathematical reasoning skills before being taught with RME, PBL, and Direct learning models are in the less category after being given learning with the learning model RME, PBL and Direct students' mathematical reasoning skills are in sufficient category. Increased students' mathematical reasoning skills are in the medium category; 2). There is an improvement in students' mathematical reasoning skills after being taught with RME, PBL and Direct learning models; 3). The mathematical reasoning skills of students taught using the RME learning model were not significantly different from those taught by the PBL learning model; 4). There is a difference in the effectiveness of the learning model on improving students' mathematical reasoning skills, which is taught using a learning model RME more effective than students taught by direct learning model; 5). The students' mathematical reasoning skills are taught using the PBL learning model more effective than students taught by direct learning model; 6). Student activity during learning process using RME learning model and PBL learning models, indicating that students are very active.]]>
<![CDATA[INCREASED MOTIVATION AND RESULTS OF STUDENT MATH LEARNING THROUGH REALISTIC MATHEMATICS EDUCATION ]]>
<![CDATA[Wiwin Rita Sari]]>;
<![CDATA[Siti Mutmainah]]>
<![CDATA[ JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol 3, No 1 (2018): JME ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31327/jme.v3i1.479
<![CDATA[The purpose of this study was to determine the increase motivation and results of students' mathematics learning through Realistic mathematics Education approach. The study was conducted at VIII A grade students of SMP Ma'arif 01 Seputih Raman Central Lampung in geometry material. This type of research is classroom action research. The research was conducted during two cycles with each cycle consisting of the stages of planning, action, observation, and reflection. Instruments used include questionnaires motivation to learn mathematics, observation sheets, and assessment test. Data analysis techniques using descriptive quantitative analysis obtained by converting scores into qualitative criteria. Results from this study are the increased motivation to learn mathematics students from pre-cycle to the second cycle. The result of Student Mathematics learning also increased successively from the pretest to the second cycle average of 62.88 students' mathematics learning outcomes; 76.82; and 81.36. Classical completeness obtained was 72.7%. In general implementation of learning by applying Realistic Mathematics Education approach can improve motivation and results of students' mathematics learning.]]>
