cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ninin Ernawati
Contact Email
admin@iasssf.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
eaebjol@journal-iasssf.com
Editorial Address
Cluster Kukusan No 25 M, Jl. Rw. Pule I, Kukusan, Beji, Depok City, West Java 16425
Location
Kota depok,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Ex Aequo Et Bono Journal of Law (EAEBJOL)
Published by Institute for Advanced Science, Social, and Sustainable Future
ISSN : -     EISSN : 3024983X     DOI : https://doi.org/10.61511/eaebjolV1I1.2023
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Ex Aequo Et Bono Journal of Law (EAEBJOL ) is an open-access and peer-reviewed journal published by Institute for Advanced Science, Social, and Sustainable Future established in 2023. It has 1 volumes with 2 issues per year. The objective of EAEBJOL is to offer the highest quality research to the broadest possible audience. The Editorial aims to offer an academic platform for cross-border legal research. It includes but is not limited to various fields such as philosophy and theory of law, comparative law, sociology of law, international law, constitutional law, private law, economic law, environmental law, criminal law, administrative law, cyber law, human rights law, and agrarian law. Aim: To offer an academic platform for cross-border legal research. Scope: Philosophy and Theory of Law Comparative Law Sociology of Law International Law Constitutional Law Private Law Economic Law Environmental Law Criminal Law Administrative Law Cyber Law Human Rights Law Agrarian Law
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Modification of the sentencing of transgender convict Maya Shafira; Hasnaa Niditya Rosyaadah; Emilia Susanti; Gunawan Jatmiko; Damanhuri Warganegara
Ex Aequo Et Bono Journal Of Law Vol. 1 No. 1: (July) 2023
Publisher : Institute for Advanced Science, Social, and Sustainable Future

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61511/eaebjol.v1i1.2023.18

Abstract

The existence of transgender people in Indonesia cannot be accepted by society because they are considered to deviate from existing cultural values. Their status as transgender also makes it difficult to place them in correctional institutions when someone commits a crime. There is no legal certainty and there is a legal vacuum so that there is a need for criminal law modifications such as alternative punishments outside of prison for transgender inmates. This study has two aims: First to find out criminal modifications in the current punishment of transgender inmates, Second to that describe the concept of ideal criminal modification for transgender inmates. this study uses a normative juridical and empirical juridical approach with data collected through literature studies and field studies. The conclusion is there is a need for modifications in the criminal system, such as the placement of transgender prisoners as seen from their identification cards such as ID cards or passports, as well as court decisions if they have applied for a sex change and it has been legalized. In addition, alternative punishments other than imprisonment for transgender convicts can provide legal certainty for them in order to avoid a legal vacuum. Alternative punishment also serves to protect prisoners from the possibility of bullying and harassment for transgender prisoners.
The urgency of the approval of the people's representative council related to the ratification of international trade agreements (analysis of decision of mk-13-puu-xvi-2018) Diva Pitaloka
Ex Aequo Et Bono Journal Of Law Vol. 1 No. 1: (July) 2023
Publisher : Institute for Advanced Science, Social, and Sustainable Future

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61511/eaebjol.v1i1.2023.74

Abstract

The community feels they are not included in the determination to express consent (consent to be bound) in international trade agreements. The HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES is an extension of the people's hand, so the government should ask for the people's approval when deciding to participate in international agreements, especially related to trade. The people's sovereignty must be upheld in a democratic country so that the government cannot ignore the participation of the people. This problem lies in Article 11 of the 1945 Constitution and Article 10 of Law No. 24 of 2000. This article will examine in more depth whether it needs to be included in the criteria for approval by law related to international trade agreements. And is it true that the articles submitted in the petitum of the NGO to the Constitutional Court contradict the 1945 Constitution? This research is a normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach. The technique of gathering legal material is carried out by reviewing related literature and analyzing various legal references relevant to the problem under study for further analysis qualitatively and descriptively. This is done by implementing an in-depth and holistic review of multiple connections and evaluating legal materials related to issues. The study results show that all international agreements that have a broad impact, one of which is international trade agreements, should be approved by the House of Representatives in determining whether to participate in the contract. The articles in the petite submitted by NGOs are partly unconstitutional, and finally, international trade agreements should be ratified through law. Ratification, Approval of the House of Representatives, Decision of the Constitutional Court.
Pengaturan illicit enrichment di Indonesia: studi perbandingan negara Peru Rahmahwati Silvia Riani; Joko Jumadi
Ex Aequo Et Bono Journal Of Law Vol. 1 No. 1: (July) 2023
Publisher : Institute for Advanced Science, Social, and Sustainable Future

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61511/eaebjol.v1i1.2023.81

Abstract

Korupsi merupakan permasalahan besar yang harus diatasi, karena saat ini model-model korupsi semakin beragam dan lembaga-lembaga anti korupsi tidak cukup untuk menghentikan perbuatan yang tercela ini. Dewasa ini telah marak terjadi anggota Aparat Sipil Negara yang memiliki kekayaan tidak wajar (Illicit Enrichment) dan tidak dapat dipertanggungjawabkan secara hukum, antara Laporan Harta Kekayaan dengan aset yang dimiliki jumlahnya tidak sesuai atau terjadi kenaikan harta kekayaan secara drastis. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaturan Illicit Enrichment di Indonesia sebagai upaya penguatan pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi dan mengetahui pengaturan Illicit Enrichment di negara Peru. Jenis penelitian ini adalah hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perbandingan hukum, Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah data sekunder yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier yang diperoleh melalui studi dokumen. Proses analisis data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan metode analisis kualitatif.  Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan dapat ditarik dua kesimpulan Pertama Indonesia yang merupakan Negara Peserta UNCAC dan telah meratifikasi konvensi dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2006 belum mengadopsi ketentuan Pasal 20 UNCAC yaitu Illicit Enrichment. Kedua Negara Peru telah mengatur didalam KUHP tentang Illicit Enrichment terhadap pejabat yang terbukti dalam masa jabatannya memiliki kekayaan secara tidak wajar secara melawan hukum dengan memberikan sanksi antara 5 sampai 10 tahun. Laporan Harta Kekayaan menjadi jalan masuknya Illicit Enrichment di Indonesia dapat diberlakukan sebagai penguatan pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi.
Liability of launching state on space tourism Septira Putri Mulyana; Putri Raodah
Ex Aequo Et Bono Journal Of Law Vol. 1 No. 1: (July) 2023
Publisher : Institute for Advanced Science, Social, and Sustainable Future

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61511/eaebjol.v1i1.2023.91

Abstract

Current use of space as one of the economic factors supporting the country’s economic has experienced a very significant increase. The Treaty Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, Including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies (Outer Space Treaty 1967) stipulate that every activity carried out in space must be in accordance with the United Nations charter and must always maintain peace and security. one of the developing commercial activities is space tourism. This research is a normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach. The technique of gathering legal material is carried out by reviewing related literature and analyzing various legal references relevant to the problem under study for further analysis qualitatively and descriptively. This article will examine in depth related to whether the existing space law conventions are still relevant to regulating space tourism activities nowadays? And how the launcher state liability in the event of space tourism accidents?. This article conclude that some  the existing space law conventions are still relevant to regulating space tourism activities nowadays. And the launcher state liability are divided into two aspects. Based on liability convention and warswa convention. This is because space tourism activity use two types of aerospace.
Exclusion of the principle of non-refoulement in article 33 paragraph 2 of the 1951 refuge convention Vincent Godana Yatani; Mohammad Safrin; Diangsa Wagian
Ex Aequo Et Bono Journal Of Law Vol. 1 No. 1: (July) 2023
Publisher : Institute for Advanced Science, Social, and Sustainable Future

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61511/eaebjol.v1i1.2023.108

Abstract

This study aims to examine whether non-refoulement in the refugee context has attained the status of a jus cogens norm or not and how the exceptions in Article 33(2) should be understood if non-refoulement is indeed considered as a jus cogens. This research adopts a normative juridical analysis approach to critically examine the status of the principle of non-refoulement. The study concludes that the principle of non-refoulement qualifies as a norm of jus cogens based on several key criteria. Firstly, it satisfies the requirements of a jus cogens norm by addressing matters of common concern to the international community, serving humanitarian purposes, and aligning with principles outlined in the UN Charter relating to treaties and the use of force in international relations. Secondly, the exception outlined in Article 33 Paragraph 2 of the Refugee Convention does not alter the non-derogable nature of the principle of non-refoulement. The fulfillment of Article 33 Paragraph 2 is contingent upon strict conditions and necessitates objective evidence to be provided by a country. The research is intended to contribute to the understanding of the normative status of the principle of non-refoulement within the framework of international refugee law.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 1 No. 1: (July) 2023