cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
TIMBO MANGARANAP SIRAIT
Contact Email
lppmuta45@uta45jakarta.ac.id
Phone
+6281221003683
Journal Mail Official
lppmuta45@uta45jakarta.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Sunter Permai Raya, Jakarta Utara. Fakultas Hukum
Location
Kota adm. jakarta utara,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
JURNAL HUKUM STAATRECHTS
Published by Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta
ISSN : -     EISSN : 24610798     DOI : https://doi.org/10.52447/sr.v6i1
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Jurnal Hukum STAATRECHTS adalah jurnal berkala yang diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta. Jurnal ini dimaksudkan sebagai upaya untuk mempublikasikan gagasan-gagasan di bidang hukum dalam rangka mendorong kemajuan pemikiran hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum STAATRECHTS terbit 1 tahun 2 kali, pada periode bulan Juni dan bulan Desember
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 4 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 1, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Staatrechts" : 4 Documents clear
KEDUDUKAN HUKUM PEMBANTUAN / PENEMPATAN OPERATOR RTGC PT. PELINDO II (PERSERO) DI PT. JAKARTA INTERNATIONAL CONTAINER TERMINAL (JICT) BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 13 TAHUN 2003 TENTANG KETENAGAKERJAAN (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PHI No: 137/PDT.Sus-PHI/2017/PN.JKT.PST) Roder BA Sihotang
JURNAL HUKUM STAATRECHTS Vol 1, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Staatrechts
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52447/sr.v1i1.1591

Abstract

ABSTRACT THE  POSITION OF  LAW  THE  POSITION  IN OPERATOR RTGC  PT. PELINDO II (PERSERO) IN PT. CONTAINER TERMINAL INTERNATIONAL ENERGY JAKARTA (JICT) BASED ON CONTATUTION NO. 13 YEAR 2003 ABOUT ENERGY WORKERS (STUDI CASE IN DECISION PHI NO.137/PDT.SUS-PHI/2017/PN.JKT.PST)  As the development country, Indonesia has strong, wishes for doing the contruction especially in economy, for the while, on of the way for ever body in getting a job is doing as the formal or informal. Athough this case very a pity while be a entrepreneur to do the protest to be againt his own power workers, the which is done by PT. Container Terminal International Jakarta as a accuser to be against labour united of PT. Container Terminal International Jakarta with the teory sketch fair and prosperity teory, and also to use normative yuridis approach. This research in studying with using library study to use primary law material as the rule of legislation, secondary law material tertier like company, law literature. The law of power worked and the law material tertier like the opinion of the experts, law dictionary. The result of this research can be making conclusion that, the finishing of positive law in Indonesia for helping or to make the man on the right place as operator RTGC in PT. PElindo II (PErsero) in PT. Container Terminal International Jakarta are to submit protest at 17 Mei 2017 at court. The relationship industrial central Jakarta for the eases which are not giving the fair for the worker are happening the dismissal as a side without any the mistakes and to be caused so that must be gotten become miss receive or miss accept until all become lost. Happening the workers mutation for active man in workers organization workers so the concentration seatter everwhere, so the organization workers become minus or the weakness to struggle the qualification of the workers. The judge consideration at the definite PHI No: 137/PDT.Sus-PHI/2017/PN.JKT.PST are very very clear and fair for the workers PT.JICT which has done not fair by one in authority, because of the judge considenation one given the acceused protest about the definite the absolute judgement, and how to say that the judge has the relationship industry for in judiciary centre Jakarta don’t have the absolute judgement in this case. In the definite has been given the power for the labour united for the protest to be against and the grief the power workers in democration the power workers that had been wrong was.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG SAHAM MINORITAS PADA PERSEROAN TERBATAS TERTUTUP DALAM RANGKA PENGENDALIAN PERUSAHAAN SEBAGAI UPAYA UNTUK MEWUJUDKAN KEADILAN BERDASARKAN PANCASILA Mustaqim Mustaqim
JURNAL HUKUM STAATRECHTS Vol 1, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Staatrechts
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52447/sr.v1i1.1505

Abstract

AbstractThe difference in majority shareholders with minorities is in ownership of the number of shares, often in principle, the majority shareholder causes minority shareholders in a weak position. This condition makes minority shareholders treated unfairly by majority shareholders. The GMS does not reflect legal protection for minority shareholders. This is because in every decision making in the GMS it is always based on the quorum of attendance by referring to the majority of votes present. This is detrimental to the interests of minority shareholders, because without the presence of minority shareholders the GMS is held while minority shareholders have the same rights and obligations and responsibilities to the Company. The treatment of majority shareholders against minority shareholders has not been able to guarantee minority shareholders to obtain justice based on Pancasila justice. This is because the majority shareholders in a closed limited company still have full control over the company.Keywords :  Legal protection, minority shares and justice
PERUSAHAAN JASA PENGURUSAN TRANSPORTASI (PJPT) SEBAGAI "PENGANGKUT" KAITANNYA DENGAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DAN PEMBAHARUAN DALAM RANGKA PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM PENGANGKUTAN NASIONAL Dyah Ersita Yustanti
JURNAL HUKUM STAATRECHTS Vol 1, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Staatrechts
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52447/sr.v1i1.1506

Abstract

AbstractCarriage of goods activities is needed in the mobilization of goods and services for Indonesia which consists of archipelagic country, so the business activities of expeditor plays an important role. The expeditor which is nowadays known as Freight Forwarding Company (Perusahaan Jasa Pengurusan Transportasi (PJPT)) pursuant to Article 86 of the Indonesian Commercial Code was the agent and now has experiencing development, as it is become the "carrier". This development brings impacts to the responsibility so that it was obtained 2 (two) main issues: (1) Why is it necessary to develop a law for the protection of PJPT in its capacity as a "carrier", and (2) How is the responsibility of PJPT as a "carrier" for the possibility of risk of loss?. From the result of the research, it can be concluded that: (1) the Government has made the regulation concerning the obligation to insure the responsibility of PJPT but has not been implemented by PJPT and (2): In the Indonesian Commercial Code, the expeditor is the agent and the bill of lading issued by the carrier, but the Ministerial Regulation defines PJPT as "carrier" because it can issue a bill of lading so that PJPT becomes a principal, also that the Ministerial Regulation enforces the international customs and regulations in the carriage of goods in Indonesian. Keyword: PJPT,  Legal Protection, Development Law
PENGATURAN HAK KEBEBASAN BERKEYAKINAN PENGHAYAT KEPERCAYAAN TERHADAP TUHAN YANG MAHA ESA DALAM PERSPEKTIF NEGARA HUKUM DEMOKRATIS INDONESIA Tuti Widyaningrum
JURNAL HUKUM STAATRECHTS Vol 1, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Staatrechts
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52447/sr.v1i1.1507

Abstract

ABSTRACT  Article Number 28E point (1) and point (2) of UUD 1945 mentioned human rights enactment that show freedom for Indonesian citizen to choose their religion and belief, hold conscience and manifestating their ritual and consciences.That Article is the guarantee of human rights and rights of citizen of Indonesia in the the right of conscience with the Almighty God.The article 28E poin (2) UUD 1945 is closely related with article 29 poin (2) UUD 1945 that mentioned the state guarantee the freedom of religion and believ and to worship according to their religion and conscience. With the contitutional guarantee, the right of religious freedom of the religious people can enjoyed the derivation of that rights in forum internum also forum eksternum. But not so with the believers, they still have neglect of citizen rights because different faith to interpreting Belief in the one and only God. This research will analyze, 1).How the regulation of the rights of conscience believers of God in Indonesian democratic state law perspective  2) How implementation of the rights of conscience believers of God in Indonesian democratic state law perspective  3) How to make ideal regulation to regulate the rights of conscience believers of God in Indonesian democratic state law perspective.  The research method is yuridis normatif. The result of this research is first, there is no regulation about protection of the rights of regious freedom of believers, and existing law just fulfill practical needs without strategical action to protect the rights of religious freedom that can setled down equaly between believers and religious people before the law and governance. The conclusion is the emptyness of law in regulating among believers can only has solution with law making that gives special protection of the rights of religious freedom of believers. The suggestion to legislative is very importance to making regulation that ruled of the rights of religious freedom believers that can give them the advantage og democratic contitutional state for fulfilling rights of citizen as same as religious people.   Key words : Rights of Conscience, Citizen Rights, Believers of God

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 4

 1 

Filter by Year

2018 2018


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 6, No 1 (2023): JURNAL STAATRECHTS Vol 5, No 2 (2022): JURNAL STAATRECHTS Vol 5, No 1 (2022): JURNAL STAATRECHTS Vol 4, No 2 (2021): JURNAL STAATRECHTS Vol 4, No 1 (2021): JURNAL STAATRECHTS Vol 3, No 2 (2020): JURNAL STAATRECHTS Vol 3, No 1 (2020): JURNAL STAATRECHTS Vol 1, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Staatrechts