cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
judex.laguens@gmail.com
Phone
+6281282827983
Journal Mail Official
mail@judexlaguens.ikahi.or.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Medan Merdeka Utara No.9, RT.2/RW.3, Gambir, Kecamatan Gambir, Kota Jakarta Pusat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 10110
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Strategi Memperkuat Integritas Lembaga Peradilan Indonesia
Published by Mahkamah Agung Ri
ISSN : 30257182     EISSN : -     DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13738647
ISSN: 3025-7182 Penerbit: Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI) 0009-0000-1749-8018 : ORCID Fokus dan Ruang Lingkup Judex Laguens bertujuan untuk menyediakan wadah bagi akademisi, peneliti, dan praktisi untuk mempublikasikan artikel penelitian asli atau artikel review. Ruang lingkup artikel yang dimuat dalam jurnal ini membahas berbagai topik di bidang hukum dan peradilan. Frekuensi: 3 terbitan per tahun (April, Agustus, dan Desember) Judex Laguens merupakan jurnal akses terbuka dan peer-review yang bertujuan untuk menyebarkan hasil penelitian atau pemikiran asli yang fokus pada isu-isu di bidang hukum dan peradilan. Penulis diundang untuk mengirimkan naskah yang termasuk dalam lingkup Judex Set Lex Laguens. Artikel-artikel yang diterbitkan di Judex Set Lex Laguens melalui proses peer-review double-blind. Oleh karena itu, diterima atau tidaknya karya ilmiah tersebut merupakan hak Dewan Redaksi berdasarkan rekomendasi peer reviewer. Silakan baca informasi tentang proses peer-review. Mohon membaca dan memahami pedoman penulis dalam penyusunan naskah. Penulis yang menyerahkan naskah ke editor harus mematuhi pedoman dan template penulis. Jika naskah yang dikirimkan tidak sesuai dengan pedoman atau menggunakan format yang berbeda, maka naskah tersebut akan ditolak oleh tim editorial sebelum ditinjau. Tim redaksi hanya akan menerima naskah yang memenuhi persyaratan format yang ditentukan.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 7 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 2 No 2 (2024)" : 7 Documents clear
PERNIKAHAN DINI : LATAR SOSIAL, IMPLIKASI DAN ALTERNATIF SOLUSI HIDAYATULLAH, MUH SAFRANI
Judex Laguens Vol 2 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.2.2.8.2024.265-283

Abstract

Penelitian lapangan (filed research) yang mengambil setting lokasi di kabupaten Lombok Tengah dengan judul “Pernikahan Dini, Latar Sosial, Implikasi dan Alternatif Solusi” ini fokus permasalahannya menyorot latar sosial fenomena praktek pernikahan usia dini sebagai imbas dominasi dikabulkannya permohonan dispensasi kawin di Pengadilan Agama Praya sebagai salah satu penyumbang porsi besar di wilayah Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Mataram, selain untuk melihat implikasi dan mencari solusi alternatif pencegahannya. Melalui pendekatan sosio-empiris, data-data observasi, dokumentasi, interview dan kuisioner (Pemohon dan Anak Dispensasi Kawin, Pimpinan dan Hakim sebagai responden) dilakukan analisa dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif. Hasil analisis menunjukkan PA. Praya pada 3 tahun terakhir mengabulkan permohonan Dispensasi Kawin lebih dari 90%, aspek menghindari zina (90%) adalah alasan utama pengajuan, keinginan pribadi (40%) sebagai faktor dominan orangtua menikahkan anak di bawah umur dan terjadinya kondisi ketidakharmonisan rumah tangga (34%) adalah dampak dominannya. Tawaran alternatif strategi penelitian adalah Optimalisasi Kapasitas Anak, Penciptaan Lingkungan Kondusi Pencegahan Perkawinan Anak, Aksesabilitas dan Penguatan Layanan, Penguatan Regulasi dan Kelembagaan serta Penguatan Koordinasi Pemangku Kepentingan. Peran dan dukungan, keluarga, masyarakat, lembaga Pendidikan dan pemerintah melalui penguatan dan kepastian regulasi adalah strategi yang paling tepat guna melakukan pencegahan terhadap pernikahan di bawah umur ini sebagai simpulan dan saran terbaik dalam penelitian ini
Pengenalan Amicus Curiae sebagai Instrumen Hukum Formal untuk Meningkatkan Integritas Peradilan Johannes Edison Haholongan
Judex Laguens Vol 2 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.2.2.8.2024.237-264

Abstract

The submission of Amicus Curiae’s brief in the court has created a new paradigm that emerges and develops within the society itself. Such practice, which had already been developed in many judiciaries in other countries, could in fact be utilized by the Indonesian judiciary as a means to improve its integrity, namely by capturing the development of legal values and sense of justice within the society at large. Nevertheless, currently there have been no formal legal grounds to regulate the Amicus Curiae. Consequently, such condition has created confusion within those who presented themselves to become Amicus Curiae in the court. This paper intends to examine the possibility of formal recognition of Amicus Curiae as a full-fledged legal instrument in the court. Moreover, this paper also investigates various appropriate legal basis to accommodate the formal application of the Amicus Curiae in the court. Finally, this paper will endeavor to argue that the application of the Amicus Curiae as a formal legal instrument could be used by the Indonesian judiciary to enhance its integrity within the society itself.
Strategi Prebunking Terhadap Potensi Hoaks yang Menyerang Hakim Hasrullah
Judex Laguens Vol 2 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.2.2.8.2024.203-218

Abstract

This research discusses prebunking strategies as an effort to prevent hoaxes that have the potential to attack the judges' profession. Judges who are embedded as a noble profession legally and socially are often in the spotlight in the process of enforcing the law and seeking justice. the digital era, all information is now easily accessed also the ease of providing and perspectives new challenges for the judicial profession. The ease of obtaining and conveying information is the starting point for the spread of hoaxes, namely disinformation. The disruption of misleading information is feared to manipulate opinions and even erode public trust in judges and the courts. This situation has a fatal impact on credibility, good name the ideals of justice. The Supreme Court places ethics, from within. The effectiveness and efficiency of its implementation will also affect trust in the law. However, external factors such as today's digital communication are the most important part to be considered in maintaining public trust from misleading information. Prebunking is a preventative approach based on inoculation theory, a persuasive approach that aims to increase public understanding of how to identify and respond to misinformation before it spreads.
Meneropong Korelasi Integritas, Kesejahteraan Dan Putusan Hakim: (Studi Literasi Sejarah Islam Untuk Hakim Indonesia) Rachmi; Ineke Dwi Rahma Putri
Judex Laguens Vol 2 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.2.2.8.2024.187-202

Abstract

The integrity and welfare of judges are always hotly discussed, especially when they are associated with the value of justice in judicial decisions. In this study, the researcher conducted the main study of integrity,  correlation with the justice of judges' decisions during the companionship period. This research uses a normative approach with literacy studies as primary sources and is using the prescriptive analytical method. The results show that the integrity of judges has a strong formation of fair judicial decisions, while the level of welfare of judges does not guarantee the public justice from each judge's decision. However, welfare needs to be improved to encourage judges to have a professional attitude so that it can support the justice of judges’ decisions as long as it the political interests of the government. The reflection of the above historical literacy for Indonesian judges is that it is important to maintain personal integrity to ensure the justice of the decisions they will render by applying a meaningful life pattern or at least a ‘good life’ pattern.
AI Hakim: Merevolusi Peradilan Yang Berintegritas, Bermartabat, Dan Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Hakim Zico Junius
Judex Laguens Vol 2 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.2.2.8.2024.141-166

Abstract

The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has offered transformative opportunities in various sectors, including the justice system. In the Indonesian context, the implementation of AI as a judge promises the potential to address the integrity and efficiency challenges faced by the judicial system, which has been tainted by cases of corruption and susceptibility to subjective bias. By leveraging AI's ability to process big data quickly and objectively, it is expected to create a more transparent decision-making process, reduce bias, and minimize the potential for corruption. This research discusses the implementation of AI in the role of a judge in Indonesia's criminal justice system, examines the potential efficiency, objectivity, and transparency offered by AI, and explores the synergy between AI and human judges in improving the quality of legal services. Through theoretical analysis, this research highlights the importance of standards and protocol development, transparency, training and education, and regular evaluation in AI integration. Cooperation between AI and human judges not only enriches the decision-making process in the judiciary but also maintains the humanistic core of law. This research shows that with a careful and ethical approach, the integration of AI in the justice system can strengthen fairness, improve efficiency, and ensure that technology supports, not replace, the discretion of human judges, opening a new era in a fairer, more efficient, and dignified judiciary.
Diskursus Pemenuhan Kesejahteraan Hakim Sebagai Pencegahan Judicial Corruption Melalui Rancangan Undang-Undang Jabatan Hakim: Studi Komparatif Dengan Negara Amerika dan Kanada Daffa Ladro; Maghfira Nur Khaliza Fauzi
Judex Laguens Vol 2 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.2.2.8.2024.167-186

Abstract

Judges' welfare provision has stagnated, affecting their integrity. The increasingly complex problem actually stems from regulations that currently cannot accommodate all financial rights and facilities of judges. For example, in the dynamics related to the amount of basic salary and allowances in Government Regulation No. 94/2012 until its first amendment, it is still said to be very minimal, as well as Decision No. 23 P/HUM/2018 which revoked the basic salary of judges with Civil Servants (PNS) but there was no follow-up after the decision to form a legal umbrella. Financial intervention will certainly have a great potential to occur among judges, when effectiveness is present due to the lack of the state in ensuring the welfare of judges, so that later decisions are given based on how much finance is offered by individuals through transactional activities that lead to judicial corruption. The research method uses normative jurisprudence referring to laws and regulations as well as literature studies in the form of books, journals, and other literature. The research is prescriptive in nature to find ideal ideas accompanied by comparative studies to examine legal systems in other countries. The results show that the problematic system of judges‘ salaries, as well as the limited regulations, need to emulate the United States, which applies constitutional salary protection and prohibits congress from reducing judges’ salaries. In Canada there is a judicial commission function to conduct investigations related to the adequacy of salaries and other amounts that must be disclosed to government-appointed judges periodically. The construction of the regulation of financial rights and facilities of judges needs to pay attention to the principles of judicial remuneration and research related to its effect on improving performance, to be accommodated later in the Judgeship Bill as a legal umbrella to improve the welfare of judges in Indonesia.
Interpretasi Nilai Sosial Budaya Dan Hukum Islam Dalam Rumah Khas Adat Penjalin Masyarakat Islam Majalengka Naily A'la, Afrida; Nisfatur Rohmah; Wahidah Zein Br. Siregar
Judex Laguens Vol 2 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.2.2.8.2024.219-236

Abstract

Indonesian, as one of the countries with the largest Muslim population in the world, has a variety of cultures, one of which is the architectural style of houses which requires socio-cultural values ​​and Islamic law. This article aims to examine socio-cultural values ​​and Islamic law in the architectural style of the traditional Majalengka penjalin house. This research uses a library study approach by using library sources as primary sources and analyzed using prescriptive analytical methods. The results of the research show that the traditional penjalin house in the Majalengka Islamic Community is full of socio-cultural values ​​and Islamic legal values, including the values ​​of socio-cultural life depicted in the form of stairs, Islamic legal values ​​depicted with 17 pillars indicating the number of prayer cycles, 3 windows. which opens out as a depiction of the values ​​of Faith, Islam, and Ihsan as well as the value of constitutional relations which are depicted in three carved patterns located in one of the rooms meaning that the occupants of the house are descendants of three kingdoms (Cirebon, Pajajaran, and Mataram).

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 7