cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Egi Sukma Baihaki
Contact Email
egisukma_baihaki@yahoo.com
Phone
+6281511960291
Journal Mail Official
tanzilsadra@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Lebak Bulus II No. 2, RT 4/RW 4, Cilandak Barat, Cilandak, Jakarta Selatan, 12430, Indonesia Phone: 021-29446460 (ext. 409) Fax: 02129235438
Location
Kota adm. jakarta selatan,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Tanzil: Jurnal Studi Al-Quran
Published by Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sadra
ISSN : 2460917     EISSN : 25030612     DOI : https://doi.org/10.20871/tjsq
Core Subject : Religion,
Religion
TANZĪL is a refereed academic journal published by Sekolah Tinggi Filsafat Islam (STFI) Sadra in Jakarta. The journal conscientiously aims to provide a scholarly platform for critical and informed articles, particularly in Qur’anic studies. The article arises such issues in the form of literature study, individual research, and critical book review, arise out of classical and contemporary discussions from varied traditions, either Eastern, Western in the hope to contribute the resolution of various It theoretical, methodological, and practical issues in the aforementioned fields.
Arjuna Subject : Seni dan Humaniora - Studi Agama
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 1 No. 2 (2016): April" : 6 Documents clear
TAFSĪR AL-HUKAMĀ’: MEMOTRET PERSINGGUNGAN TAFSIR AL-QUR’AN DAN TRADISI HIKMAH Asep N. Musadad
Tanzil: Jurnal Studi Al-Quran Vol. 1 No. 2 (2016): April
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam (STAI) Sadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (678.495 KB) | DOI: 10.20871/tjsq.v1i2.26

Abstract

This paper discusses a neglected exegetical tradition in the Qur’anic studies, namely the heritage of “tafsīr al-ẖukamā’”, (tafsīr of the theosophers/ẖikmah masters) which is the representation of the ẖikmah (theosophical) tradition in the Islamic philosophy. In addition to the study of “tafsīr al-falāsifah” (tafsir of Hellenistic/Peripatetic philosophers), this heritage is an area of study that needs further exploration in the light of philosophical school of Qur’anic exegesis. It is mainly motivated by the revision of the history of Islamic philosophy in general, that must include “ẖikmah” tradition as the integral part. In turn, the study of Qur’anic exegesis should also correspond with the development of the discourse. Started with a discussion related to the ẖikmah tradition, this paper focuses on two major issues. Firstly, it highlights the contact between Qur’anic exegesis and ẖikmah tradition in a historical and chronological context. Secondly, it also explains the intersection of both in epistemological relation. This research shows that through examining some Qur’anic commentaries written by theolosophers such as Suhrāwardī, Mullā Shadrā, up to the current tradition, the treasury tafsīr hukamā’ has a rich but still abandoned material. In addition, this tradition also has a distinguishing epistemological characteristic compared to other with tafsir traditions.
POSISI TASAWUF TEORETIS DALAM TINJAUAN LOGIKA TAFSIR AL-QUR’AN Cipta Bakti Gama
Tanzil: Jurnal Studi Al-Quran Vol. 1 No. 2 (2016): April
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam (STAI) Sadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (621.397 KB) | DOI: 10.20871/tjsq.v1i2.27

Abstract

This paper addresses the issue of how the position of theoretical Sufism in the interpretation of the Qur’an. Departing from some reasons for rejecting the validity of Sufistic method of Qur’anic interpretation (isharī method), the author sees the need to explain the nature of theoretical Sufism and its position based on the logic of Qur’anic exegesis. Some important points which the author tries to show in this paper are five principles, as follows: First, the theoretical Sufism could be positioned as a source of interpretation of the Qur’an. Second, shuhūd ‘irfānī which is the main foundation of theoretical Sufism could be positioned as a source of interpretation of the Qur’an, in the context of the disclosure of meaning, not in the explanation of it. Third, theoretical Sufism might be used as a source or indicator to determine a position in the interpretation of the Qur’an. Fourth, every hypothetical (zhannī) proposition in the Qur’ānic interpretation must not conflict with the certaint (qaṭ’ī) rational proposition in the theoretical Sufism. Fifth, Sufistic interpretation of the Qur’an is a particular form of a set of method of Qur’anic interpretation, which can be combined with the other methods, to achieve an eclectic and holistic interpretation of the Qur’an. The author also gives an example as the application of those five principles in the interpretation of the meaning of khalīfah fī al-ardh in al-Baqarah [2]: 30.
TAFSIR FITRI IMAM KHOMENI Ammar Fauzi
Tanzil: Jurnal Studi Al-Quran Vol. 1 No. 2 (2016): April
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam (STAI) Sadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (551.213 KB) | DOI: 10.20871/tjsq.v1i2.28

Abstract

This paper is intended to identify the axis of the Sufism tendency of Imam Khomeini and his interpretation of irfani-isyari (legal-gnostical). In view of Imam Khomeini, inborn nature (fitrah) is considered as the main basic for self-knowledge (ma’rifat alnafs). According to him, irfan (gnostic) basically is the exegesis itself. And if the soul of irfan is fitrah and irfan is a form of Qur’anic exegesis, then the fitrah is also part of the core layer of gnostic interpretation. Through the observation of his works is enough to reveal the fact one of the layers of his intellectual personality as an interpreter who greatly accentuate spiritual revelation. He believes that irfan is inseparable from interpretation, because essentially, irfan is the interpretation itself. The naming of this irfan model is initiated from his mystical letters. It is known that all interpretations of Sufism and Imam Khomeini’s essence are essentially interpretations and explanations of verses of the Qur’an and hadith (tradition).
PARTISIPASI POLITIK PEREMPUAN DALAM AL-QUR’AN Muhammad al-Caff; Siti Zinatun
Tanzil: Jurnal Studi Al-Quran Vol. 1 No. 2 (2016): April
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam (STAI) Sadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (593.893 KB) | DOI: 10.20871/tjsq.v1i2.29

Abstract

The issue of women’s political participation rarely finds a place in the Sunni and Shiite’s conventional jurisprudence thought, to imply that women should not have a political office and that their duties are solely rooted in the domestic sphere alone. In this case, one of the problems that deserves to employed in scholarly studies is the political rights of women according to the Qur’anic paradigm. Through the method of al-tafsīr al-jāmi’, this paper attempts to provide the scholarly debates concerning women’s political participation based on certain Qur’anic verses. This research shows three different major views concerning women’s political participation; the absolute prohibition, the absolute permission, and the alternative view. All are based on the interpretation of certain Qur’anic verses. The second is considered as more compatible with the principles of democracy. However, the significance of the different views concerning women’s political participation in the Qur’an lies on the fact that it has the holistic and multi-layered views on women’s political participation within each particular contexts accross the time, not a monolitic view limited to one alternataive
PENAFSIRAN BĀTHINĪ (ESOTERIS) THABĀTHABĀ’Ī DALAM TAFSĪR AL-MĪZĀN Kerwanto
Tanzil: Jurnal Studi Al-Quran Vol. 1 No. 2 (2016): April
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam (STAI) Sadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (612.374 KB) | DOI: 10.20871/tjsq.v1i2.30

Abstract

This paper is a review to Rosihon Anwar’s book titled “Menelusuri Ruang Batin alQur’an: Belajar Tafsir Batini pada ‘Allāmah Thabāthabā’ī”. It tries to give a picture of two important themes in this book. The first is about the nature of esoteric interpretations in the view of Thabāthabā’ī. The second is Thabāthabā’ī’s position toward hadīth that come from Shia Imams in his esoteric interpretations. The study is also to give a critical analysis to Rosihon’s idea on: (1). The periodization birth of Shia esoteric interpretations; (2). Equating of the models of Thabāthabā’ī’s esoteric interpretations with Sufi’s; (3). Thabāthabā’ī’s position toward hadīth be based from Shia Imams; and (4). Claims that, Thabāthabā’ī’s esoteric interpretations violate the context of the word.
SYUKUR DAN PUJIAN MENURUT MUHAMMAD SHALEH DARAT AL-SAMARANI: KAJIAN ATAS (QS. Al-FĀTIHAH [1]: 2) TAFSĪR FAIDH AL-RAHMĀN Egi Sukma Baihaki
Tanzil: Jurnal Studi Al-Quran Vol. 1 No. 2 (2016): April
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam (STAI) Sadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (684.072 KB) | DOI: 10.20871/tjsq.v1i2.31

Abstract

Praise and gratitude (syukr) are closely related to forms of worshiping of a servant to his Lord. Many verses of the Qur’an show this as it is associated with favors that God has bestowed upon His creation. However, there are still many people who neglect and forget to thank and praise God for all the blessings that God has given to them. Either because of their own humiliation, as well as the weakness of those who are unable to understand the nature of gratitude and praise itself. This article will see how this message appears in (QS. al-Fātiẖah [1]: 2) where Allah orders his worshipers to thank and praise him, while God Himself Who started praising Him. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to introduce how such views and ideas appear through Muhammad Sholeh Darat al-Samarani, mainly when interpreting (QS. al-Fātiẖah [1]: 2) in his book, Tafsīr Faidh al-Raẖmān.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2016 2016


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): October Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): April Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): Oktober Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): April Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Oktober Vol. 2 No. 2 (2018): April Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): Oktober Volume 1 Number 2, April 2016 Vol. 1 No. 2 (2016): April Volume 1 Number 1, October 2015 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2015): October More Issue