cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Kadek Agus Sudiarawan
Contact Email
agus_sudiarawan@unud.ac.id
Phone
+6281916412362
Journal Mail Official
agus_sudiarawan@unud.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jalan Pulau Bali No.1 Denpasar
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
Kertha Patrika
Published by Universitas Udayana
ISSN : 0215899X     EISSN : 25799487     DOI : 10.24843
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Focus in Scope Jurnal Kertha Patrika terbit tiga (3) kali setahun: yaitu bulan April, Agustus, dan Desember. Jurnal ini adalah jurnal yang bertemakan Ilmu Hukum, dengan manfaat dan tujuan bagi perkembangan Ilmu Hukum, dengan mengedepankan sifat orisinalitas, kekhususan dan kemutakhiran artikel pada setiap terbitannya. Tujuan dari publikasi Jurnal ini adalah untuk memberikan ruang mempublikasikan pemikiran kritis hasil penelitian orisinal, maupun gagasan konseptual dari para akademisi, peneliti, maupun praktisi yang belum pernah dipublikasikan pada media lainnya. Fokus dan lingkup penulisan (Focus & Scope) dalam Jurnal ini meliputi: Hukum Tata Negara; Hukum Administrasi; Hukum Pidana; Hukum Perdata; Hukum Internasional; Hukum Acara; Hukum Adat; Hukum Bisnis; Hukum Kepariwisataan; Hukum Lingkungan; Hukum Dan Masyarakat; Hukum Informasi Teknologi Dan Transaksi Elektronik; Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia; Hukum Kontemporer.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 152 Documents
 12   13   14   15   16 
Hak Untuk Dilupakan Sebagai Implementasi Perlindungan Hukum Korban Cyberbullying (Studi Komparatif Indonesia dengan Korea Selatan) Zahrani Salsabila; Aji Lukman Ibrahim
Kertha Patrika Vol 45 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KP.2023.v45.i02.p03

Abstract

This study aims to determine legal policies regarding cyberbullying in Indonesia dan South Korea, forms of legal protection, fulfillment of the right to be forgotten and so that Indonesia can have legal arguments that side with victims as a form of protection for victims of cyberbullying. This normative juridical law research is complemented by interviews and uses comparative, statutory, and conceptual approaches. The results of this study indicate that Indonesia has not been able to exercise the right to be forgotten in dealing with cyberbullying because there needs to be a precise mechanism in its legal policies. In addition, the lack of socialization regarding the implementation of the right to be forgotten for victims of cyberbullying causes low public awareness in reporting. Therefore, strategic steps are needed, such as issuing a Ministerial Regulation regarding the mechanism for deletion, the existence of a particular complaint, contacting persons, and conducting outreach and education to the public. Hence, they want to report on acts of cyberbullying.
Perbandingan Konsep Recidive dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 dengan Criminal Act of South Korea Busthomi Arifin; Rayhan Afief Arfarizky; Rusmilawati Windari
Kertha Patrika Vol 45 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KP.2023.v45.i02.p04

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to explore the concept of criminal recidivism between Indonesia and South Korea. The research method employed is normative research using a statute approach, a comparative approach, and a conceptual approach. The research findings reveal that Indonesia and South Korea regulate recidivism with distinct approaches that correspond to the characteristics of each country. In Indonesia, the regulations on recidivism are stipulated in Article 23 of the Indonesian Penal Code, while in South Korea, they are found in Articles 35-36 of the Criminal Act of South Korea. A notable difference is that in South Korea, an individual is considered a recidivist if they repeat a criminal offense that is punishable by imprisonment or a more severe penalty, such as penal servitude or the death penalty. In Indonesia, the aggravation of punishment for recidivism is limited to a one-third increase from the initial penalty, whereas in South Korea, it can be escalated up to twice the initial penalty. Recommendations that can be considered based on the comparison between the two countries include a fair evaluation of recidivism cases, an effective rehabilitation system, a focus on prevention efforts, proportional punishment, as well as enhanced research and monitoring.

Page 16 of 16 | Total Record : 152

 12   13   14   15   16 

Filter by Year

2008 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 45 No 2 (2023) Vol 45 No 1 (2023) Vol 44 No 3 (2022) Vol 44 No 2 (2022) Vol 44 No 1 (2022) Vol 43 No 3 (2021) Vol 43 No 2 (2021) Vol 43 No 1 (2021) Vol 42 No 3 (2020) Vol 42 No 2 (2020) Vol 42 No 1 (2020) Vol 41 No 3 (2019) Vol 41 No 2 (2019) Vol 41 No 1 (2019) Vol 40 No 01 (2018) Vol 40 No 3 (2018) Vol 40 No 2 (2018) Vol 39 No 03 (2017) Vol 39 No 01 (2017) Vol 39 No 2 (2017) Vol 38 No 3 (2016) Vol 38 No 2 (2016) Vol 38 No 1 (2016) Vol 33 No 1 (2008) More Issue