cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Published by Universitas Padjadjaran
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 483 Documents
 45   46   47   48   49 
The Rule of Attribution for Peacekeepers Post-Dutch Supreme Court’s Rulings on Mothers of Srebrenica in 2019: A Discourse on Presumptive v. Preventive Interpretation Evan Tobias; Imam Mulyana
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 10, No 2 (2023): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Peacekeeping operations have become an integral component of the United Nations in promoting global peace and security. Yet, as demands increase to hold peacekeepers accountable for their misdeeds, the legal principle of attribution within the framework of the law of responsibility remains ambiguous and difficult to define. Hence, this study aims to contribute to the discourse on the attribution of the Peacekeepers' conduct, especially on the presumptive v. preventive interpretation of Article 7 Draft Articles on Responsibility of International Organizations. Under the presumptive interpretation, the peacekeeper’s action is presumed to be attributed to the UN; however, attribution can be rebutted if Troop Contributing States (TCS) exercise control over the peacekeepers. In contrast, preventive interpretation argues that attribution must be determined by which entity, TCS or the UN, has the power to prevent the alleged conduct. This study analyzed how the Dutch Supreme Court’s rulings in 2019 approached the question of attribution toward the Dutch Battalion during the mission of UNPROFOR. The Supreme Court found that the action of the Dutch Battalion was attributable to the Netherlands since the Netherlands fulfills the elements of effective control as governed under Article 8 ARSIWA. Moreover, the Supreme Court rejected the preventive interpretation earlier endorsed in the Nuhanovic case. This study employed a normative juridical approach. This study argues that the Court’s rulings on presumptive interpretation are aligned with the practices of the UN’s peacekeepers and the intended purpose of Article 7 DARIO, which emphasizes attribution on factual consideration.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v10n2.a4
The Opportunities for Surrogacy Legalization Between the Right to Have Children and A Loophole of Trafficking Wawan Edi Prastiyo; Gde Made Swardhana
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 10, No 2 (2023): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The phenomenon of producing surrogate mother facilities has been recognized in some countries, although Indonesia indirectly prohibits the practice. The practice is also feared to be a new form of human trafficking. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the opportunities for surrogacy legalization regarding its perspectives between human rights and the loophole of trafficking. In this study, three problems were formulated: (1) the legal status of children born from a surrogate mother; (2) the legality of a surrogate mother in Indonesian law; and (3) the opportunities for surrogacy legalization in legal reform. This study is a normative juridical study that examines the differences in legal systems in various countries regarding the regulation of surrogacy. The children delivered through surrogacy were the legal offspring of surrogate mothers. They were also likely to have a legal relationship with their biological parents as adopted children. Asides from these legal statuses, Indonesian law did not support the validity of the uterine lease agreement. This was due to its inseparability from the influence of religious and cultural values, which opposed the existence of surrogacy. Women and children have the potential to become victims of exploitation, even though the practice of surrogate motherhood is very harmful to their health. The practice subsequently prioritized the opportunity to become a new form of human trafficking. Various international legal instruments that exist can be used as a reference to prohibit the existence of surrogate mothers.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v10n2.a3
Treaties as a Source of National Law in The Perspective of Constitutional Law Efik Yusdiansyah; Wicaksana Dramanda
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 10, No 2 (2023): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia does not regulate the relations and interactions between treaties and national law. The absence of constitutional norms regarding this matter raises the question of how treaties become a source of national law. This study puts forward the perspective of constitutional law to answer how national law perceives treaties in the dimensions of national law. It argues that the constitutional law paradigm views treaties as a product of the legislative and executive interaction within the framework of the theory of separation of powers. Based on this view, the formation of law is the original power of the legislature, which impacts the obligation to provide legislative consent before treaties can be applied to domestic jurisdictions, as well as placing treaties under the 1945 Constitution. Thus, Indonesia can remain selective in enforcing treaties at the domestic level. The 1945 Constitution paradigm indeed influenced Indonesia's closeness to the teachings of dualism. However, this paper also describes that in using treaties, the Constitutional Court often uses treaties that have yet to be ratified as a basis for strengthening arguments in decisions. This practice shows a shift in the paradigm of dualism to a pragmatic monism paradigm.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v10n2.a5

Page 49 of 49 | Total Record : 483

 45   46   47   48   49 

Filter by Year

2014 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 10, No 2 (2023): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 10, No 1 (2023): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 9, No 3 (2022): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 9, No 2 (2022): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 9, No 1 (2022): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 8, No 3 (2021): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 8, No 2 (2021): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 8, No 1 (2021): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 7, No 3 (2020): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 7, No 2 (2020): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 7, No 1 (2020): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 6, No 3 (2019): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 6, No 2 (2019): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 6, No 1 (2019): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 5, No 3 (2018): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 5, No 2 (2018): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 5, No 2 (2018): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 5, No 1 (2018): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 5, No 1 (2018): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 4, No 3 (2017): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 4, No 3 (2017): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 4, No 2 (2017): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 4, No 2 (2017): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 4, No 1 (2017): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 4, No 1 (2017): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 3, No 3 (2016): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 3, No 3 (2016): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 3, No 2 (2016): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 3, No 2 (2016): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 3, No 1 (2016): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 3, No 1 (2016): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 2, No 3 (2015): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 2, No 3 (2015): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 2, No 2 (2015): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 2, No 2 (2015): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 2, No 1 (2015): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 2, No 1 (2015): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 1, No 3 (2014): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 1, No 3 (2014): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 1, No 2 (2014): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 1, No 2 (2014): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 1, No 1 (2014): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 1, No 1 (2014): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) More Issue