Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
2.203
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL FIAT JUSTISIA Sriwijaya Law Review Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Jambura Law Review Gorontalo Law Review Guru Tua : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Tadulako Master Law Journal Amsir Law Jurnal (ALJ) Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu IBLAM Law Review Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Penyuuhan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (JPPM) Mimbar Hukum
Andi Intan Purnamasari
Faculty Of Law, Tadulako University, Indonesia
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Penyuuhan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (JPPM)

 1 
PELATIHAN PENYUSUNAN ARGUMENTASI HUKUM DALAM OPTIMALISASI LEGAL ADVICE PADA BAWASLU Andi Intan Purnamasari; Supriyadi Supriyadi; Nursiah Moh Yunus; Awaliyah Awaliyah
Jurnal Penyuluhan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Vol. 2 No. 3 (2023): JPPM : Jurnal Penyuluhan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jppm.v2i2.481

Abstract

This study focuses on efforts to improve the ability of human resources through the form of training in producing legal argumentation as one of the strengthening skills of Bawaslu members in Donggala district. Legal Argumentation is essentially made to answer certain issues. This issue generally arises from the client. Therefore, a legal argumentation must be made in a focused, systematic, and proportional manner. Legal argumentation usually only consists of 3-5 pages. For this reason, legal argumentation must focus only on the issue in question, not discussing matters outside of it. Legal argumentation must also be systematic so that the description is easy to understand. There is no standard format for a Legal Argumentation, but at least an LO consists of: (1) the case, (2) identifiable and relevant legal basis, (3) legal opinion, and closed with (5) conclusion, which includes suggestions or recommendations.
PEMBUATAN LEGAL OPINION DALAM PENANGANAN PELANGGARAN ADMINISTRASI PEMILU TAHUN 2024 DI BAWASLU Supriyadi Supriyadi; Andi Intan Purnamasari; Sulbadana Sulbadana; Aminuddin Kasim; Nursiah M Yunus; Awaliyah Awaliyah
Jurnal Penyuluhan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Vol. 2 No. 3 (2023): JPPM : Jurnal Penyuluhan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jppm.v2i3.482

Abstract

Since the previous election, the issue of electoral violations has become an inevitable problem. Almost every stage of the elections leaves the issue of violations dealt with by the Bawaslu of Parigi Moutong district, which allows them to make legal analysis and legal opinions. Basically, legal opinions are made to solve a particular problem. Clients often raise this problem. Therefore, a Legal Opinion should be made carefully, orderly, and proportionate. Besides, it has to be systematic in order to be understandable. Although there is no standard format for Legal Opinions, a minimum LO consists of: (1) Fact, (2) Issue, (3) Rules, (4) Application, and (5) Conclusion
Co-Authors Adiesty Septhiany Prihatiningsih Syamsuddin Adiguna Kharismawan Aminuddin Kasim Awaliyah Awaliyah Awaliyah, Awaliyah Darmiati Darmiati Fidyah Faramita Utami Haniyatul Husna binti Md Mohtar Manga Patila Moh.Yunus, Nursiah Muhammad Hatta Roma Nurhayati Mardin Nursiah M Yunus Nurul Miqat Nurul Miqat Rafika Nur Sulbadana Sulbadana Supriyadi Supriyadi Supriyadi Supriyadi Supriyadi Supriyadi Supriyadi Supriyadi Supriyadi Supriyadi Supriyadi Supriyadi Supriyadi Utami, Fidyah Paramita