Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
2.864
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lex Jurnalica (Ilmu Hukum) Unes Law Review Journal of Humanities and Social Studies Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni Jurnal Hukum Adigama Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) Jurnal Yustitia Jurnal Konstitusi International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Literature (IJOMRAL) Jurnal Al-Hakim : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Studi Syariah, Hukum dan Filantropi POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi
Djaja, Benny
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Unes Law Review

 1 
Bagaimana Keberlakuan Hak Waris di Indonesia Immanuel Rich, Johannes; Djaja, Benny
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1527

Abstract

This research investigates the implementation of inheritance rights in Indonesia with a focus on the role of customary law, religious law, and positive law in the distribution of inheritance. The research findings illustrate the complexity of the property inheritance system which is influenced by local norms, traditional traditions and religious values. Although Indonesia has national regulations governing inheritance rights, customary law often dominates the division of property in various regions, creating significant variations. Religious law, especially Islamic law, also plays a key role, although implementation varies across different Muslim communities. This research highlights the problem of gender inequality in the inheritance of property and the complexity of modern family structures as the main factors influencing the implementation of inheritance rights. In addition, the economic impact of inheritance rights is highlighted, with particular attention to property management, fair distribution, and protection of heirs' rights. Policy recommendations include legal reform, increasing public awareness, and empowering women to create a more inclusive and fair inheritance rights system in Indonesia.
Penerapan Prinsip Restoratif Justice terhadap Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Putusan Lepas dari segala Tuntutan Hukum( studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 28/Pid.B/2022/PN.LBB) Immanuel Rich, Johannes; Djaja, Benny
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.1927

Abstract

The application of restorative justice in a criminal case must involve coordination from all levels of law enforcement agencies. Theft is an action that falls into the criminal category where the perpetrator of the theft takes property belonging to another person illegally without the owner's permission. Of course, this act of theft harms one party, namely the victim. At this time, many thefts are found to occur within the environment, not far from those close to the environment itself, it is not uncommon for theft to be carried out by those closest to us. Basically, every person who commits theft must be proven to have fulfilled all the elements of a criminal act as stated in the formulation of Article 362 of the Criminal Code, stealing here is defined as taking something that wholly or partly belongs to another person with the intention of possessing it unlawfully, punishable by a maximum sentence of five years. prison and fine... As for the Problem Formulation: 1. How are the Principles of Restorative Justice Applied to Judges' Considerations in Decisions to Release All Legal Claims (Case Study Decision Number: 28/Pid.B/2022/PN.LBB)? and 2. What are the obstacles in applying the principles of restorative justice to the judge's considerations in making a decision to release all legal claims? The conclusions of this research are: 1. The panel of judges who handled the cases in this research were not guided by the Decree of the Director General of the General Justice Agency Number: 1691/DJU/SK/PS.00/12/2020 concerning guidelines for implementing restorative justice in the General Court environment .The defendant Dedi's case does not meet the requirements for restorative justice as stipulated in National Police Regulation no. 8 of 2021 concerning Handling Criminal Acts Based on Restorative Justice and Attorney General Regulation no. 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution based on Restorative Justice and does not fulfill legal objectives, namely the principles of legal certainty, justice and expediency and conclusion 2. The implementation of the concept of restorative justice in the integrated criminal justice system in Indonesia has not been implemented in an integrated manner with the absence of high-level regulations regarding implementation of restorative justice, including clear technical instructions with the aim of ensuring that the perpetrator truly recovers and is accepted back into society. This is why the criminal justice sub-systems (police, prosecutor's office, judiciary, correctional institutions) in Indonesia do not fully understand what is actually meant by the concept of restorative justice.
Antisipasi Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Berkaitan Dengan Profesi Notaris dan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) Elrika, Elrika; Djaja, Benny
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2044

Abstract

The mode of Money Laundering Crime (TPPU) that often occurs in Indonesia is by utilizing the role of Notary and PPAT in performing their duties. Notaries and Land Deed Officials ("PPAT") become co-suspects in criminal cases, because they are suspected of assisting in the implementation of money laundering crimes, or other criminal acts involving deeds made. The research method used in writing this article is normative juridical research with a research approach using statutory regulations and using a theoretical or conceptual approach. The results of the analysis of the Notary and PPAT in carrying out their duties to anticipate money laundering apply the principle of Recognizing Service Users, if the Notary or PPAT finds suspicious transactions, they can report it to the Financial Transaction Reporting and Analysis Center (PPATK). In addition, Notary and PPAT are not responsible for the criminal act of money laundering committed by the parties or their clients who use the services of Notary or PPAT who require their services based on their authority. The position of the Notary and PPAT in exercising their authority to make authentic deeds is only as a recorder that is poured into a deed that gives rise to legal acts and has perfect evidentiary power. Notaries and PPAT are only obliged to report to PPATK if there are indications of money laundering committed by the parties or their clients through their services as Notaries or PPAT.
Akibat Hukum Terhadap Warisan Yang dialihkan Tanpa Persetujuan Ahli Waris (Studi Putusan Nomor: 107/PDT.G/2019/PN. PLK) Chaterina, Carren; Djaja, Benny
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2048

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji akibat hukum peralihan harta warisan tanpa persetujuan ahli waris, sebagaimana tertuang dalam Putusan Penelitian Nomor: 107/Pdt.G/2019/Pn. Tolong. Didalami juga tanggung jawab Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) dalam tata cara ini, dan sistem pewarisan di Indonesia yang dituangkan dalam Pasal 111 Peraturan Menteri Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 16 Tahun 2021. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji akibat hukum peralihan harta warisan tanpa persetujuan ahli waris, serta kewajiban PPAT (pejabat yang berwenang melakukan peralihan harta) sehubungan dengan akta yang dibuat, dan sistem pewarisan yang berlaku. Penelitian ini diharapkan menambah wawasan mengenai akibat hukum dan tanggung jawab PPAT, serta memberikan pemahaman mengenai sistem pewarisan di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif, mengandalkan bahan hukum sekunder melalui studi kepustakaan dan wawancara. Kesimpulan menunjukkan bahwa pengalihan warisan tanpa persetujuan semua ahli waris adalah tidak sah dan dapat dibatalkan oleh pengadilan, dengan PPAT memiliki tanggung jawab besar untuk memastikan legalitas proses peralihan hak. Saran diberikan agar semua pihak memastikan kepatuhan terhadap prosedur hukum untuk melindungi hak ahli waris dan mencegah sengketa hukum.
Co-Authors Aprilia, Indah Siti Calista , Jessica Calista, Jessica Chaterina, Carren Christine Christine Dwi Dharmayanthi, Ni Nengah Elrika, Elrika Esa Prameswari, Rr. Ayu Gayatri FamdaIe, Grace NataIia H Farma Rahayu, Mella Ismelia Immanuel Rich, Johannes Izzah , Nurul IZZAH, NURUL Kurniawan Kurniawan Pitaloka, Diah Marla Prianto, Yuwono Rachmah, Andriana Rania, Rania Soewito, Rizal Iskandar Sudirman, Maman Traa, I Komang Krisma Bima Winarsih Winarsih Yohanes, Joshua