This Author published in this journals
All Journal Mitra Sains
Djaeng, Maxinus
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PROFIL REGULASI KOGNISI SISWA SMP NEGERI 2 PALU DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF Rudtin, Nur Afrianti; Djaeng, Maxinus; Ismaimuza, Dasa
Mitra Sains Vol 7, No 3 (2019)
Publisher : Tadulako University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (294.746 KB)

Abstract

students of VIII C class of SMP Negeri 2 Palu in solving system of equations in two variables viewed from cognitive style. The research subjects were one student belonged to independent field and another student belonged to dependent field. The grouping for obtaining the desired subjects was done by administering GEFT test. The research results show that: (1) in the planning stage, FI was not easily influenced by his environment so that he could convey the information that he knew and was asked to him and he could also develop the steps for solving problems, (2) in the problem solving stage in order to obtain results, FI executed the solving steps already planned, and checked the correctness of the solving steps by analyzing the conformity to the plan, sometimes the subject asked himself because he felt that probably the problems were not in line with the solving steps to be achieved, (3) in the stage of checking the correctness of the solution, FI firstly asked to himself for he felt that probably there might be something illogical, then he matched them manually in order to confirm the results obtained, and when observing his own ways of work, FI decided that the results he obtained were correct, (4) FD was easily influenced by his environment; thus, in the planning stage, he tried to interact with others first and only then he could convey the information that he knew and was asked to him, and he could develop the problem solving steps, (5) in the problem solving stage, FD executed the solving steps, and checked the correctness of the solving steps by analyzing the conformity to the plan, sometimes the subject asked himself because he felt that probably the solving steps were not in line with the solutions to be achieved, and (6) in the stage of checking the correctness of the solution, FD asked to himself for he felt that the solutions obtained were not in line with the objectives being asked, and when observing his own ways of work, FD remained confident with the results he obtained.
PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DI KELAS XI IPA SMA NEGERI 2 PALU Aziza, Aziza; Djaeng, Maxinus; Amri, Baso
Mitra Sains Vol 6, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Tadulako University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (315.638 KB)

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the effect of learning model and learning motivation on studets? learning achievements in mathematics. This research was conducted at SMAN 2 Palu using a quasi-experimental design with factorial 2 ´ 2. The independent variable in this study is learning model and learning motivation. The dependent variable is the students' mathematics learning achievements. Instruments used in the form of learning motivation questionnaire and achievement test. These samples students of class XI-IPA taken using random sampling techniques. Analysis of data using analysis of variance two-lane. Results showed (1) there is a significant difference the mathematics learning achievements of students between who are taught trough  active learning model and direct learning; (2) there is a significant difference the mathematics learning achievements of students beetween high learning motivation and student learning achievements learning motivation is low; (3) there is an interaction between learning active learning model and learning motivation of students; (4) specifically for low motivation students who are taught by active learning model mathematics learning achievements was higher than students taught with direct learning; (5) specifically for high motivation students who are taught by active learning model mathematics learning achievements was lower than students taught with direct learning; (6) specifically for active learning model students who have high motivation to mathematics learning achievements higher than the students who have low motivation, and (7) specifically for direct learning model students who have high motivation to mathematics learning achievements higher than the students who have low motivation.