Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

LAW NO. 11 OF 2020 ALLOWS LAND ACQUISITION FOR PUBLIC INTEREST IN SUBSIDIZED HOUSING BUSINESSES FOR LOW-INCOME COMMUNITIES Munir, Saiful; Subekti, Subekti; Suyono, Yoyok Ucuk; Widodo, Ernu
EQUALEGUM International Law Journal Volume 2, Issue 2, 2024
Publisher : SYNTIFIC

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background. The development of land acquisition in Indonesia is influenced by various factors including the government system, leadership system, development performance plan, development orientation direction, and legislation enacted. As an important element in the life of living things, land is the surface of the earth that is organized and managed nationally. This research purpose was to analyze the land acquisition for public interests for low-income communities in the subsidized housing business based on law No. 11 of 2020. Research Method. This research uses a type of legal research that is normative in nature (normative legal research), this research leans towards the Law Approach and Conceptual Approach. As well as Legal Materials that researchers use are Sources of legal materials that are primary, tertiary, and secondary commonly used in research with a normative nature. Findings. The state is responsible for protecting the entire Indonesian nation through the organization of housing and settlement areas so that people can live and inhabit decent and affordable homes in a healthy, safe, harmonious, and sustainable environment throughout Indonesia. As one of the basic human needs, ideally, a house should be owned by every family, especially for people with low income and for people who live in densely populated areas in urban areas. Conclusion. To provide adequate, cheap housing for everyone, especially low-income families and those living in highly packed urban areas, the state is responsible for organizing housing and settlement areas and safeguarding Indonesia.
LAW ENFORCEMENT OF CRIMINAL ACTS IN THE MISUSE OF SUBSIDIZED SOLAR OIL IN INDONESIA Putra, Reza Oktriananta Hadyan; Subekti; Suyono, Yoyok Ucuk
Ius Positum: Journal Of Law Theory And Law Enforcement Vol. 2 Issue. 1 (2023)
Publisher : jfpublshier

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56943/jlte.v2i1.266

Abstract

The Oil and Gas Law provides a legal basis for steps to renew and realign Oil and Gas business activities. In accordance with the Oil and Gas Law, Pertamina’s function is a business entity, as an operator, by implementing the applicable laws and regulations. The government has established a government agency which in conducting its functions, duties, and authorities is independent, called the regulatory agency for the supply and distribution of fuel which was formed based on Government Regulation Number 67 of 2002 and Presidential Decree Number 86 of 2002, which referred to Government Regulation. This research aims to improve the supervision of the distribution of subsidized oil. Pertamina has collaborated with the Indonesian National Police through Pertamina Joint Agreement Letter (SKB) andNational Police Headquarters No. Pol. KEP/34/VII/2004 and Number KPTS-035/C00000/2004-S0 concerning on the Security of Kerosene and Diesel Fuel. Based on research result, the law enforcement on criminal act in the misuse of the trading system of subsidized diesel by the Police through investigations and investigations with the conclusion that the fulfillment of the elements of the article referred to in Article 55 of the Oil and Gas Law. Based on the Oil and Gas Law, the subjects are people and business entities. It can be seen in CHAPTER XI regarding criminal provisions.
THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OF REMOVAL CONTENT'S GAS CANISTER CRIMINAL BASED ON DECISION NUMBER: 322/PID.SUS/2020/PN.MLG Wiraputri, Gecilla Vanda; Suyono, Yoyok Ucuk
Ius Positum: Journal Of Law Theory And Law Enforcement Vol. 2 Issue. 2 (2023)
Publisher : jfpublshier

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56943/jlte.v2i2.286

Abstract

The fulfillment of LPG needs for household needs is by selling LPG at an appropriate price set by the government. Unfortunately, many businesses try to make a profit by transmitting the contents of subsidized LPG to non-subsidized LPG which is then sold to consumers at non-subsidized prices. The objective of this research is to understand and analyze the legal liability and law enforcement of Criminal Removal Content's Gas Canister based on Decision Number 322/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Mlg. This research is included in normative legal research. The results indicated that Iwan Agus Susanto and Hendik Dwi Susanto can be held criminally liable because they have fulfilled all the elements of criminal liability. Law enforcement of the perpetrators of criminal gas canister removal committed by defendants Iwan Agus Susanto and Hendik Dwi Susanto in the existence of facts, such as the statements of witnesses and the existence of evidence confiscated with the confession of the defendants, then law enforcement concluded that the actions committed by Iwan Agus Susanto and Hendik Dwi Susanto were proven to have violated Article 53 letter d of Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 22/2001 concerning Oil and Gas jo Article 55 Paragraphs (1) to 1 Criminal Code.
IMPLEMENTATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR DRUG ABUSERS Shalasa, Idham Malik; Subekti; Suyono, Yoyok Ucuk; Prawesthi, Wahyu
Ius Positum: Journal Of Law Theory And Law Enforcement Vol. 2 Issue. 3 (2023)
Publisher : jfpublshier

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56943/jlte.v2i3.360

Abstract

Nowadays, narcotics and drug crimes have been transnational crime that conducted  with sophisticated technology. Then, law enforcement officials are expected to prevent and solve these crimes in order to improve the morality and quality of human resources in Indonesia, especially for the nation’s next generation. Therefore, this research aims to find out the implementation of restorative justice systems for drug abusers in Indonesia. This research is a normative juridical approach. The normative juridical approach is to use legislation, examine all laws and regulations related to the legal issues. The restorative justice approach can only be applied to addicts, abusers, victims of abuse, drug dependence, and one-day narcotics use, as stipulated in Article 1 of Joint Decree of Chief Justice of Supreme Court, Minister of Law and Human Rights, Minister of Health, Minister of Social Affairs, Attorney General, Chief of Police, Head of National Narcotics Agency Number 01/PB/MA/111/2014, No. 03/2014, No. 11/2014, No. 03/2014, Number Per 005/A/JA/03/2014, No. 1/2014, Number Perber/01/111/2014/BNN on Handling Narcotics Addicts and Victims of Narcotics Abuse into Rehabilitation Institutions.
LAW ENFORCEMENT AGAINST PERPETRATORS OF CRIMINAL OFFENSES OF MOTORCYCLE EMBEZZLEMENT UNDER DECISION NO. 85/PID.B/2022/PN KTG Carlos, Christcarsel Brandlay Theolvano; Subekti, Subekti; Borman, M. Syahrul; Suyono, Yoyok Ucuk; Prawesthi, Wahyu
Yuris: Journal of Court and Justice Vol. 2 Issue. 4 (2023)
Publisher : jfpublisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56943/jcj.v2i4.448

Abstract

The development of an advanced era does not eliminate the possibility that the modus operandi of criminal acts is also increasingly developed, both in thought and technology. These developments affect various individuals to do various ways to fulfill their desires by doing everything that has an impact on someone later. The most dominant crime case is the type of crime against property, that is, embezzlement. Crimes reported by the public to Kotamobagu Police continue to increase. One of these crimes is the crime of motorcycle embezzlement. The objective of this research is to find out the law enforcement against the perpetrators of motorcycle embezzlement under Decision No. 85/Pid.B/2022/PN Ktg. This research uses a case approach to examine the application of legal norms committed in legal practice, especially regarding cases that have been decided, and a statutory approach by examining all laws and regulations related to the legal issues being addressed. Based on the research results, in this case, the suspect will be charged with the criminal offense of motorcycle embezzlement as referred to in Article 372 of the Criminal Code with a maximum imprisonment of four years. In addition, the crime of embezzlement is a criminal offense that cannot be avoided.
LAW ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS OF ZTE WI-FI ROUTER THIEVERY Amsori, Rachmad; Subekti; Suyono, Yoyok Ucuk
Srawung: Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanities Vol. 2 Issue. 1 (2023)
Publisher : jfpublshier

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56943/jssh.v2i1.267

Abstract

The crime of theft is regulated in Book II, Chapter XXII of Law Number 1 of 1946 concerning on the Criminal Code (KUHP) Articles 362 to Article 367. In this Chapter, five types of theft are regulated, such as Ordinary theft (Article 362) Criminal Code, Theft with weight (Article 363) of the Criminal Code, Minor theft (Article 364) of the Criminal Code, Theft with violence (Article 365) of the Criminal Code, and Theft in the family (Article 367) of the Criminal Code. The type of research used in this research is sociological or empirical legal research since, in this case, the researcher directly observes what is happening in society. Based on the research result, Surabaya District Court, which conducts criminal investigations and trials, has decided in the defendant's case, sentencing the Perpetrator of Theft of Zte Wi-FiRouter Based on Decision Number 2011/Pid.B/2022/PN Sby. According to panel of judges, the punishment imposed on the defendant as stated in the court decision has been deemed as appropriate and fair, both from the defendant's interests, society's interests, and the implementation of the law generally, that punishment is used as a last resort and not as an attempt to exact revenge for the perpetrator act.