Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

EVALUASI SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY PADA FASILITAS PUBLIK STUDI KASUS: RPTRA BAHARI, GANDARIA SELATAN Permanasari, Eka; Mochtar, Sahid; Purisari, Rahma
LANGKAU BETANG: JURNAL ARSITEKTUR Vol 7, No 2 (2020): October
Publisher : Department of Architecture, Universitas Tanjungpura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26418/lantang.v7i2.40745

Abstract

Upaya membantu masyarakat dalam memiliki ruang terbuka untuk berinteraksi dan berkegiatan di ruang kota seringkali mengarah pada pembangunan fisik dalam bentuk infrastruktur yang hanya mengakomodasi agenda pemerintah. Akibatnya, pengembangan ini lebih cenderung kepada bentukan fisik dan melupakan siapa penggunanya. Meskipun fasilitas dan infrastruktur ini dibuat untuk memenuhi kebutuhan masyarakat, seringkali setelah bangunan fisik terbangun, keberkelanjutan kegiatan tidak terjadi disana. Tidak adanya partisipasi masyarakat dalam proses desain adalah salah satu penyebab kurangnya rasa memiliki terhadap fasilitas yang ada. Penelitian ini mengevaluasi keberlanjutan sosial Ruang Publik Terpadu Ramah Anak-RPTRA Bahari, Gandaria Selatan, Jakarta, melalui pengukuran terhadap rasa memiliki masyarakat sekitar. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif untuk mengetahui seberapa besar rasa memiliki masyarakat terhadap fasilitas publik di lingkungan mereka. Hasilnya menunjukkan variasi tingkat rasa memiliki atas fasilitas tersebut namun sebagian besar masyarakat merasakan kemanfaatannya. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa secara sosial, RPTRA Gandaria dinilai “sustainable” karena masyarakat tidak hanya mengenal RPTRA, tetapi memanfaatkan sekaligus turut terlibat dalam menjaga kelangsungannya di masa depan. EVALUATING SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY IN PUBLIC FACILITIES CASE STUDY: RPTRA BAHARI, GANDARIA SELATANEfforts to help people have open spaces for interaction and activities in urban area often lead to physical development in infrastructure that only accommodates the government agenda. As a result, this development prefers physical form and forgets who the user will be. Although these facilities and infrastructure are made to meet the needs of the community, often after the physical building is built, there is no sustainable activity taking place there. The exclusion of community participation in the design process is one of the causes of the lack of sense of belonging to the facilities built. This paper evaluates the social sustainability of the Bahari Child-Friendly Public Space (Ruang Publik Terpadu Ramah Anak-RPTRA) in South Gandaria, Jakarta, through measuring the sense of belonging of the surrounding community. This study uses quantitative methods to determine how much the community sense of belonging to public facilities in their environment. The results show a variety of sense of belonging level, and most of the community feel the benefits of the RPTRA facility. It can be concluded that the RPTRA Gandaria is socially “sustainable” because the community is not only familiar with the building but also utilizes and is involved in maintain its sustainability in the future.
Developing Community’s Sense of Belonging in Building Bahari Community Center (RPTRA) in South Jakarta Eka Permanasari; Sahid Sahid; Rahma Purisari
International Journal of Built Environment and Scientific Research Vol 3, No 2 (2019): International Journal of Built Environment and Scientific Research
Publisher : Department of Architecture Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (273.144 KB) | DOI: 10.24853/ijbesr.3.2.63-70

Abstract

Capital city is full of layered memories from the authority in representing power and identity and from   the everyday uses of place. Public space often represents and legitimates power. The use of top down approach in design is imminent and authority uses architecture and urban design as their means of showing identity. However, good urban design approach should include public participation in the process, allowing the users to take in charge and contribute to the decision making. A good city should be designed based on common good for all. The bottom-up approach uses the participative design method to allow citizen to speak, be heard and take in charge. It ensures the sustainable activity as community would be involved in using the place and preserving the resources. Everyone contributes to the city as citizen members of political community.  As the result, community would have sense of belonging and engagement towards the public space.  This research documented and analysis this participative design approach during the development of Jakarta community center (RPTRA) in South Gandaria. As one of the pilot projects, Bahari community center was one of the successful projects that included community participation during the design and implementation process. Through observation, interview and series of discussion, authors were engaged in this action research of implementing bottom up approach in designing public space.
How Well Can Architecture Students Comprehend the Site as Design Context without Performing On-site Observation? Aldyfra Luhulima Lukman; Sahid Sahid
International Journal of Built Environment and Scientific Research Vol 5, No 2 (2021): International Journal of Built Environment and Scientific Research
Publisher : Department of Architecture Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24853/ijbesr.5.2.63-74

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has forced daily activities, including educational activities, to prevent or minimize the transmission or spread of the disease caused by a coronavirus. Online architecture education demands significant adjustments in the embedded learning methods, especially those that entail architecture design studio. An architecture design studio that commonly involves direct interaction in physical spaces should be performed through online media and computer screens. Architecture students' comprehension of site or design contexts is usually formed by collecting information through on-site observation.  In an online architecture design studio, an on-site survey is replaced by observing visual representation of the site. This study aims to identify how well architecture students in architecture design studios can comprehend the site when they have to rely on data acquired from virtual observation and/or on secondary data and how beneficial the comprehension to their design process is. Students' understanding of the site was measured with thirteen attributes of the site. It can be concluded that when architecture students depend on mere audio and/or visual data collected from the internet and/or other people, without visiting the site, they tend to have partial comprehension regarding the site as context. Contextual and responsive design demands a comprehensive understanding of all attributes of the site. The architecture design studio should incorporate on-site observation concerning the site according to the health protocol, so that the architecture students involved in the studio can have a better understanding of the site and create more contextual and responsive designs
DIAGNOSIS OF LEARNING DIFFICULTIES IN MATHEMATICS (GEOMETRY) FOR STUDENTS GRADE X AT SMK NEGERI 3 YOGYAKARTA Shella Azizah; Sahid .
Jurnal Pedagogi Matematika Vol 6, No 1 (2017): Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/jpm.v6i1.5970

Abstract

The  objectives  of  this  research  are  to  describe  the  difficulties  of  students  and  their  causes  in solving geometry problems. The difficulties were observed related to the concept and principles.This  research  is  a  qualitative  research  with  case  study  strategy.  Subjects  of  this  research  are seven students of class X KR 1 and X TP 2 at SMK Negeri 3 Yogyakarta whom diagnosed have learning difficulties in solving geometry problems. Qualitative data were collected by test and interviews. The data were analyzed descriptively qualitative.The results show the concept of geometry that has not understood by students are the concept of solid geometry (cubes and rectangular prism), right triangle, the projection (the point on the line, the point on the plane, and the line on the plane), perpendicular concept (two lines, lines and plane), distance (point to  the  line,  point  to  the  plane  and  two  parallel  planes),  and  angle  (lines  and  plane,  two  planes). Meanwhile, the principle of which is not mastered by students are the principle of projection, distance calculations,  the  Pythagorean  theorem,  calculation  of  the  root,  the  calculation  of  the  angle  and trigonometry  comparison.  The  cause  of  the  learning  difficulties  by  students  is  students  do  not  have awareness to learn regularly.
PENGEMBANGAN LKS BERBASIS PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI PROGRAM LINIER UNTUK SMK KELAS X Ibrohim Aji Kusuma; Sahid .
Jurnal Pedagogi Matematika Vol 5, No 8 (2016): Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/jpm.v5i8.4608

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan LKS berbasis pendekatan saintifik pada materi program linier untuk siswa SMK Kelas X. Penelitian ini juga bertujuan untuk mengetahui kualitas LKS yang dikembangkan ditinjau dari tiga aspek kualitas yaitu kevalidan, kepraktisan, and keefektifan. Pengembangan LKS mengacu pada model pengembangan ADDIE yang terdiri dari lima tahap yaitu analysis (analisis), design (perancangan), development (pengembangan), implementation (implementasi), and evaluation (evaluasi). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kualitas LKS ditinjau dari aspek kevalidan memperoleh kriteria valid. Hal tersebut terlihat dari perolehan rata-rata skor penilaian ahli materi sebesar 3,76 dengan kategori baik, perolehan rata-rata skor penilaian ahli media sebesar 4 dengan kategori baik, and perolehan rata-rata skor penilaian guru matematika sebesar 4,2 dengan kategori sangat baik. Kualitas LKS ditinjau dari aspek kepraktisan memperoleh kriteria praktis. Hal tersebut terlihat dari perolehan rata-rata skor angket respon siswa sebesar 2,92 dengan kategori baik, perolehan rata-rata skor angket respon guru sebesar 3,1 dengan kategori baik. Selain itu, kualitas LKS ditinjau dari aspek keefektifan memperoleh kriteria efektif. Hal tersebut terlihat dari perolehan rata-rata tes hasil belajar siswa sebesar 81,19 and persentase ketuntasan peserta didik sebesar 70,96%.  Kata kunci: LKS, pendekatan saintifik, program linier
EFEKTIVITAS MEDIA DALAM PEMBELAJARAN GUIDED DISCOVERY DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH DAN SIKAP Defy Kusumaningrum; Sahid .
Jurnal Pedagogi Matematika Vol 6, No 7 (2017): Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/jpm.v6i7.7863

Abstract

Penelitian quasi experiment ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan keefektifan pembelajaranbangun ruang sisi datar dengan pendekatan guided discovery antara yang berbantuan GeoGebra danyang berbantuan alat peraga dengan desain penelitian pretest-posttest group design. Populasipenelitian adalah seluruh siswa kelas VIII SMPN 1 Muntilan tahun pelajaran 2016/2017, sedangkansampel penelitian sebanyak 2 kelas yaitu kelas VIIIA dan VIIIC. Instrumen penelitian ini adalahinstrumen tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah, angket sikap terhadap matematika, dan lembarobservasi keterlaksanaan pembelajaran. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembelajaranberbantuan GeoGebra efektif ditinjau dari kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan sikap terhadapmatematika, sedangkan pembelajaran berbantuan alat peraga tidak efektif ditinjau dari kemampuanpemecahan masalah tetapi efektif ditinjau dari sikap terhadap matematika.Kata kunci: GeoGebra, alat peraga, guided discovery
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MATHEMATICAL LEARNING IN LOGIC COMPETENCY WITH PROBLEM BASED LEARNING THROUGH THE COOPERATIVE MODEL OF TYPE THINK-PAIR-SHARE IN TERM OF STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT AND STUDENT CONFIDENCE OF GRADE X SMA NEGERI 1 DEPOK Indri Aryanti; Sahid .
Jurnal Pedagogi Matematika Vol 6, No 1 (2017): Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/jpm.v6i1.5968

Abstract

The  purpose  of  this  research  were  to  describe  the  effectiveness  of  mathematical  learning  in  logic competency with problem based learning through the cooperative model of type think pair share (TPS) in term of student achievement  and student confidence. This research used quasi-exsperimental with pre-test and post-test control group design. Its population was all students of grade X SMA Negeri 1 Depok. The samples  were  class  XD  as  experiment  class  which  given  problem based  learning  through  the  cooperative model  of  type  TPS  and  class  XB  as  control  class  whivh  given  conventional  learning  approach.  The instruments used in this research were learning instrument, i.e. lesson plan and student worksheet, pre-test and  post-test  as  test  instrument  to  measure  student  achievement,  observation  sheets  and  questionnaire confidence  as  non-test  instrument.  The  hypotheses  testing  used  were  one  sample  t-test  and  independent sample t-test. The results indicated that: (1) mathematics learning with problem based learning through the cooperative  model  of  TPS was  effective in terms  of  student  achievement,  (2)  mathematics  learning  with conventional learning approach was effective in terms of student achievement, (3) mathematics learning with problem  based  learning  through  the  cooperative  model  of  TPS  was  not  effective  in  terms  of  student confidence, (4)  )  mathematics learning  with conventional learning  approach  was  not effective  in terms  of student  confidence,  and  (5)  mathematics  learning  with problem  based  learning  through  the  cooperative model  of TPS  was  not  more  effective than  mathematics learning  with conventional  learning  approach in terms of student achievement.