Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
2.127
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang Syntax Idea Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Darma Agung Randwick International of Social Science Journal Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Nusantara Berajah Journal Britain International of Humanities and Social Sciences (BIoHS) Journal Journal of Scientific Research, Education, and Technology
Manotar Tampubolon
Faculty Of Law, Universitas Kristen Indonesia
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Automotive Engineering Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang

 1 
Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Inggris Dengan Jerman (Refleksi Terhadap Sumber Hukum Dan Penerapan Hukum Indonesia) Manotar Tampubolon; Putu George Matthew Simbolon
Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang Vol 5, No 2 (2022): Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33474/yur.v5i2.11114

Abstract

This article explains the differences and similarities between the British legal system and German Law and reflects their application to Indonesian law which was influenced by the swift flow of legalism. The writing uses a normative juridical method with a comparative law approach. Authors use English common law sources along with their application and German civil law along with their application under the stuffenbau theory. The difference between these legal systems is the common law system prioritizes precedent application, while the civil law system prioritizes statutes. Furthermore, these systems also have similarities whereas both systems are applying customs, doctrines, and legal interpretations as to their complementary legal instruments. The authors address that Indonesia needs to apply methods beyond the statute approach, and Indonesia shall take into account customs, doctrines, and interpretations to achieve justice.
Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Inggris Dengan Jerman (Refleksi Terhadap Sumber Hukum Dan Penerapan Hukum Indonesia) Manotar Tampubolon; Putu George Matthew Simbolon
Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang Vol 5 No 2 (2022): Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33474/yur.v5i2.11114

Abstract

This article explains the differences and similarities between the British legal system and German Law and reflects their application to Indonesian law which was influenced by the swift flow of legalism. The writing uses a normative juridical method with a comparative law approach. Authors use English common law sources along with their application and German civil law along with their application under the stuffenbau theory. The difference between these legal systems is the common law system prioritizes precedent application, while the civil law system prioritizes statutes. Furthermore, these systems also have similarities whereas both systems are applying customs, doctrines, and legal interpretations as to their complementary legal instruments. The authors address that Indonesia needs to apply methods beyond the statute approach, and Indonesia shall take into account customs, doctrines, and interpretations to achieve justice.
Co-Authors Adiwijaya Bernadetha Nadeak Bibit Samad Rianto CHONTINA SIAHAAN Daniel Yusmic P Foekh Djoys Anneke Rantung Herri Bona Saut Simatupang John Pieries John Pieris Kezia Adeline Suraninta Br Sinuhaji Ktut Silvanita Mesta Limbong Mompang L. Panggabean Muhammad Abdullah Nahria Nahria Patar Tampubolon Putu George Matthew Simbolon Woro Wahyuningtyas Zaneera Malik