Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
2.083
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah STUDIA ISLAMIKA Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam Heritage of Nusantara: International Journal of Religious Literature and Heritage Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Hayula: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Islamic Studies Dinamisia: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Community Empowerment Muqoddima: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Riset Sosiologi Mozaic : Islam Nusantara
Fariz Alnizar
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : STUDIA ISLAMIKA

 1 
Pretext for Religious Violence in Indonesia: An Anthropolinguistic Analysis of Fatwas on Ahmadiyya Fariz Alnizar
Studia Islamika Vol 26, No 3 (2019): Studia Islamika
Publisher : Center for Study of Islam and Society (PPIM) Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (589.261 KB) | DOI: 10.36712/sdi.v26i3.8719

Abstract

This study uses an anthropolinguistic approach to examine two Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) fatwa texts regarding Ahmadiyya. First, it shows that there are significant differences between the 1980 and 2005 fatwas. Second, in terms of their lexicon, the 1980 fatwa uses the phrase "di luar Islam" (outside Islam), while the 2005 fatwa uses the phrase "berada di luar Islam" (located outside Islam). Third, there is an emphasis on the responsibilities of the government within the 2005 fatwa on Ahmadiyya. Fourth, the 1980 fatwa was directed at the Qadiyan Ahmadiyya, while the 2005 fatwa was directed at all elements of Ahmadiyya. Fifth, the form of the 2005 fatwa is reminiscent of a legal proclamation. This strongly affected the violence experienced by Ahmadiyya, as the fatwa was no longer presented as an opinion, but as a legally binding decision.
Following the Global Rejection: The Motives of Majelis Ulama Indonesia's Fatwas on Ahmadiyah Fariz Alnizar; Fadlil Munawwar Manshur; Amir Ma'ruf
Studia Islamika Vol 29, No 3 (2022): Studia Islamika
Publisher : Center for Study of Islam and Society (PPIM) Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36712/sdi.v29i3.15349

Abstract

This article examines the motives behind the decisions of the Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI), in 1980 and 2005, to issue fatwas condemning the Ahmadiyah. Using critical discourse analysis, this study reveals MUI’s motives behind its fatwas on the Ahmadiyah by drawing on the text and the context of the issuance of the fatwas. Underpinning MUI’s issuance of its fatwa on the Ahmadiyah Qadiyan in 1980 was the global rejection of the Ahmadiyah, particularly in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. Meanwhile, MUI’s fatwa on the Ahmadiyah in 2005 was informed by an increased rejection of the Ahmadiyah in Indonesia, which was based on the Jalsa Salana Ahmadiyah meeting in 2005, in Parung, Bogor. In the fatwa’s dictum, MUI positions itself as the guardian of the Islamic creed. MUI’s choice of wording and language style in its fatwas demonstrates its desire to display its authority as a quasi-non-governmental organization.
Co-Authors Achmad Munjid Ahmad Suaedy Amir Ma'ruf Amir Ma'ruf Dwi Winarno Fadlil Munawwar Manshur Fariz Alnizar Juri Ardiantoro Ma?ruf, Amir Muhammad Nurul Huda Nadiah Nurli Fadilah Nadiah Nurli Fadilah Said Aqil Siroj Vika Vika Nurul Mufidah