Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

p-Index From 2019 - 2024

2.589

P-Index

This Author published in this journals

All Journal Ejurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA) WAPFI (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika) Tadris: Jurnal keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika JIPFRI (Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika dan Riset Ilmiah) JPPPF (Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika) SPEKTRA: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Sains INKUIRI : Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education KONSTAN - JURNAL FISIKA DAN PENDIDIKAN FISIKA JPF : JURNAL PENDIDIKAN FISIKA

Muslim Muslim

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Author-ID : 2478311

Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Astronomy Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Education Energy Environmental Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 17 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

1 2

Pengembangan Instrumen Skala Berpikir Reflektif untuk Mengukur Level Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Mahasiswa Calon Guru Fisika Arini Rosa Sinensis; Harry Firman; Ida Hamidah; Muslim Muslim
JIPFRI (Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika dan Riset Ilmiah) Vol 3 No 2 (2019): JIPFRI (Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika dan Riset Ilmiah) - November 2019
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika STKIP Nurul Huda

The purpose of this study is to develop a reflective thinking scale instrument to measure the level of reflective thinking ability of prospective physics students. This research method used the DDR (Design Development Research) method with the Tools and Research model. The reflective thinking scale developed is a modification of the Reflective Thinking Kember which consists of 24 items each consisting of 6 definitions. The level of Kember reflective thinking namely; 1) Habitual Actions, 2) Understanding, 3) Reflective, 4) Critical Reflective. The research sample was 138 prospective physics teacher students who had taken thermodynamics courses. Data analysis techniques in this study used the CVR (Content Validity Ratio) for content validation analysis, Product Moment Correlation (construct validity test), Cronbach alpha (Reliability) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis to find a model match. The results show that the instrument is valid, reliable and the Goodness of Fit index. It is therefore denied that the instruments developed are valid, reliable and suitable for measuring the level of reflective thinking ability..

Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Argumentasi Dialogis dalam Pembelajaran Fisika untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa SMA Muslim Muslim
Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika Vol 1 No 2 (2015): JPPPF - Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, Volume 1 Nomor 2, Des
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Negeri Jakarta, LPPM Universitas Negeri Jakarta, HFI Jakarta, HFI

Abstract Low ability of scientific arguments related to the students' learning process in the physics classroom that has not habituate scientific argumentation ability. This study aimed to examine the effect of the implementation of arguments dialogical learning model to increase students' ability of scientific argumentation. Argumentation dialogical learning model consists of five phases of learning, namely stages: (1) identification of the problem; (2) group argument discussion; (3) classroom argument discussion; (4) class mediation; and (5) the integration of knowledge. Each stage involves students learning activities directly in order to develop the ability of scientific argumentation. The pre-experimental method with the one group pretest and posttest design used in this research. The essay ability of the scientific arguments test and observation sheet used as a research instruments. Subjects in this study were students of 10th grade in one of the state senior high schools in Bandung, which is determined by random cluster sampling technique. The results show there is an increase in the ability of the student to the acquisition of scientific arguments with medium category after argument dialogical learning model implemented and it was concluded that the implementation of arguments dialogical learning model increased the studentsâ€™ ability of scientific argumentation. Keywords: argument dialogic learning model, scientific argumentation ability Abstrak Rendahnya kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa terkait proses pembelajaran fisika di kelas yang belum melatihkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah. Penelitian ini bertujuan melihat pengaruh implementasi model pembelajaran argumentasi dialogis terhadap kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa. Model pembelajaran argumentasi dialogis terdiri dari lima tahap pembelajaran, yaitu: (1) identifikasi masalah; (2) diskusi argumentasi kelompok; (3) diskusi argumentasi kelas; (4) mediasi kelas; dan (5) integrasi pengetahuan. Setiap tahapan melibatkan secara langsung aktivitas siswa untuk berlatih mengembangkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pre-experiment dengan desain penelitian one group pretest and posttest. Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan meliputi tes kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah berbentuk uraian dan lembar observasi. Subyek dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas X pada salah satu SMA Negeri di Kota Bandung yang ditentukan dengan teknik cluster random sampling. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan peningkatan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa dengan kategori sedang setelah diimplementasikan model pembelajaran argumentasi dialogis, sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa implementasi model pembelajaran argumentasi dialogis berpengaruh terhadap kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa. Kata-kata kunci: model pembelajaran argumentasi dialogis, kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah

The Use of Scientific Writing Heuristics (SWH) to Build Rebuttal Abilities in Scientific Argumentation Anisa Anisa; Ari Widodo; Riandi Riandi; Muslim Muslim
Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Vol 8, No 2 (2019): December 2019
Publisher : Tadris Biologi Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan IAIN SYEKH NURJATI CIREBON

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24235/sc.educatia.v8i2.5131

The research aims to build and measure students' abilities in rebuttal using the Scientific Writing Heuristic (SWH) approach. This mixed-method research method was carried out for 5 months on 38 students, at a high school in West Java, Indonesia. The issue of socio-scientific genetics is given the theme of Genetic Modified Organisms with rebuttal measurements using the updated Toulmin argumentation framework. Qualitative and quantitative data are taken in this article in the form of argumentation before, during, and after treatment; coupled with deep interviews and questionnaires as well as observation of discussions. The results showed there were changes and improvements in rebuttal ability by 27.15% (30 students). The distribution of the strength of evidence is at most level 2 at 48.7% with a weak category, at level 3 at 30.8% with a strong enough category, at level 4 at 20.5% with a strong category.

Karakteristik Tes Hasil Belajar Ranah Kognitif Materi Elastisitas Menggunakan Analisis Item Response Theory Muhammad Lukman Hakim; Muslim Muslim; Taufik Ramlan Ramalis
Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika Vol 10, No 1 (2019): April 2019
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26877/jp2f.v10i1.3318

ABSTRAK Tujuan penelitian ini secara umum yaitu mengetahui karakteristik tes hasil belajar ranah kognitif materi elastisitas. Penelitian deskriptif dengan desain one-shot design digunakan di dua sekolah menengah atas di Bandung. Partisipan ditentukan menggunakan teknik purposive sampling sehingga 116 siswa yang telah mempelajari materi elastisitas dipilih sebagai partisipan dalam penelitian. Partisipan diberi tes hasil belajar ranah kognitif materi elastisitas yang berjumlah 25 butir soal berbentuk pilihan ganda yang telah divalidasi oleh ahli. Tes tersebut dibuat berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom revisi dengan proses kognitif yaitu mengingat, memahami, mengaplikasikan, menganalisis, mengevaluasi dan mencipta. Jawaban siswa kemudian dianalisis menggunakan item response theory. Hasil yang didapatkan dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa validitas tes yang diukur menggunakan indeks Aiken V secara keseluruhan memiliki kategori tinggi, baik secara materi, kontruksi maupun bahasa. Hasil analisis menggunakan item response theory menunjukkan bahwa tes reliabel jika diberikan pada siswa dengan rentang kemampuan sedang sampai kemampuan tinggi. Secara keseluruhan, tes berkategori baik karena memiliki nilai daya pembeda berada pada rentang 0 sampai 2, nilai tingkat kesukaran berada pada rentang -2 sampai 2, dan faktor tebakan semu tidak melebihi nilai 1/k yaitu 0,2.Kata-kata kunci: Tes Hasil Belajar Ranah Kognitif, Item Response Theory, Elastisitas.

VALIDITAS TES KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KREATIF MATERI TEKANAN ZAT DENGAN ANALISIS RASCH MODEL Nurul Yuliadinda; Muslim Muslim; Ridwan Efendi
KONSTAN - JURNAL FISIKA DAN PENDIDIKAN FISIKA Vol 4 No 2 (2019): KONSTAN (Jurnal Fisika dan Pendidikan Fisika)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Mataram

Creative thinking skills is one of the high-level thinking skills that must be possessed by students in learning. However, to determine the students' creative thinking skills necessary measurement tools in the form of tests. Therefore, studies were conducted in order to determine the content validation and construct validation tests of creative thinking skills with Rasch analysis models. This research uses descriptive quantitative method using the design construction and validation. The construction process generates six test items that measure creative thinking skills aspects of fluency, flexibility and originality in the form of an essay. The validation process is based on the judgment of five experts and tests on 190 samples. The results of the validity of the content item has a high and very high categories.

ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN ARGUMENTASI SISWA SMP PADA MATERI PENCEMARAN LINGKUNGAN Dwi Siti Hartinah Eny Ambarawati; Muslim Muslim; Hernani Hernani
INKUIRI: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Vol 10, No 1 (2021): INKUIRI: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA
Publisher : Magister Pendidikan Sains Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/inkuiri.v10i1.29780

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kemampuan argumentasi siswa SMP terkait materi pencemaran lingkungan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Penelitian dilaksanakan di salah satu SMP yang berlokasi di Lembang, Kabupaten Bandung Barat pada 29 orang siswa kelas VII sebagai sampel yang telah dipilih menggunakan teknik random sampling. Instrumen penelitian yaitu tes berbentuk uraian (essay) sebanyak 6 butir soal yang disusun berdasarkan indikator kemampuan argumentasi (claim, data, warrant, backing). Instrumen yang digunakan divalidasi oleh tiga validator yaitu dua dosen ahli dan satu guru bidang studi IPA. Jawaban siswa dianalisis berdasarkan komponen argumentasi yang terkandung didalamnya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa 93,10% siswa menuliskan claim, 54,02% siswa menuliskan data, 48,85% siswa menuliskan warrant, dan 45,40% siswa dapat menuliskan backing. Secara keseluruhan dapat disimpulkan bahwa sebagian besar siswa mampu menuliskan claim namun mulai mengalami kesulitan untuk mengemukakan data, warrant, dan backing. Persentase kemampuan awal siswa dalam berargumentasi tersebut dapat dijadikan sebagai acuan bagi guru sehingga kedepannya dapat menentukan desain atau kegiatan pembelajaran yang tidak hanya berfokus pada pemahaman konsep tetapi juga dapat membangun atau melatih kemampuan argumentasi siswa.This study aims to determine the argumentation ability of junior high school students related to environmental pollution. This study uses a descriptive research method with a quantitative approach. The research was carried out in one of the junior high schools located in Lembang, West Bandung Regency on 29 seventh grade students as a sample that had been selected using random sampling technique. The research instrument is a test in the form of a description (essay) of 6 questions which are arranged based on indicators of argumentation ability (claim, data, warrant, backing). The instrument used was validated by three validators, namely two expert lecturers and one science teacher. Students' answers were analyzed based on the argumentative components contained therein. The results showed that 93.10% of students wrote claims, 54.02% of students wrote down data, 48.85% of students wrote warrants, and 45.40% of students could write backings. Overall, it can be concluded that most of the students are able to write claims but are starting to have difficulty presenting data, warrants, and backings. The percentage of students' initial ability to argue can be used as a reference for teachers so that in the future they can determine designs or learning activities that not only focus on understanding concepts but can also build or train students' argumentation skills

Karakterisasi Instrumen Tes Keterampilan Bepikir Kreatif Berdasarkan Analisis Partial Credit Model Ahmad Zulkarnain Zain; Taufik Ramlan Ramalis; Muslim Muslim
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Vol 6, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20527/jipf.v6i1.4806

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengonstruksi dan mengarakterisasi instrumen tes Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif (KBK) menggunakan Teori Respon Butir (TRB) yakni dengan Partial Credit Model (PCM). Metode yang digunakan adalah mixed method menggunakan exploratory sequential design. Pada proses konstruksi dihasilkan instrumen tes uraian yang mengukur aspek fluency, flexibility, originality dan elaboration. Hasil validasi isi menunjukkan 83,3% soal dikatakan sangat valid dan 16,7% valid. Hasil analisis dengan PCM menunjukkan bahwa seluruh butir soal valid. Pada uji reliabilitas, instrumen tes KBK memiliki nilai puncak fungsi informasi sebesar 6,7938 dan SEM (Standard Error of Measurement) sebesar 0,3837 dengan perpotongan antara kurva menunjukkan instrumen bersifat reliabel. Dari hasil analisis tingkat kesukaran diperoleh butir soal 1-6 memiliki rentang kesulitan mudah-sedang. Seluruh butir soal memiliki nilai daya beda 1 yang artinya dalam kategori baik sekali. Berdasarkan hasil validasi ahli dan karakteristik tes, seluruh butir soal dalam instrumen tes layak digunakan. Instrumen Tes KBK dalam penelitian ini diharapkan dapat digunakan untuk mengukur keterampilan berpikir kreatif dalam materi alat optik untuk siswa SMA. This research aims to construct and characterize the Creative Thinking test instrument using Item Response Theory, namely the Partial Credit Model (PCM). The method used is a mixed-method using an exploratory sequential design. In the construction process, a description test instrument is produced that measures the aspects of fluency, flexibility, originality and elaboration. The results of content validation show that 83.3% of the questions are said to be very valid, and 16.7% are valid. The results of the analysis with PCM show that all items are valid. In the reliability test, the KBK test instrument has a peak value of the information function of 6.7938 and SEM (Standard Error of Measurement) of 0.3837 with the intersection between the two curves in the range -1.8 to 1.3 so that the question is reliable. From the analysis results of the level of difficulty, items 1-6 have an easy-medium difficulty range. All items have a different power value of 1 which means they are in the very good category. Based on the results of expert validation and test characteristics, all items in the test instrument are suitable for use.

Analysis of the Characteristics of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Test on Momentum and Impulse for Senior High School Student Using Item Response Theory Aulia Rahman; Heni Rusnayati; Muslim Muslim
Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA) Vol. 11 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jpfa.v11n2.p127-137

Currently, 21st-century skills are needed by students, especially Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS), to meet the needs of the rapidly growing world of work. It is necessary to provide debriefing during learning activities to meet these needs. Besides that, a quality instrument is needed to measure the skills of each student, the more information that the instrument can provide shows that the instrument is getting better. This study aimed to determine the characteristics of the Higher Order Thinking Skills test on momentum and impulse consisting of validity, reliability, difficulty level, and discrimination index based on item response theory analysis. The method used in this research is a descriptive method with a quantitative approach and a One-Shot Design research design. The population was second-year senior high school students in Bandung. Meanwhile, the sample of this study consisted of 122 second-year senior high school students who were selected using a purposive sampling technique. The instrument used was the Higher Order Thinking Skills test on momentum and impulse. Based on the result, 16 items were categorized as valid. Besides, the reliability of the test instrument was good. For the level of difficulty, an item was categorized as very difficult, an item was difficult, twelve items were medium, three items were easy, and an item was very easy. Lastly, for the discrimination index, thirteen items were considered good, and five items did not classify as good.

Penelusuran Peringkat Kesulitan Materi dalam Fisika Dasar Nurjannah Nurjannah; Agus Setiawan; Dadi Rusdiana; Muslim Muslim
JPFT (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako Online) Vol 8, No 1 (2020): E-Jurnal Pend. Fisika Tadulako
Publisher : Universitas Tadulako

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (164.061 KB)

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendiagnosa kesulitan materi mahasiswa calon guru dalam Fisika Dasar. Penelitian ini termasuk jenis penelitian survei. Kuisioner terdiri dari dua pertanyaan kualitatif yang digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data dalam penelitian ini. Kuisioner diberikan pada 110 orang mahasiswa calon guru yang telah memprogramkan mata kuliah Fisika Dasar. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan bahwa persentase mahasiswa yang berpikir bahwa materi mekanika fluida adalah materi yang paling sulit lebih tinggi dibanding materi-materi lainnya. Alasan mengapa mahasiswa calon guru merasa sulit untuk memahaminya telah dibagi dalam empat kategori meliputi faktor konten, mahasiswa, dosen dan proses pembelajaran.

PISA 2021 Creative Thinking Instrument for Students: Physics Teachers’ Perceptions Nur Endah Susilowati; Muslim Muslim; Ridwan Efendi; Achmad Samsudin
Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 2 (2022): Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Creative thinking, as one of the 21st century skills, is an ability that must be mastered by individuals, especially in this ever-changing era. Therefore, the demands of teachers are not only limited to training them in learning, but also knowing the profile of students’ creative thinking abilities is also considered very important. The purpose of this study was to describe teachers’ perceptions and interests about the need for creative thinking instruments with the PISA 2021 framework. A total of 30 physics teachers who teach in various provinces in Indonesia were involved as respondents in this study. Respondents are high school physics teachers with characteristics aged 20-40 years, 19 are female, and 11 are male. Based on the results of the analysis, it is known that more than 90% of respondents stated that it is very important to measure students’ creative thinking skills. As many as 83% of respondents stated that they were interested in the PISA 2021 creative thinking ability framework and wanted to try to do a creative thinking ability test with the PISA framework. Thus, teachers have a positive perception of the PISA 2021 creative thinking framework. For this reason, it is recommended for teachers to develop creative thinking instruments with the 2021 PISA framework to measure students' creative thinking skills in learning.

Co-Authors A. Suhandi Achmad Samsudin Adinda Amelia Agus Fanny Chandra Agus Setiawan Ahmad Zulkarnain Zain Andhy Setiawan Anisa Anisa Ari Widodo Ari Widodo Arini Rosa Sinensis Arvina Yulindar Aulia Rahman Cucun Sutinah Dwi Siti Hartinah Eny Ambarawati Efendi, Ridwan Harry Firman Heni Rusnayati HERNANI - Ida Hamidah Indri Eka Putri Maknun, Johar Muhammad Lukman Hakim Nur Endah Susilowati Nurjannah Nurjannah Nurul Yuliadinda R. Riandi, R. Sunardi Sunardi Syaodih, Ernawulan Taufik Ramlan amalis Unang Purwana Winny Liliawati

Title

Found 17 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 17 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 17 Documents
Search