Yatmin Yatmin
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pertanian Dharma Wacana

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

RESPONS SAWI PAGODA (Brassica narinosa) TERHADAP KETEBALAN MULSA JERAMI PADI DAN BERBAGAI KONSENTRASI PUPUK ORGANIK CAIR Wawan Agung Setiawan; Syafiuddin Syafiuddin; Jamaludin Jamaludin; Yatmin Yatmin
Jurnal WACANA PERTANIAN Vol 15, No 2 (2019): Jurnal wacana Pertanian
Publisher : STIPER Dharma Wacana Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37694/jwp.v15i2.63

Abstract

Tatsoi is included in the Brassicaceae family which contains protein, fat, fiber, calcium and several vitamins making the tatsoi an exclusive vegetable. Tatsoi is not widely cultivated by farmers, so there are not many guidelines for the cultivation. To increase the growth and yield of tatsoi  can be done using mulch and Liquid Organic Fertilizer. This study aims to determine effect of the thickness of rice straw mulch and variations  concentration of liquid organic fertilizer on the growth and yield of tatsoi. The research was conducted at the STIPER Dharma Wacana experimental garden from November to December 2018. This study used a randomized block design in two factors. The first factor is the thickness of straw mulch which consists of 3 levels (without mulch, rice straw mulch 10 tonnes/ha, and rice straw mulch 20 tonnes/ha). The second factor is the concentration of liquid organic fertilizer which consists of 3 levels (control,  2 ml / l, and 4 ml / l). The results showed that the thickness of the rice straw mulch had no significant effect on the growth and yield of Tatsoi. The addition of 2 ml / l and 4 ml / l liquid organic fertilizer  significantly increased the growth and yield of tatsoi compared without liquid organic fertilizer  as indicated by the variables of plant height, number of leaves, crown diameter, yield per plot, wet weight salable yield, and  yield per hectare. There is no interaction between the two factors.
PERTUMBUHAN STEK BATANG BUAH NAGA MERAH (Hylocereus costaricensis L.) BERBAGAI UKURAN AKIBAT PEMBERIAN AIR KELAPA DENGAN CARA YANG BERBEDA Didik Setiawan; Syafiuddin Syafiuddin; Jamaludin Jamaludin; Yatmin Yatmin
Jurnal WACANA PERTANIAN Vol 17, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Wacana Pertanian
Publisher : STIPER Dharma Wacana Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37694/jwp.v17i1.73

Abstract

Dragon fruit is one type of plant that is quite popular in Indonesia because of its sweet taste and high selling price. Dragon fruit has various types, including dragon fruit with red flesh, white flesh with yellow skin color and red skin with white flesh. Dragon fruit contains high betacharotene and antioxidants to prevent cancer and ward off free radicals. The fiber content in it can facilitate digestion, prevent colon cancer, and cope with diabetes. The objectives of this study were to determine effect of length stem cuttings on the growth of red dragon fruit cuttings, effect of different methods of giving between immersion and watering coconut water on the growth of dragon fruit cuttings, and interaction lengths cuttings and how to give coconut water to the growth of dragon fruit cuttings. The results showed that red dragon fruit stem lengths of 25 cm and 30 cm give better results than 15 cm and 20 cm.  Dragon fruit stem lengths of 25 cm and 30 cm had a significant effect on bud emergence variables, number of shoots, average shoot length per cuttings and number of roots, but the root length variables, root wet weight and root shoot ratio were not significantly different. The method of giving coconut water shows that watering is better than soaking. but on the variable number of shoots per cuttings, the average length of shoots per cuttings,  root  wet  weight  and  root  crown  ratio  had  no  significant  effect.  There  is  no interaction between rod length and means giving coconut water to the growth of red dragon fruit cuttings on all observed variables.
Faktor Sosial Ekonomi yang Mempengaruhi Pendapatan Usahatani Padi Sawah di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Zulkarnain Zulkarnain; Soni Isnaini; Rakhmiati Rakhmiati; Etik Puji Handayani; Maryati Maryati; Yatmin Yatmin; Supriyadi Supriyadi; Adi Hariyanto; Arif Ferdiansyah
Media Agribisnis Vol 6 No 1 (2022): Mei
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35326/agribisnis.v6i1.2374

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian adalah menganalisis pendapatan usahatani padi sawah dan menganalisis faktor-faktor sosial ekonomi yang mempengaruhi pendapatan usahatani padi sawah di masa pandemi covid-19. Analisis yang digunakan analisis pendapatan dan analisis regresi linier berganda. Teknik pengambilan sampel yaitu simple random sampling sebanyak 51 petani. Hasil penelitian yaitu pendapatan usahatani padi sawah sebesar Rp. 10,368,541.00 /ha/musim tanam dengan nilai R/C ratio sebesar 2,1 (menguntungkan). Faktor sosial ekonomi yang berpengaruh terhadap pendapatan usahatani padi sawah adalah luas lahan, harga pupuk organik, dan harga pupuk ponska, sedangkan faktor yang tidak berpengaruh nyata terhadap pendapatan usahatani padi sawah adalah tingkat pendidikan, harga pupuk kandang, harga pupuk urea, harga pupuk ZA, harga pupuk KCL, harga pestisida, jumlah anggota keluarga dan usia.
Keputusan petani beralih fungsi lahan dari persawahan ke pembibitan tanaman buah Zulkarnain Zulkarnain; Soni Isnaini; Rakhmiati Rakhmiati; Maryati Maryati; Etik Puji Handayani; Yatmin Yatmin; Syafiuddin Syafiuddin

Publisher : Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Yudharta Pasuruan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35891/agx.v14i1.3142

Abstract

????????????????????????????????????????????????: ???????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????? ????????????????????????????????, ???????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????????, ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????? ???????????? ????????????????????????????. ???????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????? ???????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????? ????????????????????. ????????????????????????????????????, ???????????????????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????? ????????????????????????????????. ???????????? ???????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????????????????: (1) ???????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????????, (2) ???????? ???????????????? ???????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????' ???????????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????? ????????????????????. ????????????????????????: ???????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????? ???? ????????????????????????. ???????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????? 104 ???????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????? 38 ???????????????????????????? ???????????? 66 ???????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????. ???????????????? ????????????????????????????????: (1) ???????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????????? ????/???? ????????????????????, (2) ???????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????????. ????????????????????????????: (1) ???????????? ???????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????? ????????. 36.214.234,21 (????/???? ???????????????????? 2,25) ???????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????? ????????. 6.746.722,00 (????/???? ???????????????????? 2,07)., ???????????? (2 ) ???????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????: ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????? ????????????, ???????????????? ????????????????, ???????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????? ???? ???????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????? ????????????????????????????' ???????????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????? ????????????????????????????????????. ????????????????????????????????????????: ???????????? ???????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????, ???????????????? ????????????????, ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????? ???? ???????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????? ????????????????????????????' ???????????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????? ????????????????????????????????????.
RESPONS SELEDRI (Apium graveolens L.) TERHADAP DOSIS NPK YANG DIAPLIKASIKAN DALAM PUPUK ‘KSM’ PADA BERBAGAI INTENSITAS NAUNGAN Arnita Santi; Maryati Maryati; Krisnarini Krisnarini; Yatmin Yatmin; Bigi Undadraja; Alima Maolidea Suri
Jurnal Agrotek Tropika Vol 11, No 2 (2023): JURNAL AGROTEK TROPIKA VOL 11, Mei 2023
Publisher : Departement of Agrotechnology, Agriculture Faculty, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23960/jat.v11i2.6256

Abstract

Budidaya seledri (Apium graveolens L.) di dataran rendah memerlukan upaya manipulasi lingkungan, salah satu cara yang dapat dilakukan adalah dengan pemberian naungan dan pemberian pupuk. Tujuan penelitian adalah: (1) mendapatkan intensitas naungan terbaik untuk tanaman seledri, (2) mendapatkan dosis pupuk NPK dalam pupuk KSM terbaik untuk tanaman seledri, (3) mengetahui interaksi antara intensitas naungan dan dosis pupuk NPK dalam pupuk KSM terhadap tanaman seledri. Penelitian dilaksanakan pada bulan November 2021 sampai Januari 2022 di Dusun I Sinar Jati RT/RW 001/001 Kecamatan Tegineneng Kabupaten Pesawaran Provinsi Lampung, ketinggian tempat 200 m dpl. Metode Split Plot dengan petak utama adalah Intensitas naungan: 50%, 70% dan 90%. Sebagai anak petak adalah dosis pupuk NPK dalam Pupuk KSM, yaitu: dosis standar NPK cara petani 250 kg ha-1, NPK 2 kg L-1 pupuk KSM dan NPK 4 kg L-1 pupuk KSM, NPK 6 kg L-1 pupuk KSM, diulang sebanyak tiga kali. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) naungan 50% menghasilkan laju tumbuh tanaman (LTT)56-50hst, dan laju asimilasi bersih (LAB)56-50 hst lebih tinggi dibandingkan naungan 70% dan 90%, (2) dosis NPK 250 kg/ha cara petani dan dosis NPK dalam KSM menunjukkan hasil tidak berbeda terhadap pertumbuhan seledri (3) tidak terdapat interaksi antara intensitas naungan dan dosispupuk NPK dalam KSM terhadap pertumbuhan dan hasil seledri.
Analysis of Customer Satisfaction with Seller of Aglaonema Flower Plants Zulkarnain Zulkarnain; Soni Isnaini; Rakhmiati Rakhmiati; Maryati Maryati; Etik Puji Handayani; Yatmin Yatmin
Agro Bali : Agricultural Journal Vol 6, No 3 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Panji Sakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37637/ab.v6i3.1224

Abstract

Ornamental plants are a type of plant that provides additional aesthetic value. One of the ornamental plants that is currently trending and popular with consumers is the aglaonema flower. Humans always need the aglaonema flower ornamental plant to fulfill consumer satisfaction. The research aims to determine the level of consumer satisfaction with the seller of aglaonema ornamental plants in Tulus Rejo Village, Pekalongan District, East Lampung Regency. The research location is in Rejo Ikhlas Village, Pekalongan District, East Lampung Regency with the consideration that this area is a production center for sales of aglaonema flower ornamental plants. The research respondents were 30 consumers who bought Aglaonema flowers from within and outside the Pekalongan area, determined by the census method. The sampling technique was accidental sampling technique. The analysis used is Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) and Importance Performance Analysis (IPA). The results of the research on the sale of decorative aglaonema flower plants in Tulus Rejo Village, Pekalongan District, East Lampung Regency are in the "satisfied" category, this can be seen from the calculation CSI of 71.20 percent, which means consumers are satisfied with the seller of aglaonema ornamental plants on the attributes of aglaonema ornamental plants having good quality and quality so that they succeed in satisfying consumers of aglaonema ornamental plants.