Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Bakteri patogen pada telepon genggam mahasiswa fakultas kedokteran Universitas Airlangga angkatan 2014 Ribka Brillyand Angeli Mboe; Marijam Purwanta; Lilik Djuari
Jurnal Kedokteran Syiah Kuala Vol 20, No 1 (2020): Volume 20 Nomor 1 April 2020
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jks.v20i1.11519

Abstract

Recently people use mobile phone in the places that have a high density of microorganisms such as in the hospital, in the kitchen, and in the toilet. Some studied stated that mobile phones played a role in transmission of pathogenic bacteria. Brady et al., reported that 9% to 25% of mobile phones were contaminated with pathogenic bacteria. This research was based on experimental laboratory. The samples were mobile phone, swabbed by wet sterile cotton bud and placed on MacConkey Agar plate and Blood Agar plate. The isolated bacteria were checked by Gram stained. Catalase test for Gram-positive cocci bacteria and specific biochemical test for Gram-negative bacilli bacteria were used to determine the genus of the bacteria. The samples were mobile phone belong to 2014-entering-year students of Medical Faculty of Airlangga University. The sampling method was simple random sampling. This experiment found that 100% of the samples were Staphylococcus spp. positive, 3,3% were Shigella spp. positive and 3,3% were Proteus spp. positive. From this experiment could be concluded that mobile phone  belong to 2014-entering-year students of Medical Faculty of Airlangga University were contaminated by pathogenic bacteria. The result of this experiment found that Shigella spp. and Proteus spp. were pathogenic bacteria on mobile phone belong to 2014-entering-year students of Medical Faculty of Airlangga University.
MYOPIA PREVALENCE AMONG STUDENTS DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS Natasha Hana Savitri; Adinda Sandya Poernomo; Muhammad Bagus Fidiandra1; Eka Candra Setyawan1; Arinda Putri Auna Vanadia1; Bulqis Inas Sakinah1; Lilik Djuari
Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health Research Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022): Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health Research
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (202.78 KB) | DOI: 10.20473/jcmphr.v3i2.30475

Abstract

The lockdown policy was implemented during the Covid-19 pandemic to stop its spread. Indonesia modified the lockdown into PSBB (Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar). During PSBB school activities were replaced with online learning methods. This increased screen time and near-sighted activities and reduced time outdoors, were the risk factors for myopia. The objective of this study was to determine the myopia prevalence among students during the pandemic. This study used a systematic review method with meta-analysis. Data collection was taken from PubMed, Mendeley, and Google Scholar databases published in 2020-2021. The inclusion criterion was research on myopia prevalence among students during the pandemic of Covid-19. Data retrieval used the PICO method and journal adjustments were selected using the PRISMA algorithm. Data analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Out of 971 studies found, only six studies met the criterion. The results of the study based on the forest plot showed high heterogeneity and significant differences in the results. This was probably due to the inclusion criterion being too broad. In the funnel plot, there was a possible publication bias because the data obtained was only available and accessible. Overall, the journals studied stated that increased screen time and lack of outdoor activity increased myopia prevalence. Other risk factors that consistently cause an increase in myopia prevalence are education level, paternal and maternal myopia, and too-close reading distance. Otherwise, age, gender, BMI, eye exercise, eating habits, posture, and lighting while reading showed so many differences in the results that conclusions cannot be made.