Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 17 Documents
Search

Pengaturan Mogok Kerja dalam Perspektif Hukum Indonesia dan Malaysia Santoso, Budi
Pandecta Vol 6, No 1 (2011)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tindakan mogok kerja merupakan jalan terakhir (ultimum remedium) yang dilakukan oleh serikat pekerja/serikat buruh untuk menekan pengusaha agar mau memperbaiki dan atau meningkatkan sistem pengupahan dan atau kondisi-kondisi kerja. Walaupun mogok kerja diakui sebagai hak asasi pekerja berdasar Konvensi ILO Nomor 87 Tahun 1948 dan Konvensi ILO Nomor 98 Tahun 1949, negara mempunyai kepentingan untuk mengatur dan membatasi mogok kerja. Pada perspektif Indonesia dan Malaysia, mogok kerja diakui sebagai hak asasi pekerja berdasarkan alasan bahwa hak pekerja untuk mogok adalah penting sebagai sarana penyeimbang dalam hubungan industrial. Namun demikian, ada perbedaan dalam kontrol dan pembatasan mogok kerja yang dilakukan oleh negara melalui pengaturan hukum. Pada perspektif Indonesia, kontrol dan pembatasan mogok kerja tidak diberikan secara ketat karena alasan demokrasi dan hak asasi manusia. Ini berbeda dengan perspektif Malaysia bahwa kontrol dan pembatasan diberikan secara ketat dengan alasan prioritas kepentingan ekonomi nasional.Strike is a last resort (ultimum remedium) conducted by the collective of workers to pressure employers in order to improve or enhance the system of remuneration and working conditions. Although the strike action has been recognized as the fundamental rights of workers according to ILO Convention Number 87 of 1948 and ILO Convention No 98 of 1949, state has an interest to regulate and restrict the strike action. On Indonesia and Malaysia perspectives, the strike is recognized as the  workers’ rights based on the reason that workers’ rights to strike is important to provide balance in industrial relations. Nevertheless, there is something different on the control and limitation by the state through legal regulation of workers’ right to strike. On Indonesia perspective, the control and limitation is not given strictly due to the reasons of democracy and human rights in accordance with what has been specified in the Constitution of 1945. That is different from Malaysia perspective that the control and limitation is given strictly due to the reason of national economic interest as a priority.
Multidiciplinary Review on The Effects of Backdoor Listing Action Against Standby Purchaser (Acquisitor Company) Adityadarma Bagus Priasmoro Suryono Putro; Budi Santoso; Rachmi Sulistyarini
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol 20, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2020.20.1.2801

Abstract

Backdoor Listing is a "Corporate Action" taken often by companies in Indonesia today. Backdoor Listing is an act in which a closed limited liability company acquires an open limited liability company in order to conduct a right issue without going through the Initial Public Offering (IPO) process. In this paper, the writers attempt to discuss the legal consequences of Backdoor Listing action against Standby Purchasers. The research method was normative juridical using statutory approach and concept approach. In the discussion section, first the writers described the IPO and its inhibition in terms of legal and economic point of view. The review then led to the use of Backdoor Listing as an alternative to capital expansion in addition to the IPO path. The writers inventoried the requirements that must be met before backdoor listing as a conditional legal action.Keywords: initial public offering; backdoor listing; backdoor listing requirement; standby purchaser.
PENGATURAN PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA DALAM PERSPEKTIF KEPENTINGAN EKONOMI DAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA Budi Santoso
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 24, No 2 (2017): December
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.2017.0087.115-123

Abstract

Issue of dismissal is closely related to human rights and economics. The regulating must consider both aspects. This paper explores how the economics perspective and human rights perspective on the issue. On the economics perspective, although the neoclassical economics theory and the theory of new institutional economics have a difference in perspective on the issue, whether or not it stipulated by legislation, but both have a common view that the dismissal should not affect the company's productivity and efficiency. Meanwhile, on the human rights perspective, the worker is entitled to a fair dismissal.
Impilikasi yuridis putusan pailit terhadap profesi notaris menurut peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia Adheria Juniresta; Budi Santoso; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol 12, No 1 (2021): April 2021
Publisher : University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v12i1.5783

Abstract

This paper aims to understand the suitability of the regulations regarding the legalconsequences for notaries who are declared bankrupt. This type of normative legalresearch uses a statutory approach. Based on the results of the discussion, it was concluded that the provisions regarding legal consequences for notaries who weredeclared bankrupt in UUJN were specialist lex of similar provisions in the UUKand PKPU. This is also because the bankruptcy concept in UUJN is different fromthe bankruptcy concept in UUK and PKPU. Bankruptcy under UUK and PKPUoverrides the position of a person who is bankrupt, however bankruptcy in theUUJN may involve a person’s position as a Notary if the bankruptcy is the result ofan error committed by someone in his / her position as a Notary Public. Then thelegal consequence that can be accepted by a Notary who is declared bankrupt is thedismissal of his position as a Notary Public. Notaries can be sued for the fulfillmentof reimbursement of expenses, compensation or interest by the parties on the basis ofacts against the law. The bankruptcy regulation referred to in the UUJN is specificallyaimed at the notary’s position as a legal subject who represents a person andalso as a representative of his position who exercises the authority in making authenticdeeds.How to cite item: Juniresta, A., Santoso, B., Widhiyanti, HN. (2021). Impilikasi yuridis putusan pailit terhadap profesi notaris menurut peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 12(1), 1-10.doi:10.26905/idjch.v12i1.5783.
Kewenangan Kreditur dalam Menjual Obyek Jaminan Tanah dan Bangunan Letter C tanpa Melalu Lelang Nuri Hidayati; Iwan Permadi; Budi Santoso
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 4, No 2 (2019): Desember 2019
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (604.577 KB) | DOI: 10.17977/um019v4i2p291-299

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe the authority of creditors to direct sell warranty objects in the form of land and building Letter C without passing the auction. This study uses normative juridical research methods that study and analyze the application of rules, acts, positive legal norms contained in legislation, jurisprudence, and contracts. This study uses a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. The results show that creditors are authorized to sell warranty objects in the form of land and Letter C buildings without auctions but through underhand sales.  
Kepastian Hukum Permohonan Eksekusi Bangunan yang Berdiri di Atas Tanah Hak Pengelolaan Pemerintah Kota Suchufiel Ula; Budi Santoso
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 6, No 2 (2021): Desember 2021
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (382.432 KB) | DOI: 10.17977/um019v6i2p511-520

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the authority of the fiduciary beneficiary creditor whose object was a building that stands on the land of management rights over city government and legal certainty of loan repayment if the debtor defaults on the fiduciary guarantee. This study used a conceptual and legal approach with a normative juridical type of research. The study results indicated that the authority of the fiduciary beneficiary creditor, whose object was a building that stands on land with the management rights of the city government, was to extend it if the term of the land use permit had expired. The creditor had the right to execute or sell the object of the fiduciary guarantee on the creditor's power if the debtor could not fulfill his obligations. When the debtor defaults, legal certainty for creditors receiving fiduciary guarantees to recover their receivables were applied for execution through a district court based on the executorial title contained in the fiduciary guarantee certificate.
Perlindungan Hukum bagi Konsumen atas Pencantuman Klausula Eksoner dalam Bisnis Pinjam-Meminjam Uang Berbasis Teknologi Informasi di Indonesia Intan Ayu Yulia Rahmawati; Yuliati Yuliati; Budi Santoso
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 5, No 2 (2020): Desember 2020
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (331.261 KB) | DOI: 10.17977/um019v5i2p202-212

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal basis for consumer protection and forms of consumer protection for the inclusion of exoneration clauses in financial technology peer to peer lending. This paper uses normative juridical methods for reviewing and analyzing the application of rules, regulations, and positive legal norms contained in the legislation. The analysis technique uses analytical prescriptive. The results of the study show that there are currently three regulations relating to consumer protection of Financial Technology Peer to Peer Lending in Indonesia, i.e. the Consumer Protection Act, Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 77/ POJK.01/2016 concerning Financial Technology Peer to Peer Lending, and the Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. The form of consumer protection for consumers over financial technology peer to peer lending with addition of clause exoneration is to impose sanctions on the organizer in the form of warning letters, fines, restrictions on business activities, and revocation of licenses granted by the Financial Services Authority. If through giving sanctions the consumer still feels disadvantaged, the consumer can resolve the problem through the District Court or outside the court by the Consumer Dispute Resolution Board.
Perlindungan Hukum Peserta Program Jaminan Hari Tua pada Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial Ketenagakerjaan atas Penunggakan Pembayaran Iuran oleh Pemberi Kerja Andryawan Perdana Dista Agara; Budi Santoso; Dhiana Puspitawati
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 6, No 1 (2021): Juni 2021
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (267.849 KB) | DOI: 10.17977/um019v6i1p11-17

Abstract

The research objectives were to analyze the legal protection of participants of the old age guarantee program as well as the threat of sanctions for companies that delinquent payment of Social Security Agency for Employe (BPJS Employment) dues. The research used a juridical-sociological approach with a type of sociolegal research. Data sources in the form of primary, secondary, and tertiary data were analyzed qualitatively. Legal protection of participants of the old age guarantee program consisted of preventive legal protection, namely through Government Regulation Number 60 of 2015, and repressive legal protection based on internal Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) from BPJS Employment provided if the company in question delinquent dues payment. The threat of sanctions for companies that delinquent payment of BPJS Employment dues was in the form of administrative sanctions, although in practice the sanctions were considered ineffective to be applied.
Alternative Solution on the Execution of Court’s Verdict within Employment Termination Dispute Budi Santoso
Yuridika Vol. 33 No. 3 (2018): Volume 33 No 3 September 2018
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (268.056 KB) | DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v33i3.7928

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the juridical barriers of execution of verdict in case of dismissal dispute as well as offering a solution to the execution of such verdict to be carried out so that workers obtain their rights. Through the statute and case approaches, it is concluded that the juridical barriers are: 1) in a reminder implementation, the existing regulation does not authorize the bailiff to force the defendant to attend the reminder call if the defendant refuses to attend the call voluntarily; and 2) in the execution seizure, the goods to be confiscated shall belong to the defendant, whereas the plaintiff can not prove it because all the evidence is in the hands of the employer. While alternative solutions in order the verdict may be executed well are: 1) involving authorized third parties who may assist the worker as a plaintiff to prove the ownership of the items for which the request is for confiscation; and 2) implementing the body’s forced effort to an employer with a bad faith in accordance with Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 Year 2000, but by reducing the minimum limit of debt that is not as much as one billion rupiah due to cases of dismssal dispute are less possibility of paying for the workers’ rights who reached that amount.
Juridical Analysis on Entrepreneurs’ Obligation of Effort to Prevent Termination of Employment Budi Santoso
Yuridika Vol. 35 No. 1 (2020): Volume 35 No 1 January 2020
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (251.466 KB) | DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v35i1.12639

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the applicability of the employer's duty of care to prevent employment termination based on Article 15(1) Act No. 13 of 2003 on Labour, questioning if those obligations applied to all grounds and reasons resulting in termination of employment. To answer the objectives, this legal research uses the method of legislative approach by analyzing the available legal sources through systematic interpretation and legal argumentations. Relying on the result of the discussion, a conclusion is reached that employer's obligation of effort to prevent termination employment, as regulated under Article 151(1) UUK, is excluded when the employee is unable to perform its obligated duty after six months because he/she is entangled in criminal proceedings. If the Court decides the proceedings before the six months term ends and the employee is found to be guilty, then he/she is no longer the responsibility of the employer.