Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

p-Index From 2019 - 2024

2.338

P-Index

This Author published in this journals

All Journal Pandecta Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Arena Hukum Jurnal Media Hukum Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Yuridika Perspektif Hukum Legal Protection for the Partnership Agreement Parties

Budi Santoso

Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya

Author-ID : 2812225

Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 17 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

Title

Alternative Solution on the Execution of Court’s Verdict within Employment Termination Dispute Budi Santoso
Yuridika Vol. 33 No. 3 (2018): Volume 33 No 3 September 2018
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

This paper aims to analyze the juridical barriers of execution of verdict in case of dismissal dispute as well as offering a solution to the execution of such verdict to be carried out so that workers obtain their rights. Through the statute and case approaches, it is concluded that the juridical barriers are: 1) in a reminder implementation, the existing regulation does not authorize the bailiff to force the defendant to attend the reminder call if the defendant refuses to attend the call voluntarily; and 2) in the execution seizure, the goods to be confiscated shall belong to the defendant, whereas the plaintiff can not prove it because all the evidence is in the hands of the employer. While alternative solutions in order the verdict may be executed well are: 1) involving authorized third parties who may assist the worker as a plaintiff to prove the ownership of the items for which the request is for confiscation; and 2) implementing the body’s forced effort to an employer with a bad faith in accordance with Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 Year 2000, but by reducing the minimum limit of debt that is not as much as one billion rupiah due to cases of dismssal dispute are less possibility of paying for the workers’ rights who reached that amount.

Juridical Analysis on Entrepreneurs’ Obligation of Effort to Prevent Termination of Employment Budi Santoso
Yuridika Vol. 35 No. 1 (2020): Volume 35 No 1 January 2020
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

This article aims to analyze the applicability of the employer's duty of care to prevent employment termination based on Article 15(1) Act No. 13 of 2003 on Labour, questioning if those obligations applied to all grounds and reasons resulting in termination of employment. To answer the objectives, this legal research uses the method of legislative approach by analyzing the available legal sources through systematic interpretation and legal argumentations. Relying on the result of the discussion, a conclusion is reached that employer's obligation of effort to prevent termination employment, as regulated under Article 151(1) UUK, is excluded when the employee is unable to perform its obligated duty after six months because he/she is entangled in criminal proceedings. If the Court decides the proceedings before the six months term ends and the employee is found to be guilty, then he/she is no longer the responsibility of the employer.

Job Loss Guarantee Program Policy as Legal Protection for Terminated Workers Based on Job Creation Law Article 46 Try Wahyu Widanarti; Abdul Rachmad Budiono; Budi Santoso
Yuridika Vol. 37 No. 2 (2022): Volume 37 No 2 May 2022
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v37i2.37452

To provide legal protection for workers who have experienced termination of employment, the government of Indonesia has issued a new policy in the form of Article 46 of Law No. 11 of 2020 concerning the Job Creation Law. This increases the type of protection for social security programs, namely the job loss guarantee program. This paper uses a juridical-normative research method. The results indicate that the legal protection policy for workers affected by termination of employment was not appropriate. Therefore, an amendment was made to Law Number 40 of 2004 concerning the National Social Security System. Specifically, Article 46A of the Job Creation Law states: "Workers or employees who have their activities terminated are entitled to collateral due to loss of profession." Article 46C(2) also states that the Central Authority should pay the professional burnout insurance contributions. In this case, non-professional collateral benefits are not focused on money but on cash, access to actionable market data, and job training. It is not explained in detail what percentage of the total compensation will be obtained by workers affected by termination of employment through this job loss guarantee scheme. This is only stated in Article 46D paragraph (2), "Job loss guarantee will be provided for 6 (six) months of wages."

Co-Authors Abdul Rachmad Budiono Adheria Juniresta Adityadarma Bagus Priasmoro Suryono Putro Andryawan Perdana Dista Agara Cahya Khaerani Dhiana Puspitawati Didik Artino Jamaludin Hanif Nur Widhiyanti Hanif Nur Widhiyanti Hanif Nurwidhiyanti Intan Ayu Yulia Rahmawati Iwan Permadi Nuri Hidayati Rachmi Sulistyarini Ratih Dheviana Puru Hito Rocky Marciano Ambar Sihabuddin Sihabuddin Suchufiel Ula Suhariningsih Suhariningsih Try Wahyu Widanarti Widaningsih Widaningsih, Widaningsih Yuliati Yuliati

Title Search

Found 3 Documents Search Journal : Yuridika

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Yuridika