Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

Status Kepemilikan Saham Hasil Pembatalan Penggabungan Perseroan Terbatas oleh Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Dian Karina Fitri; Sihabudin Sihabudin; Bambang Winarno
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol 10, No 1 (2019): June 2019
Publisher : University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v10i1.2609

Abstract

Limited Liability Company is a legal action carried out by one or more companies to merge with other existing companies which then results in the assets and liabilities of the company which merges itself due to the law to the company that receives the merger and subsequently the legal entity status those who join will end because ofthe law. This study discusses the status of share ownership resulting from the cancellation of the merger of Limited Liability Company. The purpose of this study is to analyze the absence of legal rules regarding share ownership status after cancellation by the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (hereinafter referred to as KPPU). The researcher used the normative jurisdiction method. The approach used is the legislative approach. Legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials. Legal material collection techniques used through library studies. The analysis technique used is deductive logic, which draws conclusions from the general to the specific. The results of the study indicate that there is a legal vacuum in share ownership status related to the cancellation of the merger of Limited Liability Company. Because the emptiness causes legal uncertainty and huge consequences for the business world.How to cite item: Fitri, D., Sihabudin, S., Winarno, B. (2019). Status Kepemilikan Saham Hasil Pembatalan Penggabungan Perseroan Terbatas oleh Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 10(1), 9-17. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v10i1.2609
Kedudukan Permenkumham Nomor 17 Tahun 2018 dalam Menjamin Kepastian Berusaha Persekutuan Komanditer Mochammad Aznawi Faisal; Sihabudin Sihabudin; Shinta Hadiyantina
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 6, No 2 (2021): Desember 2021
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (332.471 KB) | DOI: 10.17977/um019v6i2p282-289

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze changes in the provisions for registering limited partnership after enacting the Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 17 of 2018 and the position of Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 17 of 2018 on the hierarchy of laws and regulations in Indonesia. The type of research used was normative juridical law with a conceptual, historical, and statutory approach. After the enactment of Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 17 of 2018, the authority to register limited partnerships, which was previously the authority of the Minister of Trade, was transferred to the Minister of Law and Human Rights. The position of Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 17 of 2018 is seen from the procedure for forming ministerial regulations that do not meet the requirements as implementing regulations and are contrary to the principle of business certainty.
Implikasi Hukum Penggunaan Data Pribadi Pihak Ketiga Terhadap Keabsahan Perjanjian Pinjam Meminjam Uang Berbasis Teknologi Informasi I Nyoman Adi Pardana; Sihabudin Sihabudin; Dhiana Puspitawati
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 4, No 2 (2019): Desember 2019
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (304.955 KB) | DOI: 10.17977/um019v4i2p341-351

Abstract

This study focuses on discussing the validity of information technology-based loan contracts and the use of third party personal data for company activities in the event of default. This study uses a normative juridical method with a legislative approach and a case approach. Loan contracts use legitimate electronic transactions if there is a contract of the parties that bind themselves. An information technology-based loan contracts to borrow money using third party personal data without permission will not cancel the contract. A third party can apply to the court to cancel himself as a party involved in the agreement.
Pengaturan Klausul Pilihan Hukum dan Pilihan Forum dalam Perjanjian Asuransi Kapal di Indonesia Rahmadany Firmansyah; Sihabudin Sihabudin; M. Sudirman
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 7, No 1 (2022): Maret 2022
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (342.508 KB) | DOI: 10.17977/um019v7i1p77-86

Abstract

The ship insurance agreement was prone to causing problems because the parties were in different jurisdictions, such as in the dispute over the PT. Purna Arthanugraha Insurance (PT. ASPAN) with PT. Indonesian Maritime Business Development (PT. Bumi Shipmanagement). The insurance policy agreement, in this case, was subject to and complied with English law, but the settlement of the case was filed in a court in Indonesia. This case became a legal problem in determining the choice of law arrangement and forum for resolving disputes. Based on these problems, this study aimed to analyze the regulation over the choice of law clause and the choice of forum in the ship insurance agreement. The approach used in this study was a case study approach and a statutory approach. The type of research used in this study was normative juridical, the data analysis technique used descriptive, interpretation, evaluation and argumentation techniques. The study results showed that the choice of law clause in the ship insurance agreement based on the agreement of the two parties referred to the applicable law in England, namely the Marine Insurance Act 1906. The setting of the forum choice clause in the ship insurance agreement was not regulated strictly and explicitly, so the dispute was submitted by one of the parties to the district court based on civil procedural law. Settlement of ship insurance agreement disputes through a lawsuit to the district court was not ideal because the district court's scope was limited to civil cases of a general nature.
FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI GAGALNYA MEDIASI DALAM PENANGANAN PERKARA TANAH DI PENGADILAN NEGERI AMBON salman ardy; Sihabudin Sihabudin; Ismail Navianto
Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan Vol 2, No 1 (2018): Februari
Publisher : Universitas Islam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (433.857 KB) | DOI: 10.33474/hukeno.v2i1.1072

Abstract

AbstrakPelaksanaan mediasi dalam penyelesaian perkara perdata di Pengadilan pada hakikatnya merupakan bentuk implementasi dari musyawarah mufakat. Hal ini diatur dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan. Pengintegrasian mediasi kedalam tata beracara di Pengadilan salah satunya bertujuan untuk menekan jumlah perkara yang naik ke tingkat banding maupun kasasi. Apabila perkara dapat didamaikan melalui mediasi di Pengadilan Tingkat Pertama maka dapat meminimalisir penumpukan perkara pada tingkat banding dan Kasasi. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi gagalnya proses mediasi dalam mencapai kesepakatan damai di Pengadilan, khususnya di Pengadilan Negeri AmbonKata kunci:  Mediasi di Pengadilan, Perkara Perdata, Pengadilan Negeri Ambon AbstractImplementation of mediation in completion of the civil cases at the court basically was an implementation of discussion to reach an agreement. These matter was arranged at regulation by the court of law No. 1/2016 about mediation procedure at the court. Mediation integration into be in session of court have purpose to suppress amount of case that climb to consideration or appeal to supreme court. Purpose of this research are to find out and analyze factors that influenced failed of mediation to reach agreement at the court, especially at Ambon state-owned courtKeyword: Mediation in Court, Civil Law, Ambon state-owned court
PENGATURAN KEBIJAKAN PEMERINTAH INDONESIA MENGENAI TATA NIAGA IMPOR PANGAN Sihabudin Sihabudin
Arena Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2015)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (789.557 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2015.00802.5

Abstract

AbstractPolicy is a government decision that is general and preveils to all people. The legal consequences of being a member of the world trade organization is that the Indonesian government must take submissive and obedient to the rules agreed in international trade agreements related to exports and imports, including making changes to the legal instruments and policy development in the trade sector. The marketing of rice and several other food commodities involving import has dimensions that are not simple problems, even multi-dimensional, ranging from economic, political, as well as socio-cultural.Indonesian government's policies regarding the regulation of food import regulation is an effort to protect domestic manufacturers from dumping activities or due to increased imports, Indonesia is also to protect consumers from imported products that do not meet the quality standards of security and health of consumers.This paper is about to do a reformulation of the government's policy regarding the adjustment of the trade system for food imports, in order to find effective policy formulation and efficient in solving the problems that arise regarding the marketing of food imports that has been happening. By using descriptive normative legal analysis, the study found that the common thread of chaos cross trade system for food import regulations which are due to unfitted between national regulations and regional regulations (AFTA, CAFTA, APEC) as well as global regulations (GATT-WTO). Thus, administrative reform of domestic and foreign trade are necessary, particularly regarding to the procedure of rice imports. All forms of deviations in import licensing process, document manipulation, and the pattern of non-governmental practices must obtain decisive action, both administratively and legally, as a valuable shock-therapy. AbstrakKebijakan adalah keputusan pemerintah yang bersifat umum dan berlaku untuk seluruh anggota masyarakat. Konsekuensi hukum dari menjadi anggota organisasi perdagangan dunia adalah bahwasanya pemerintah Indonesia harus ikut tunduk dan patuh pada kaidah-kaidah yang disepakati dalam persetujuan perdagangan internasional terkait ekspor-impor, termasuk melakukan perubahan terhadap instrumen hukum dan kebijaksanaan pembangunan di sektor perdagangan. Tata niaga beras dan beberapa komoditas pangan lain yang melibatkan impor memiliki dimensi permasalahan yang tidak sederhana, bahkan multi-dimensi, mulai dari ekonomi, politik, bahkan sosio kultural. Kebijakan pemerintah Indonesia mengenai pengaturan tata niaga impor pangan merupakan upaya melindungi produsen dalam negeri dari kegiatan dumping atau karena meningkatnya produk impor, juga untuk melindungi konsumen Indonesia dari produk impor yang tidak memenuhi standar kualitas keamanan dan kesehatan konsumen. Tulisan ini hendak melakukan reformulasi kebijakan pemerintah mengenai pengatuan tata niaga impor pangan, agar ditemukan rumusan kebijakan yang efektif dan efisien dalam menyelesaikan problematika yang muncul seputar tata niaga impor pangan yang selama ini terjadi. Dengan menggunakan analisis hukum normatif deskriptif, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa benang merah dari silang sengkarut regulasi tata niaga impor pangan diantaranya adalah karena tidak sinkronnya antara regulasi nasional dengan regulasi regional (AFTA, CAFTA, APEC) maupun regulasi global (GATT-WTO). Sehingga, diperlukan pembenahan administrasi perdagangan dalam negeri dan perdagangan luar negeri, khususnya yang berhubungan dengan prosedur impor beras. Segala bentuk penyimpangan dalam proses perizinan impor, manipulasi dokumen, dan pola praktik non-pemerintah perlu memperoleh tindakan tegas, baik secara administratif, maupun secara legal, sebagai shock-therapy yang berharga. 
REEVALUASI PEMBIAYAAN PERUSAHAAN MELALUI MODAL VENTURA DI INDONESIA Sihabudin SIHABUDIN
Arena Hukum Vol. 9 No. 2 (2016)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (399.37 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2016.00902.8

Abstract

AbstractThis paper aims to discuss the development of venture capital reevaluation in Indonesia that provides an opportunity for businesses to develop the corporation through financing. This paper uses normative juridical research. The results of the analysis is that the regulation and legal policy which can provide adequate legal protection is needed to support the corporation neither the corporation founded by the State or by private parties. Capital is needed in the establishment and operation of an enterprise, including through venture capital. Therefore, the existence of venture capital should be supported by the government as a regulator and facilitator and community businesses which can grow better so that not only large companies but also small firms and medium can be helped by the growth of venture capital. On the other hand, since the inclusion of funds to the venture capital system is high risk for investors, then early investors must be careful in order to save funds or capital is entered into the corporation's business partners. AbstrakTulisan ini bertujuan untuk membahas mengenai reevaluasi Pengembangan modal ventura di indonesia memberikan kesempatan bagi pelaku bisnis untuk mengembangkan perusahaannya melalui pembiayaan.Tulisan ini menggunakan penelitian yuridis normatif. Hasil dari analisis dalam tulisan ini adalah bahwa  Pengaturan dan kebijakan hukum yang dapat memberikan  perlindungan hukum yang memadai diperlukan untuk mendukung kegiatan perusahaan baik perusahaan yang didirikan oleh Negara maupun oleh pihak swasta . Dalam pendirian dan operasional sebuah perusahaan dibutuhkan modal termasuk melalui modal ventura. Oleh karena itu keberadaan modal ventura harus didukung oleh pemerintah sebagai regulator dan fasilitator serta masyarakat pelaku bisnis agar modal ventura dapat berkembang lebih baik sehingga bukan hanya perusahaan besar, namun juga perusahaaan kecil dan menengah dapat terbantu oleh pertumbuhan modal ventura. Di lain pihak berhubung penyertaan dana dengan sistem modal ventura ini mengandung risiko tinggi bagi pemodal, maka dari awal pemodal (venture capitalist) harus berhati-hati guna menyelamatkan dana/modal yang dimasukkan ke dalam perusahaan mitra bisnisnya.
KEABSAHAN AKTA HIBAH SAHAM PADA SUATU PERSEROAN DALAM HAL TERDAPAT KLAUSULA PEMBAYARAN Tanti Rachmawati; Sihabudin Sihabudin; Reka Dewantara
Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan Vol. 6 No. 3 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33474/hukeno.v6i3.16616

Abstract

Tujuan penulisan ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan dan menganalisis mengenai rasio decidendi dalam dasar pertimbangan hakim pada putusan nomor 604/Pdt.G/2011/PN.Jkt.Sel jo. 605/Pdt.G/2011/PN.Jkt.Sel mengenai akta hibah saham yang disertai dengan klausula pembayaran dan juga untuk mendeskripsikan dan menganalisis keabsahan akta hibah saham dalam hal terdapat klausula pembayaran. Untuk kegunaan pembahasan, jenis penelitian hukum normatif ini menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekаtаn kasus (case аpproаch), serta pendekatan analisis (analytical approach). Bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder dianalisa dengan menggunakan metode penafsiran gramatikal dan sistematis. Berdasarkan hasil pembahasan diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa rasio decidendi dalam dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus perkara berdasarkan putusan nomor 604/Pdt.G/2011/PN.Jkt.Sel jo. 605/Pdt.G/2011/PN.Jkt.Sel adalah adanya kesalahan materiil pada akta hibah saham dimana suatu perbuatan hibah harus memenuhi unsur-unsur Cuma-Cuma sebagaimana diatur dalam pasal 1666 KUHPerdata yang mana unsur Cuma-Cuma merupakan esensi utama dalam hibah. Sementara dalam perkara ini diketahui bahwa terdapat perjanjian lain dibalik perjanjian hibah yang dilakukan, yaitu perjanjian investasi yang didalamnya memuat mengenai pembayaran sejumlah uang tertentu atas hibah yang telah diberikan. Berdasarkan pertimbangan tersebut, hakim memutus perkara ini sebagai sebuah perbuatan melawan hukum dikarenakan telah terpenuhinya unsur-unsur perbuatan melawan hukum berdasarkan Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata dan menyatakan perbuatan hibah tersebut batal demi hukum. Mengenai keabsahan akta hibah, dalam perkara ini, pengalihan hak atas saham antara Nyonya Ani Setiawan dan Nyonya Florita selaku pemegang saham lama dalam RTM kepada TCUP dilakukan atas dasar akta hibah saham, namun terdapat cacat hukum dalam akta hibah ini dan perbuatan hibah ini batal demi hukum sehingga pengalihan hak atas saham dianggap tidak pernah terjadi.   The purpose of this writing is to describe and analyze the ratio decidendi in the judge's consideration in the decision number 604/Pdt.G/2011/PN.Jkt.Sel jo. 605/Pdt.G/2011/PN.Jkt.Sel regarding the deed of gift of shares accompanied by a payment clause, as well as to describe and analyze the validity of the deed of gift of shares in case of a payment clause. For the purpose of this legal research, a normative approach using the statute approach, case approach, and analytical approach is used. Primary and secondary legal materials are analyzed using grammatical and systematic interpretation methods. Based on the results of the discussion, it is concluded that the ratio decidendi in the judge's consideration in deciding the case based on decision number 604/Pdt.G/2011/PN.Jkt.Sel jo. 605/Pdt.G/2011/PN.Jkt.Sel is the material error in the deed of gift of shares where a gift must meet the elements of "Cuma-Cuma" as regulated in article 1666 of the Indonesian Civil Code. The "Cuma-Cuma" element is the main essence of a gift. In this case, it is known that there was another agreement behind the gift agreement, namely an investment agreement which contained the payment of a certain amount of money for the gift that had been given. Based on these considerations, the judge ruled that this was an unlawful act because the elements of an unlawful act under article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code had been fulfilled, and declared the gift deed null and void. Regarding the validity of the deed of gift, in this case, the transfer of rights to shares between Mrs. Ani Setiawan and Mrs. Florita as the old shareholders in RTM to TCUP was carried out based on the deed of gift of shares, but there was a legal defect in this deed of gift, and therefore the gift was considered null and void, so the transfer of rights to shares is considered never to have occurred. Keywords : Deed of Gift, Cancellation, Validity
HAK KREDITOR DENGAN TAGIHAN PIUTANG TERTOLAK DALAM PROSES PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG Sihabudin Sihabudin; Edo Adhitama
Arena Hukum Vol. 16 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2023.01601.5

Abstract

One of the stages in delaying payment of receivables obligations (PKPU) is the verification of receivables. There may be a possibility that the claim for receivables being rejected at the verification stage may occur, but there is no legal remedy that can be taken by the creditor, either ordinary or extraordinary legal remedies. This article aims to analyze the legal protection of creditors' receivables which are rejected at the receivables verification stage by administrators in the PKPU process and the authority of the supervisory judge in terms of the creditor's bill being rejected at the receivables verification stage. This normative research uses a statutory approach. The results show that Law Number 37 of 2004 does not regulate legal remedies if receivables are rejected in the accounts receivable verification. Efforts are made when this happens, the supervisory judge has the authority to reconcile creditors and debtors in determining. Thus, the debtor does not need to wait for the emergence of a settlement homologation if the bill is rejected in the verification of receivables to submit an appeal to the Supreme Court.
The Urgency of Regulating Remote Working System In Indonesia Between Certainty and Utility Brigita Estu Putri Kristanti; Sihabudin; Siti Hamidah
International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Vol 5 No 3 (2023): IJIERM: Edition September
Publisher : The Islamic Education and Multiculturalism Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijierm.v5i3.270

Abstract

The absence of comprehensive regulations regarding remote work in Indonesia has given rise to various challenges, particularly concerning justice, legal certainty, and benefits for workers. Analyzing the Implementation of Legal Protection for Parties through Agreements Offered by Authorized Officials Regarding Underhand Debt Dispute with Objects Bound by Purchase. The methodology employed in this study is normative juridical, utilizing Namely, it is carried out through an examination of legislative regulations related to the urgency of remote working regulations in Indonesia. and conceptual approaches involves reviewing the opinions of experts regarding the urgency of remote working regulations in Indonesia. The legal material analysis technique employs Grammatical interpretation, Systematic interpretation, and Teleological interpretation. The research findings indicate that, from philosophical, normative, juridical, and sociological standpoints, there is an urgent need to tailor regulations that can address the unique aspects of remote work, which fundamentally differ from conventional office-based employment.