B. Widharyanto
Sanata Dharma University

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

KLASIFIKASI DAN KEKHASAN PAMERAN SENI RUPA DI YOGYAKARTA: KASUS ENAM INSTITUSI BUDAYA Purnomo, D. Heri; Widharyanto, B.
Imaji Vol 18, No 2 (2020): IMAJI OKTOBER
Publisher : FBS UNY

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/imaji.v18i2.40192

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji klasifikasi dan kekhususan pameran seni rupa yang dilakukan olehenam institusi budaya di Yogyakarta. Untuk menjawab isu tersebut, penelitian ini menggunakanpendekatan kualitatif. Data yang berupa jenis dan karakteristik pameran seni rupa diperolehdengan teknik wawancara dan analisis dokumen. Data penelitian selanjutnya dianalisis melaluitiga tahap, yakni identifikasi, klasifikasi, dan interpretasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwapameran seni rupa yang dilaksanakan oleh enam institusi budaya memiliki ruang lingkup sebagaiberikut: MGA dalam 18 kategori, TBY dalam 33 kategori, BBY dalam 29 kategori, TRB dalam31 kategori, LAF dalam 16 kategori, dan JG dalam 31 kategori. Temuan lainnya adalah masingmasing institusi budaya menunjukkan kekhasan pameran seni rupa dalam kategori tertentu.Kata Kunci: klasifikasi, karakteristik, pameran, seni rupaCLASSIFICATION AND TYPICALITY OF FINE ART EXHIBITIONS IN YOGYAKARTA: THE CASE OF SIX CULTURAL INSTITUTIONSAbstractThis research examines the classification and uniqueness of fine art exhibitions conductedby six cultural institutions in Yogyakarta. This study used a qualitative approach to answerthe question. Data presented in the form of the type and characteristics of fine art exhibitionswere obtained through interview techniques and document analysis. Further research data wereanalyzed through three stages, namely identification, classification, and interpretation. The resultsshow that fine art exhibitions conducted by six cultural institutions had the following scope: MGAin 18 categories, TBY in 33 categories, BBY in 29 categories, TRB in 31 categories, LAF in 16categories, and JG in 31 categories. Another finding is that each cultural institution shows theuniqueness of fine art exhibitions in certain categories.Keywords: classification, characteristics, exhibition, fine art
Kompetensi Pedagogik dan Profesional Guru Bahasa Indonesia SMA di Bawah Naungan Yayasan Pendidikan Nusa Cendana Sumba Barat Daya Engel Bertha Halena Gena; B. Widharyanto; Yuliana Setyaningsih
Jurnal Edukasi Sumba (JES) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019)
Publisher : SekolahTinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (STKIP)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53395/jes.v3i1.2

Abstract

Abstrak: Kompetensi pedagogik dan kompetensi profesional merupakan dua kompetensi guru yang sangat erat hubungannya dengan tugas profesi seorang guru. Kompetensi pedagogik yaitu kompetensi guru dalam mengelola pembelajaran sedangkan kompetensi profesional yaitu kompetensi guru dalam melaksanakan tugas kependidikan yang berkaitan dengan bidang studi. Tulisan ini menyoroti kemampuan penguasaan pedagogik, penyusunan perangkat pembelajaran (RPP), keterampilan mengajar, dan pengetahuan profesional guru Bahasa Indonesia SMA di Bawah Naungan Yayasan Pendidikan Nusa Cendana Sumba Barat Daya Tahun 2017. Peneliti menggunakan metode kuantitatif deskriptif dalam mengungkapkan data yang terkumpul melalui teknik tes, teknik observasi, dan studi dokumenter. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kompetensi pedagogik guru termasuk dalam kualifikasi Baik sedangkan tingkat penguasaan dalam penyusunan perangkat pembelajaran, keterampilan mengajar, dan pengetahuan profesional guru termasuk dalam kualifikasi Kurang. Artinya, perlu adanya upaya peningkatan khususnya pada penyusunan RPP, keterampilan mengajar, dan pengetahan profesional guru Bahasa Indonesia.Kata kunci: Kompetensi pedagogic; kompetensi professional; guru bahasa Indonesia.
LEARNING STYLE AND LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGIES OF STUDENTS FROM VARIOUS ETHNICS IN INDONESIA Bonifasius Widharyanto; Heribertus Binawan
Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan Vol 39, No 2 (2020): CAKRAWALA PENDIDIKAN, VOL. 39, NO. 2, JUNE 2020
Publisher : LPMPP Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (260.071 KB) | DOI: 10.21831/cp.v39i2.28173

Abstract

Learning styles, language learning strategies, and ethnicity are three important factors in language learning. The information about these three things is very useful for language teachers to prepare and implement effective language learning. This study was conducted to describe the students ' learning style and language learning strategy and to know the similarities/differences from the two elements of Java, Papua, Flores, Dayak, and Batak ethnics. A number of 175 participants were involved in the study. Research data were obtained through the Fleming's learning VARK questionnaire and a language learning strategy questionnaire from Oxford. The results of the two questionnaires were analyzed to determine the type of learning style and language learning strategy. The first finding suggests that the main learning styles of students from the five ethnics are variants [aural] and [kinesthetic] including variations in bimodal, and trimodal. The second finding shows that the major language learning strategy is metacognitive and affective. The third finding reveals some similarities and unique differences in their learning style and learning strategy.
TRAINING EVALUATION OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS OF 3T REGIONS OF MAHAKAM ULU REGENCY BY USING KIRKPATRICK Sebastianus Widanarto Prijowuntato; Bonifasius Widharyanto
IJIET (International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching) Vol 5, No 2 (2021): July 2021
Publisher : Sanata Dharma University Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24071/ijiet.v5i2.3540

Abstract

This study aims to determine the success of training for elementary school teachers in Mahakam Ulu Regency, North Kalimantan in 2016 and 2017. The evaluation method used is the evaluation method proposed by Kirkpatrick. In this study, two of the four levels were investigated. The study method used is the Kirkpatrik evaluation model level one and two. At level one, participants conduct evaluations related to satisfaction and level two participants evaluate learning. At level one, participants are asked to fill in satisfaction instruments. The results of the satisfaction instrument entry were analyzed using weighting on each of the satisfaction dimensions. At level two, participants are asked to work on the pre-test and post-test instruments. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon Test. The results showed that the level of participant satisfaction for first level was 83.848% for 2015 and 83,178% for 2016. Both scores showed positive reactions to the training. For For second level, learning, the average increase in knowledge was 10.984 for 2015 and 9.4 for 2016. The increase in the mean score was significantly based on the Wilcoxon test.Â