Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan
Joko Ariyanto
Universitas Sebelas Maret
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis keterampilan komunikasi pada pembelajaran biologi sekolah menengah atas Assabai Nizar Urwani; Murni Ramli; Joko Ariyanto
Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA Vol 4, No 2: October 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (124.894 KB) | DOI: 10.21831/jipi.v4i2.21465

Abstract

Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui dominasi komunikasi scientific pada pembelajaran biologi di kelas X IPA 1, mengetahui dominasi komunikasi scientific pada pembelajaran biologi di kelas XI IPA 1, dan mengetahui hambatan keterampilan komunikasi siswa pada pembelajaran biologi. Penelitian yang dilakukan merupakan penelitian observasi kelas (classroom observation). Observasi dilakukan di dua kelas, yaitu kelas X IPA 1 dan kelas XI IPA 1. Observasi dilakukan selama 5 kali observasi pada masing-masing kelas. Observasi dilakukan dari tanggal 22 Februari 2017 sampai 10 Mei 2017. Observasi dilakukan dengan cara mencatat seluruh komunikasi antara siswa dan guru selama proses pembelajaran biologi. Subjek penelitian adalah siswa kelas X IPA 1 dan XI IPA 1 MAN 2 Surakarta tahun ajaran 2016/2017 pada semester genap. Teknik pengambilan subjek penelitian dilakukan dengan cara purposive sampling berdasarkan pertimbangan dari guru. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan cara observasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Analisis data menggunakan matriks kategori VICS Flanders. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan dominasi komunikasi scientific selama observasi di kelas X IPA 1 dan XI IPA 1 adalah dominasi komunikasi yang seimbang atau komunikasi dua arah. Persentase dominasi komunikasi yang seimbang di kelas X IPA 1 adalah 50,26%, sedangkan persentase dominasi komunikasi yang seimbang di kelas XI IPA 1 adalah 43,08%. Hambatan komunikasi scientific siswa, yaitu hambatan psikologis, fisik, semantik, dan proses.Analysis of communications skill on biology learning high school AbstractThe research aims to find out the dominance of scientific communication in biology learning of class X IPA 1, to find out the dominance of  scientific communication in biology learning of class XI IPA 1, and to find out the communication barriers occurred in the biology learning. The research was a classroom observation research. The observations were conducted in two class (class X IPA 1 and class XI IPA 1). The observations of each class were made five times. The observations were conducted from the 22 February 2017 to 10 May 2017. The observation recorded all communication between students and teacher during the process learning biology. The population of this research was students of class X IPA 1 and XI IPA 1 in MAN 2 Surakarta. The subjects were selected using purposive sampling recommended by the biology teacher. The data were collected by the observations, interviews, and documentations. The data were analyzed using the VICS Flanders matrix. The results showed the dominance of scientific communications in class X IPA 1 and XI IPA 1 of MAN 2 Surakarta was balanced or two-way communication. The percentage of the dominance of scientific communications in class X IPA 1 was 50.26 %. The percentage of the dominance of scientific communications in class XI IPA 1 was 43.08%. The barriers to the students' communications were psychological, physical, semantic, and process.
Profile of High School Students' Arguments on Environmental Pollution Materials in the Covid-19 Era Yeni Puspitasari; Sri Widoretno; Joko Ariyanto; Bowo Sugiharto; Sri Dwiastuti; Candra Adi Prabowo
AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan Vol 14, No 4 (2022): AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan
Publisher : STAI Hubbulwathan Duri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35445/alishlah.v14i4.1989

Abstract

The study aims to identify the argumentation profile of high school students in learning in the covid-19 era. This research is quantitative descriptive with a survey method. The research population was 172 students, with a sample of 72 students. Determination of the sample using cluster random sampling technique has a balanced quality from the results of the paired F test. The research procedure was carried out by collecting data on student answers from argumentative essay questions distributed via a google form. Argumentative questions based on TAP contain six components, namely Evidence (E), Warrant (W), Backing (B), Qualifier (Q), Rebuttal (R), and Claim (C). The argumentation scoring rubric is calculated based on the Patton-Pickle rule. Data analysis was carried out by interpreting the scores obtained by students on each argumentation component that showed the argumentation profile. Most of the students' argumentation profiles, according to their components, are in the very low category scores, namely 0.5 and 1. A score of 0.5 is obtained by comparing the percentages of students: E: E: W: W: B: Q: R: C: C: C by 23.61%: 1.39%: 0.00%: 52.78%: 45.83%: 83.33 %: 4.17%: 2.78%: 2.78%: 0.00% while the score of 1 is 41.67%: 55.56%: 83.33%: 47.22%: 54.17%: 8.33%: 75.00%: 83.33%: 79.17%: 98 ,61%. Scores were obtained due to various factors, including the learning process that was less meaningful, students' understanding and reasoning of the material was not in-depth, the generalization process of evidence or theory was not appropriate.
Kemampuan argumentasi siswa: Perbandingan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing dan inkuiri terbimbing dipadu dialog Socrates Dewi Ekaputri Pitorini; Suciati Suciati; Joko Ariyanto
Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA Vol 6, No 1: April 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/jipi.v6i1.27761

Abstract

Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui ada atau tidaknya perbedaan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah tertulis siswa melalui model pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dengan Inkuiri Terbimbing dipadu Dialog Socrates. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode quasi experimental research dengan desain penelitian posttest only with nonequivalent group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri A Karanganyar Tahun Pelajaran 2018/2019. Teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan adalah cluster random sampling. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah kelas XI IPA 1 sebagai kelas eksperimen 1 dengan model pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dan kelas XI IPA 2 sebagai kelas eksperimen 2 dengan model pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dipadu Dialog Socrates. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan teknik tes dan teknik non tes. Uji hipotesis yang digunakan adalah uji t. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa nilai rata-rata argumentasi ilmiah tertulis kelas eksperimen 2 lebih tinggi yaitu 74,44 dibandingkan dengan kelas eksperimen 1 yaitu 65,99. Hasil uji t menunjukkan bahwa thitungttabel (4,6751,99444), artinya terdapat perbedaan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah tertulis siswa yang signifikan antara kelas eksperimen 1 dan kelas eksperimen 2. Simpulan penelitian ini adalah bahwa ada perbedaan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah tertulis siswa melalui model pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dengan Inkuiri Terbimbing dipadu Dialog Socrates. Students' argumentation skills: A comparison between the guided-inquiry learning model and the Socrates dialogue-integrated guided-inquiry learning model AbstractThe research aimed to determine whether there was a difference in students’ written scientific argumentation skills through Guided Inquiry learning model and Guided Inquiry learning model integrated with Socratic Dialogue. The research was quasi-experimental research. The research design used was posttest only with nonequivalent group design. The population in this research were all students of class XI IPA of SMA Negeri A Karanganyar academic year 2018/2019. The sampling technique used in this research was cluster random sampling. The sample in this study was class XI IPA 1 as the experimental class 1 with the Guided Inquiry learning model and class XI IPA 2 as the experimental class 2 with the Guided Inquiry learning model combined with Socrates Dialogue.  The data collection technique used was test technique and non-test technique. The hypothesis test used was t-test. The results of the research showed that the average scientific written argument for the experimental class 2 was higher at 74.44 compared to the experimental class 1 at 65.99. The t-test results show that tcountttable (4,675 1,99444), meaning that there were significant differences in students' written scientific argumentation skills between the experimental class 1 and the experimental class 2. The conclusion of this study was that there was a difference in students' written scientific argumentation skills through the Guided Inquiry learning model with Guided Inquiry learning model integrated with Socrates Dialogue.
Co-Authors Assabai Nizar Urwani Bowo Sugiharto Candra Adi Prabowo Dewi Ekaputri Pitorini Murni Ramli Sri Dwiastuti Sri Widoretno Suciati Suciati Yeni Puspitasari