Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal UNEJ e-Proceeding Jurnal Ilmu Peternakan dan Veteriner Tropis (Journal of Tropical Animal and Veterinary Sciences)
Amam Amam
University of Jember
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Veterinary

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
COMPARISONS OF THE PROFITABILITY VALUE OF THE BROILER FARMING ON THREE MODELS OF PARTNERSHIP SYSTEM WITH CLOSE HOUSE SYSTEM IN MALANG REGENCY Julian Adam Rijal; Amam Amam
UNEJ e-Proceeding Proceeding of International Conference on Food Sovereignty and Sustainable Agriculture (FoSSA) 2017
Publisher : UPT Penerbitan Universitas Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Three models of partnership system with close house system was used in this researchconsists of : 1) profit sharing, 2) sub-contract, and 3) management fee. The aim of thisresearch was to (a) formulated production cost and cost structure was used for producingchicken meat, (b) analyzed profitability value based : GPM (Gross Profit Margin), NPM (NetProfit Margin), ROA (Return of Assets), and ROE (Return of Equity). The method of thisresearch that is case study. Sampling data was used consists of survey method, observation,and direct interview with farmers. The result showed that (a) production cost has spent byfarmers for producing one kilogram at partnership system with profit sharing system on Rp.21.006, sub-contract system on Rp. 21.132, and management fee system on Rp. 14.610; (b)GPM value at partnership system with profit sharing system on 7 %, sub-contract system on3% and management fee system on 11%; NPM value at partnership system with profitsharing system on 7,01 %, sub-contract system on 3,20 % and management fee system on10,74%; ROA value at partnership system with profit sharing system on 6,59 %, sub-contractsystem on 5,93% and management fee system on 19,42%; ROE value at partnership systemwith profit sharing system on 14,15 %, sub-contract system on -5,63% and management feesystem on 18,47%.
Usaha Ternak Sapi Perah di Kelompok Usaha Bersama (KUB) Tirtasari Kresna Gemilang: Identifikasi Sumber Daya dan Kajian Aspek Kerentanan: Dairy Cattle Farming Business at the Joint Business Group (KUB) Tirtasari Kresna Gemilang: Resources Identification and Vulnerability Aspect Study Amam Amam; Moh. Wildan Jadmiko; Pradiptya Ayu Harsita; Roni Yulianto; Nur Widodo; Soetriono Soetriono; Moh. Setyo Poerwoko
Jurnal Ilmu Peternakan dan Veteriner Tropis (Journal of Tropical Animal and Veterinary Science) Vol. 10 No. 1 (2020): Jurnal Ilmu Peternakan dan Veteriner Tropis (Journal of Tropical Animal and Ve
Publisher : Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46549/jipvet.v10i1.90

Abstract

Resources have an important role in livestock farming business, while the aspect of vulnerability can hamper the development of livestock farming business. The purpose of this study is to identify the resources of dairy cattle farming business and examine its effects on the aspects of vulnerability. The resources of this study consisted of economic resources, environmental resources, and social resources. The research was conducted in June-September 2019 at the Joint Business Group (KUB) of Tirtasari Kresna Gemilang which is located in Malang District, East Java Province. The 174 respondents are all dairy farmers who are the members of the group. The data collection methods used are Focus on Group Discussion (FGD), observation, and survey. The survey method was carried out through interviews and questionnaires. Data were analyzed using the Partial Least Square (PLS) method. The results showed that the vulnerability aspect of dairy cattle farming business was positively and significantly affected by economic and environmental resources (0,249 and 0,317, respectively). On the other hand, social resources had a negative influence, although it was not significant to the vulnerability aspect of dairy cattle farming business. The conclusion of the research shows that the aspect of the vulnerability of dairy cattle farming business is influenced by economic, environmental, and social resources by 29.5%.
Co-Authors Julian Adam Rijal Moh. Wildan Jadmiko Nur Widodo Poerwoko, Moh. Setyo Pradiptya Ayu Harsita Roni Yulianto Soetriono Soetriono