Amrul Bahar
Universitas Bengkulu

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN MENCARI PASANGAN DAN BERTUKAR PASANGAN DALAM KELOMPOK DISKUSI TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATERI SISTEM KOLOID KELAS XI IPA MAN 1 KOTA BENGKULU Sella Aprianika; Amrul Bahar; Salastri Rohiat
ALOTROP Vol 3, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : University of Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/atp.v3i1.9048

Abstract

This study aims to determine differences in student learning outcomes using a model of learning make a match with a model partner switch the subject matter colloidal system class XI IPA MAN 1 Bengkulu City in the academic year 2017/2018. The research population of all classes XI IPA amounted to 4 classes with a total population of 151 students. The sampling of the research was done by normality test and homogeneity test before the study population. Obtained a sample of research that consists of 2 classes of class XI IPA 1 as an experimental class I that apply the model make a match and class XI IPA 2 as an experimental class II using a model parten switch. Student learning outcomes are seen from the postest score. Students' learning outcomes in the make a match class had an average of 82.714 while in the partner switch the average pair was 77.5. This shows that the model of make a match is more effectively used in the process of learning in class than the model of partner switch. From the t test-t test on both experiment classes is obtained tcount and ttable = 1.707> 1.666 (? = 0,05). The results show that H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted which means that there is a significant difference between the learning result of the students using make a match model and the learning model partner switch on the material of the colloidal system.
PERBEDAAN HASIL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) MENGGUNAKAN MIND MAPPING DAN SUMMARIZES PADA KELAS XI IPA MAN 1 KOTA BENGKULU TAHUN AJARAN 2017/2018 Alfia Novera Indah Esa Kasih; Amrul Bahar; Salastri Rohiat
ALOTROP Vol 2, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : University of Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/atp.v2i2.7475

Abstract

This study aims to determine differences in ProblemBased learning (PBL) using mind mapping ( PBL-mind mapping) and summarizes (PBL –summarizes) on the subject of ionic equilibrium in saline solution. The type of research used is quasi experimental research with population class XI IPA in MAN 1 Kota Bengkulu 2017/2018 academic year which amounted to 152 people and samples taken from normal and homogenous population by random sampling technique so that got sample that is class XI IPA 1 (PBL -Mind Mapping) as an experiment 1 with 36 people and class XI IPA 2 (PBL-Summarizes) as an experiment 2 which is 38 people.Data obtained in the form of cognitive domain learning results obtained from test results in the form of pretest and post-test. Data analysis used were mean score, normality test, homogeneity test, and hypothesis / t test with significance value ? = 0.05 calculated with SPSS 16.0 for Windows. Student learning outcomes in this study seen from the value of difference between pretest and post-test values. The average of pretest and post-test difference of experimental class 1 and 2 students were 56.11 and 49.21 and t-test obtained t-count value is greater than t-table (2.088> 1.99).The results of the data show that there are significant differences between the experimental classes 1 and 2 and show that the result of learning PBL using mind mapping is better with KKM achievement of 83.4% than the result of learning PBL using summarizes with KKM exhaust amounted to 68.4%.
PERBANDINGAN HASIL BELAJAR KIMIA MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DAN THINK TALK WRITE Nadya Dirma Wahyuni; Amrul Bahar; Dewi Handayani
ALOTROP Vol 1, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : University of Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/atp.v1i2.3546

Abstract

[COMPARISON FROM LEARNING OUTCOMES OF PROBLEM BASED LEARNING MODELS AND THINK TALK WRITE  MODELS ]               Each learning model has advantages and disadvantages in every process.This research intent to know the difference student studying result on chemical learning among brazes that utilize learning model Problem Based Learning (PBL)  with class that utilize learning model Think is Write's Talc (TTW)  on jurisdictional material – chemical base law at class X SMA Negeri  10  Kota Bengkulu's . This research constitute quasi's experiment. Students learned result on observational it is seen from pretest's point and posttest difference. On class that utilize Problem Based Learning (PBL) model , increasing average value from student kognitiv as big as 49,23. Meanwhile class that utilize Think is Write's Talc (TTW) model ,  increasing average value learned student kognitiv as big as 56,33.   Hypothese  was tested by use of t test (? = 0,01) to result at t test  = 3,53 < t table  = 2,38. Research result to point out that are distinctive result  that significan among between class that utilize Problem Based Learning (PBL ) model and class that utilize Think is Write's Talk (TTW) model.
PERBANDINGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK TALK WRITE (TTW) DAN CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING (CPS) TERHADAP MINAT DAN HASIL BELAJAR KIMIA SISWA Ghea Sefriza Pratiwi; Amrul Bahar; Rina Elvia
ALOTROP Vol 3, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : University of Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/atp.v3i2.10497

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe the comparison of Think Talk Write learning models and Creative Problem Solving learning models to the interests and learning outcomes of chemistry in basic chemical law material. This research was conducted in January-May 2019. The research conducted was a kind of quasi-experimental research. The population of this study was class X MIA, totaling 136 students in SMAN 8 Kota Bengkulu in the academic year 2018/2019. Sampling was carried out after the normality and homogeneity test, so the X MIA 2 class was selected using Think Talk Write and X MIA 3 models that used the Creative Problem Solving model with a total of 68. Analysis of the data used was mean, normality test, test homogeneity, interest questionnaire analysis, N-Gain Score test and hypothesis test (t test). In general, both of these learning models are able to increase students 'interest and learning outcomes of chemistry, where the percentage of students' interest in learning chemistry in the Think Talk Write model is 80.5% and categorized as good, for the class of Creative Problem Solving model the percentage is 76.6% and also categorized as good. For the value of N-Gain score on Think Talk Write (TTW) class is and categorized as high while in the Creative Problem Solving class is 0.62 and is categorized as medium. The t-test results on the affective aspects are sig. (2-tailed) of 0.015 and on the cognitive aspect of 0.001. It states that there are significant differences in the interest and learning outcomes of chemistry that apply the Think Talk Write (TTW) learning model and Creative Problem Solving
PERBANDINGAN HASIL BELAJAR KIMIA SISWA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN WORD SQUARE DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN SCRAMBLE DI MAN 2 KOTA BENGKULU Weny Shintia; Amrul Bahar; Rina Elvia
ALOTROP Vol 3, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : University of Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/atp.v3i1.9034

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the chemistry learning outcomes of students with using word square model learning and scramble model learning in grade X MAN 2 Kota Bengkulu on the subject of chemistry compound nomenclature. This was quasy experimental research and held in March to May 2018. Population in this study is the entire class X MIA in MAN 2 Kota Bengkulu  2017/2018  academic   year,  amounting  to  149  students.  Sample  is  class  X  MIA  1  and  class  X  MIA  3.        The sample of the research is class X MIA 1 with 32 students and class X MIA 3 with 33 students. Data analysis used normality test, homogeneity test and hypothesis test (t test). Data analysis was performed using Statistical Package for The Social Science (SPSS) version 16.Improvement student’s learning outcomes in this research was taken from difference assess of pretest and posttest. At experiment class of I average value improvement  of student’s learning outcomes was 50.32. while at experiment  class of II, average value improvement of student’s learning outcomes was 44.4 . through some statistic test, there was t-test (? = 0.05) which done test the hypothesis to obtained the test result was t value = 2.174 and t tabel = 1.998. The result of data analysis showed that were significant differences in student learning outcomes between the class which implemented word square model learning and the class which implemented scramble model learning. Student learning outcomes that apply the word square model of learning better than student learning outcomes that apply the scramble model of learning.
PERBANDINGAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA DENGAN METODE INDEX CARD MATCH DAN BAMBOO DANCING Moli Novela; Amrul Bahar; Hermansyah Amir
ALOTROP Vol 1, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : University of Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/atp.v1i2.3530

Abstract

[COMPARISON OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES  BEETWEN  INDEX CARD MATCH  AND BAMBOO DANCING LEARNING METHOD]  In the learning process teachers often use lecture methods so that students tend to only accept what is given by teachers and many students who feel chemistry lessons are difficult and confusing lessons. This results in low student learning outcomes. One effort that can be done by using the teacher method is varied, one of which is the method of Index Card Match and Bamboo Dancing. This research type is experiment. The population is all students in class X MIPA SMA Negeri 2 Kota Bengkulu as many as 216 students. The sample selection was done by homogeneity test with the result obtained by class X MIPA C (experimental class I) which applied Index Card Match method and X MIPA D (experiment II class) applying Bamboo Dancing method. Data analysis used is normality test, homogeneity test and t test. In this study the results of learning are seen the value of the difference between the average pretest and posttest, where obtained for class X MIPA C is 53.75 and class X MIPA D is 45.55. Then t test is obtained where t test t > t table (3,76 > 2,38), so it can be concluded that there is a significant difference between student learning result using Index Card Match method with Bamboo Dancing on chemical compound nomenclature material.
PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN AUDITORY, INTELLECTUALY DAN REPETITION (AIR) DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MEDIA PEMBELAJARAN KARTU ARISAN UNTUK MENINGKATKAN AKTIVITAS DAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA KELAS X MIA 1 SMAN 8 KOTA BENGKULU Diana Sumiati; Amrul Bahar; Dewi Handayani
ALOTROP Vol 3, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : University of Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/atp.v3i2.9873

Abstract

This study aimed to improve learning activities and learning outcomes of students in class X MIA 1 of Senior High School (SMAN) 8 Bengkulu on the subject of chemical bonds through the application of Auditory, Intellectualy, and Repetition (AIR) learning models by using learning media with lottery card. This study is a classroom action research consisting of three cycles, each cycle consisting of four stages, planning, action, observation and reflection. In collection of data was done by non-test and test methods, teacher observation sheets, student observation sheets and post-test. The data was processed by using simple quantitative data analysis techniques, the total value of each student, the average value, the percentage of absorptive power, learning completeness and the average observation score.The results of the study in the 2018/2019 school year showed that the application of the Auditory Intellectualy Repitition learning model using learning media with lottery  cards in class X MIA 1 of SMA Negeri 8 Kota Bengkulu could improve teacher activities, student activities and student chemistry learning outcomes. This can be seen from the average score of teacher activities in the first cycle to the third cycle in a row : 23, 27.5 and 31.5. Student activity also showed improvement in each cycle. The average score of student activity in cycle I to cycle III was sequentially 20, 25 29.5. Learning outcomes also increase in each cycle. This can be seen from the average value of the test results in each cycle, in the first cycle of 61.82, in the second cycle of 67.88, in the third cycle of 79.09. Classical absorption in cycle I, cycle II, cycle III are 61.82%, 67.88%, 79.09%, with the percentage of completeness learning in each cycle of 42%, 73%, and 87.8 %.
STUDI PERBANDINGAN PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF MENGGUNAKAN MEDIA CHEMICAL DOMINO CARD DAN FLASH CARD Nina Gusti; Amrul Bahar; Dewi Handayani
ALOTROP Vol 1, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : University of Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/atp.v1i2.3507

Abstract

[COMPARISON STUDY OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING USING CHEMICAL DOMINO CARD AND FLASH CARD MEDIA] This study aims to measure differences in the results of chemistry learning between experimental class 1 classes that apply Chemical Domino Card learning media with experimental class 2 that apply Flash Card media at nomenclature of chemical compounds topics in class X IPA SMA Negeri 2 Kota Bengkulu at 2016 / 2017 academic year. Use of these two learning media is considered from the practicality, advantages, and effectivenes  The type of research is a quasi experimental research with the population of all students of class X MIPA in SMA Negeri 2 Kota Bengkulu at 2016/2017 academic year , which a sample class  is X MIPA E and X MIPA F. Implementation of research conducted by using two experimental class, X MIPA E which uses Chemical Domino Card media and class X MIPA F using Flash Card media. Data analysis used are  mean value, homogeneity test, normality test and t test. The average value of posttest experimental class I for first and second meeting is 77,5 and 79,72, while for experiment class II is 86,94 and 88,61. Then t test is done by using difference of pretest and posttest value of student, which is obtained that both at first meeting and second t count> t table that is 2,44> 2,38081 (first meeting) and 2,81> 2,38081 (second meeting ). The results of this study indicate that there is a significant difference of student learning outcomes using Chemical Domino Card and Flash Card media on the nomenclature of chemical compounds
PENERAPAN MODEL DISCOVERY LEARNING DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MEDIA VIDEO UNTUK MENINGKATKAN AKTIVITAS BELAJAR DAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA KELAS XI IPA 1 SMAN 1 KOTA BENGKULU Sitti Utami Medianty; Amrul Bahar; Elvinawati Elvinawati
ALOTROP Vol 2, No 1 (2018)
Publisher : University of Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/atp.v2i1.4689

Abstract

[APPLICATION OF DISCOVERY LEARNING MODEL BY USING VIDEO MEDIA TO INCREASE LEARNING ACTIVITIES AND STUDENT LEARNING RESULT CLASS XI IPA 1 SMAN 1 BENGKULU CITY]. The research has goals to improve the activity and learning outcomes chemistry at XI IPA 1 class in SMA Negeri 1 Bengkulu that consist of 30 students: 23 girls and 7 boys. This study is research of class action on thermochemistry subjects by discovery learning model. This research consist three cycle on four stage: planning, action, absorption, and reflection. The data collected using test and non test that consist of post test and observation sheet of activity teacher and student. The data processed using quantitative simple analysis techniques: average score of observation sheet of activity teacher and student, average score, absorption percentage clasical, andclasssical learning completness percentage. From the reseult, we can conculded that chemistry learning process applying discovery learning model using video can improve activity and outcomes learning chemistry student. It can be see from the average score of students. In the first cycle is 69.33 in which the percentage of classical absorption is 86.67 and classical learning completeness is 66.67. The average score of the second cycle is 71,33 in which the percentage of classical absorption is 89.17 and classical learning completeness is 73.33. The students’ average score of the third cycle is 81.33 in which the percentage of classical absorption is 90.37 and classical learning completeness is 86.67. The teacher’s activities of the learning process in the first cycle get average score 26.5 and it is good category, the second cycle is 27.5 and it is good category, the third cycle is 30 and it is good category too. Meanwhile, the student’s activities in the first cycle get average score 22.5 and it is good category, the second cycle is 25 and it is a good category, the third cycle is 27 and it is good category.
PERBANDINGAN PEMBELAJARAN SAINTIFIK MENGGUNAKAN MODEL KOOPERATIF TIPE STUDENT FASILITATOR AND EXPLAINING (SFE) DAN STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION (STAD) TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR KIMIA Florentina Astiani; Amrul Bahar; Hermansyah Amir
ALOTROP Vol 3, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : University of Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/atp.v3i1.9028

Abstract

This study aims to determine differences in student learning outcomes in chemistry learning using cooperative learning model of Student Facilitator and Explaining (SFE) type and Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) on the subject of compound nomenclature. This research type is quasi experiment research with population that is class X MIPA in SMAN 9 Kota Bengkulu even semester of academic year 2017/2018 while sample is class X MIPA 2 and class X MIPA 4 obtained from result of normality test and homogeneity test. Student learning outcomes in this study is seen from the difference between pretest and posttest values. Data analysis used were mean value, normality test, homogeneity test and hypothesis test (t test). The average of pretest and posttest difference of the students in the experimental class I (SFE) was obtained 58.70 while in the experimental class II (STAD) obtained the value 54.25. So it can be concluded that student learning outcomes that apply SFE type cooperative model is higher than student learning outcomes that apply STAD type. After testing hypothesis with significant level (? = 0,05), then obtained tcount value> ttable that is 1.782819 > 1.67469. The results showed that there was a significant difference between experimental class I using SFE type cooperative learning model and experiment II class using STAD type.