Sholihan Sholihan
Universitas Islam Darul 'Ulum

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

MAKNA PERSETUJUAN BERSAMA DPR DAN PRESIDEN DALAM PEMBENTUKAN UNDANG-UNDANG Aris Arianto; Afif Hasbullah; Sholihan Sholihan
MIMBAR YUSTITIA Vol 3 No 1 (2019): Juni 2019
Publisher : universitas islam darul ulum lamongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52166/mimbar.v3i1.1843

Abstract

The establishment of the Act must be approved by the President as stated in Article 20 of the 1945 Constitution paragraph (2). Interesting when Indonesia uses a presidential system with the separation of powers. However, in the formation of the Act involving the President. Article 20 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution confirms the necessity of mutual agreement in the discussion and ratification of the Law. However, there are other assertions, namely that in Article 20 paragraph (5) of the 1945 Constitution, even without the President's signature, the Act can still be promulgated within 30 days of the Draft Law being discussed. Things like that can't just happen without a reason. Therefore, the writing of this study will look for the meaning of the agreement between the DPR and the President in the formation of the Law and how the legal politics of Article 20 paragraph (5) of the 1945 Constitution. The writing of this study is focused on researching and searching for the meaning of mutual agreement and focusing on legal politics from Article 20 paragraph 5 of the 1945 Constitution. The research method in this writing is normative juridical. The results of the research can be concluded that the meaning of the joint agreement between the DPR and the President in the establishment of the Law is an agreement in determining the policy in the form of a Law which is a reflection of the principle of checks and balances. Legal politics Article 20 paragraph (5) of the 1945 Constitution is an affirmation of Article 20 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution or can be called an affirmation of collective agreement. The establishment of the Act must be approved by the President as stated in Article 20 of the 1945 Constitution paragraph (2). Interesting when Indonesia uses a presidential system with the separation of powers. However, in the formation of the Act involving the President. Article 20 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution confirms the necessity of mutual agreement in the discussion and ratification of the Law. However, there are other assertions, namely that in Article 20 paragraph (5) of the 1945 Constitution, even without the President's signature, the Act can still be promulgated within 30 days of the Draft Law being discussed. Things like that can't just happen without a reason. Therefore, the writing of this study will look for the meaning of the agreement between the DPR and the President in the formation of the Law and how the legal politics of Article 20 paragraph (5) of the 1945 Constitution. The writing of this study is focused on researching and searching for the meaning of mutual agreement and focusing on legal politics from Article 20 paragraph 5 of the 1945 Constitution. The research method in this writing is normative juridical. The results of the research can be concluded that the meaning of the joint agreement between the DPR and the President in the establishment of the Law is an agreement in determining the policy in the form of a Law which is a reflection of the principle of checks and balances. Legal politics Article 20 paragraph (5) of the 1945 Constitution is an affirmation of Article 20 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution or can be called an affirmation of collective agreement.
AKIBAT HUKUM ATAS PEMBATALAN SURAT KEPUTUSAN BUPATI TENTANG PEMBERHENTIAN KEPALA DESA SUMURBER KECAMATAN PANCENG KABUPATEN GRESIK Eksan Eksan; Ainul Masruroh; Sholihan Sholihan
MIMBAR YUSTITIA Vol 3 No 1 (2019): Juni 2019
Publisher : universitas islam darul ulum lamongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (366.956 KB) | DOI: 10.52166/mimbar.v3i1.1863

Abstract

The agency or the administrative office of the State does not necessarily succeed in carrying out its duties, sometimes the dispute arises due to a decision of the State administration that can cause dissatisfaction. The proposed termination of village chief conducted by the Village consultative Agency is not qualified as a reason to dismiss the head of Sumurber village, Panceng District, Gresik Regency. In addition to the State Administrative Decree/object dispute is contrary to government regulation about the village, also contrary to the regional regulation of Gresik Regency number 12 Year 2006 about the village government. On the other hand, the country's administrative decisions are contrary to good principles of government. Because the State Administrative Decree/object dispute is a state administrative decision contrary to good laws and principles of government. The author uses a method of scripting which provides the solution of legal case ATS that occur. This study analyzed the cancellation of decree of Regent of Gresik No. 141/678/HK/437.12/2013, dated 3 May 2013 concerning the dismissal of the village head of Sumurber, Panceng District, Gresik Regency. The decision of deliberation of the village consultative Agency related to the termination of the village head has been null and void, as a result of the Regent's decision on the termination of Sumurber village chief is irrevocable.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN AKIBAT PENGGUNAAN KOLAGEN INJEKSI DI INDONESIA Abdul Ghofur; Siti Afiyah; Sholihan Sholihan
MIMBAR YUSTITIA Vol 1 No 2 (2017): Desember 2017
Publisher : universitas islam darul ulum lamongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Consumer protection in Indonesia is considered to be of little concern, one example of the use of collagen injections which can be dangerous for patients who inject collagen not only makes the body fresh and healthy, but also makes the skin of the wearer smoother. More than that, this product is also claimed to make the wearer stay young. Excessive advertising, word of mouth, makes many women tempted to try. Moreover, in terms of relative prices, it is much cheaper than performing operations. The method used in this research is the normative juridical research type. Regulations related to the production and distribution of drugs and / or cosmetics in Indonesia, especially collagen injection, are contained in Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, Regulation of the Minister of Health Number 1010 / Menkes / Per / XI / 2008 concerning Drug Registration. Regulation of the Head of the Agency Number HK.04.1.33.12.11.09938 of 2011 concerning Criteria and Procedures for Withdrawal of Drugs Not Fulfilling Standards and / or Requirements and Law Number 36 Year 2009 concerning Health. In the Regulation of the Head of Drug and Food Control of the Republic of Indonesia Number 28 of 2013 concerning Supervision of the Importation of Medicinal Ingredients, Traditional Medicinal Materials, Health Supplement Ingredients and Food Ingredients into the Indonesian Territory the administrative responsibility The responsibility of business actors for the use of injectable collagen consists of criminal responsibility and civil liability.
DISPENSASI UMUR PERKAWINAN SETELAH BERLAKUNYA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 16 TAHUN 2019 TENTANG PERUBAHAN ATAS UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 01 TAHUN 1974 TENTANG PERKAWINAN M. Syaifur Rohman; Sholihan Sholihan; Muwahid Muwahid
MIMBAR YUSTITIA Vol 4 No 2 (2020): Desember 2020
Publisher : universitas islam darul ulum lamongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Marriage dispensation is regulated in Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning Amendments to Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. with considerations and reasons for not meeting the requirements for the age of marriage as determined by the applicable laws and regulations. This study aims to fulfill the general provisions regarding marriage according to Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning Marriage, and want to know how the implementation of the provision of marriage dispensation based on the provisions of Article 7 paragraph (2) of Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning Marriage. From the main results of the research, it can be concluded that Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning Marriage adheres to the principle that a prospective husband and wife must have enough body and soul so that there is a regulation on the marriage age limit for men or women who must be 19 years old. The granting of a marriage dispensation for a prospective husband or wife who has not reached the age limit for marriage can be submitted by the parents (guardians) of the prospective husband or wife to the Religious Court in the applicant's jurisdiction. The dispensation application can be granted by the judge if there is a reason that the relationship between the prospective husband and the prospective wife does not deviate from the religious norms they adhere to.
DISPENSASI UMUR PERKAWINAN SETELAH BERLAKUNYA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 16 TAHUN 2019 TENTANG PERUBAHAN ATAS UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 01 TAHUN 1974 TENTANG PERKAWINAN M. Syaifur Rohman; Sholihan Sholihan; Muwahid Muwahid
MIMBAR YUSTITIA Vol 4 No 2 (2020): Desember 2020
Publisher : universitas islam darul ulum lamongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52166/mimbar.v4i2.3250

Abstract

Marriage dispensation is regulated in Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning Amendments to Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. with considerations and reasons for not meeting the requirements for the age of marriage as determined by the applicable laws and regulations. This study aims to fulfill the general provisions regarding marriage according to Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning Marriage, and want to know how the implementation of the provision of marriage dispensation based on the provisions of Article 7 paragraph (2) of Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning Marriage. From the main results of the research, it can be concluded that Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning Marriage adheres to the principle that a prospective husband and wife must have enough body and soul so that there is a regulation on the marriage age limit for men or women who must be 19 years old. The granting of a marriage dispensation for a prospective husband or wife who has not reached the age limit for marriage can be submitted by the parents (guardians) of the prospective husband or wife to the Religious Court in the applicant's jurisdiction. The dispensation application can be granted by the judge if there is a reason that the relationship between the prospective husband and the prospective wife does not deviate from the religious norms they adhere to.